Dangerous wording on letter to congress re: salmonella and reptiles as pets - FaunaClassifieds
FaunaClassifieds  
 Sponsors »  Breeders | Dealers |  Importers/Exporters | Caging | Feed | Supplies | Services | Events 
  Inside FaunaClassifieds » Product Reviews |  Classifieds!   | Photo Gallery   | Banner Advertising 
 

Go Back   FaunaClassifieds > Reptile & Amphibian - Business Forums > General Business Discussions

Notices

General Business Discussions This is a general purpose forum open to business related topics concerning Reptiles and Amphibians that are neither appropriate for the Board of Inquiry, nor sales, purchase, or trade solicitations.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-26-2003, 01:03 PM   #1
Pennebaker
Dangerous wording on letter to congress re: salmonella and reptiles as pets

I dont know how many of you noticed the big red link on all pages of kingsnake that link to a proposition and letter to congress about salmonella and turtles, but...
http://personal.riverusers.com/~richardfife/page20.html

Anyhow, I find the letter that we are all supposed to send to our congressperson to be a little scary in its wording. Here is the quote that I find troublesome:

"The occurrence of Salmonella is frequent in all reptiles sold as pets, yet the FDA has banned only the sale of turtles under a certain size. "

Doesnt this look like a quote promoting banning all reptiles??? To me, this only seems to encourage congress--well if you are going to ban turtles, you better ban all reptiles... and how about some stats as to "frequent" and how "frequent" in reptiles vs other animals.
I wrote the guy who developed this letter (and kingsnake) about possibly changing the wording. If anyone else sees this as troubling as I do, please email the guy and ask him to change that wording.
The last thing I want to do as a reptile keeper is to encourage congress to look at banning all reptiles. And it being posted at the top of KS, I can see a lot of people just signing it without really seeing how it can be interpretted.

Thanks
Dana
 
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Smithsonian - Position on reptiles as pets SPJ Herps In The News 1 04-11-2007 09:20 AM
Product Wording INSANE CANES Just For Laughs 0 04-23-2006 08:16 AM
U.S. Congress Links Adamanteus General Legislative Discussions 2 09-24-2005 09:17 PM
MS: Bay St. Lousi to Outlaw "dangerous pets" Aprylla Herps In The News 1 01-20-2005 02:48 PM
Salmonella bacteria and reptiles.. Reptile educational handout cowboyway Cornsnakes & Ratsnakes Discussion Forum 3 05-09-2003 02:00 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.







Fauna Top Sites


Powered by vBulletin® Version
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Page generated in 0.09912610 seconds with 11 queries
Content copyrighted ©2002-2022, FaunaClassifieds, LLC