Mustangrde1
Sistrurus Motel "Welcome"
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2003
- Messages
- 364
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Location
- That information is no ones business
This is my opinion
When a site starts out free as a public service it should remain free at all times. If the intent is to have a “for profit” service it should have been created as such from the beginning! The members helped to build the site and by now contemplating charging them a service fee for such a service is slap in the face of the people who helped build such a site.
Where as I believe charging for the right to post classifieds, banners or advertisements is a legitimate action for negating some of the cost of running such an operation. Charging the general membership base to offset the cost is not.
The members of this site are the ones who make it what it is. Without these people and the ones to come this site will certainly loose many good people that are willing to contribute their time and resources to help others.
A person can not factor in time spent on a site based on an hourly wage if they created it to be nonprofit to begin with. There are many good people who own and run or are staff on numerous websites that are not paid for the time they devote to helping run a site. It is common knowledge that it is a volunteer action you take on to aid a friend or a cause you believe in. Thus you are not paid for your efforts and in many cases not even thanked for them.
This would be a smart choice to gain revenue for the site. However with Kingsnakes marketing power and “known” status I firmly believe that the vendors would just use it and not fauna’s as Kingsnake does generate them more business from the vendors I have spoken to about where they generate the most internet sales from.
Guest this wont effect in any way as they currently can not view the BOI without registering.
Members built the BOI without them there would be no BOI look at all the other sites who have one and how very little they are used. Fauna is known for the BOI and thus it gets used. By having members only be able to read it and not reply or make new threads it will quickly become of no use to anyone as many will not pay for the right to post when they can find a site that is free. That site will then become the home of the new BOI.
Every person be they a single poster or a person with 1000+ post is and should be a valuable member to any site. Putting any one or group of persons down for not having a large volume of post should be a slap in the face to all members especially when coming from the sites owner.
Why am I so against cost for viewing or replying? Simple I was on a board at one time that had a very large member base. The owner decided he wished to charge people for the right to view and post. The day he started the posting dropped off by 90% then after I believe it was 2 months opened it back up to free. The thing is the members remember that stunt and did not come back this was 7 or 8 years back the site was gone within 6 months. I would be willing to bet people haven’t changed that much and do not forget. Membership builds sites and groups without them there is not one!
You want to keep your members but force them to pay for what is free now and will definitely be free on other boards they will leave.
When I sign on to something that is free and then find out several years later that the person wants to now charge I will just find another site that’s free. If I was told up front it would cost me then I would have either signed up or not. But the choice was mine at that time to make. Now it is as if you either pay me or you don’t get the freedoms and rights you currently have. Sorry I didn’t sign on to fauna to pay and had I know from the start I would be forced to pay down the road I would not have signed on. Again I can see advertising rates but not charges for the right to post on forums of any kind.
No offence intended but you ask for input that’s how I see it from personal views on a site charging after it has a large member base, to what happened with one site that tried it. I hope that it helps in some way.
<Taken from the first line of the BOI in his own words.>WEBSLAVE
This forum is designed to serve the purpose of giving anyone interested in the buying and selling of herptile related merchandise the opportunity to inquire about, or find already existing information concerning a person or business with whom they are considering doing business with.
<Taken from the first sentence of the disclaimer of the BOI.>WEBSLAVE
I am providing this forum as a public service.
When a site starts out free as a public service it should remain free at all times. If the intent is to have a “for profit” service it should have been created as such from the beginning! The members helped to build the site and by now contemplating charging them a service fee for such a service is slap in the face of the people who helped build such a site.
Where as I believe charging for the right to post classifieds, banners or advertisements is a legitimate action for negating some of the cost of running such an operation. Charging the general membership base to offset the cost is not.
The members of this site are the ones who make it what it is. Without these people and the ones to come this site will certainly loose many good people that are willing to contribute their time and resources to help others.
A person can not factor in time spent on a site based on an hourly wage if they created it to be nonprofit to begin with. There are many good people who own and run or are staff on numerous websites that are not paid for the time they devote to helping run a site. It is common knowledge that it is a volunteer action you take on to aid a friend or a cause you believe in. Thus you are not paid for your efforts and in many cases not even thanked for them.
WEBSLAVE off the BOI from the thread financing the boi
So in this case for the classified sections,
• a guest (or unregistered) could read the ads but not reply to them nor create a thread (ad) themselves.
• A non-paying member could read the thread (ads) and reply to them, but could not post a thread (ad).
• A paying member could post a thread, reply to their own thread, and reply to other's threads.
This would be a smart choice to gain revenue for the site. However with Kingsnakes marketing power and “known” status I firmly believe that the vendors would just use it and not fauna’s as Kingsnake does generate them more business from the vendors I have spoken to about where they generate the most internet sales from.
In the case of the BOI it would be:
• guests and unregistered viewers would not be able to view the BOI, nor post anything in it.
• non-paying members would be able to view the BOI, but not able to post new threads nor replies to any of them.
• paying members would be able to read the BOI and post both new threads and replies.
Guest this wont effect in any way as they currently can not view the BOI without registering.
Members built the BOI without them there would be no BOI look at all the other sites who have one and how very little they are used. Fauna is known for the BOI and thus it gets used. By having members only be able to read it and not reply or make new threads it will quickly become of no use to anyone as many will not pay for the right to post when they can find a site that is free. That site will then become the home of the new BOI.
Every person be they a single poster or a person with 1000+ post is and should be a valuable member to any site. Putting any one or group of persons down for not having a large volume of post should be a slap in the face to all members especially when coming from the sites owner.
Why am I so against cost for viewing or replying? Simple I was on a board at one time that had a very large member base. The owner decided he wished to charge people for the right to view and post. The day he started the posting dropped off by 90% then after I believe it was 2 months opened it back up to free. The thing is the members remember that stunt and did not come back this was 7 or 8 years back the site was gone within 6 months. I would be willing to bet people haven’t changed that much and do not forget. Membership builds sites and groups without them there is not one!
• non-paying members would be able to view the BOI, but not able to post new threads nor replies to any of them.
You want to keep your members but force them to pay for what is free now and will definitely be free on other boards they will leave.
When I sign on to something that is free and then find out several years later that the person wants to now charge I will just find another site that’s free. If I was told up front it would cost me then I would have either signed up or not. But the choice was mine at that time to make. Now it is as if you either pay me or you don’t get the freedoms and rights you currently have. Sorry I didn’t sign on to fauna to pay and had I know from the start I would be forced to pay down the road I would not have signed on. Again I can see advertising rates but not charges for the right to post on forums of any kind.
No offence intended but you ask for input that’s how I see it from personal views on a site charging after it has a large member base, to what happened with one site that tried it. I hope that it helps in some way.
or get off the pot. 
