Just recently got to the point where I can breed my gecko's. Some had to grow up a bit.
My biology classes are coming back to me (never thought I would use the genetics stuff).
From what I can gather there is;
Albino
Patternless
Blizzard
which are recessive genes. Giant as well but I am skeptical about that, seems like a line bred trait to me, but what do I know.
Co-Dominant Snow gene - too expenisive for me.....unless someone would like to donate one to me :scatter:
Then there are the line bred traits, SH, SHTCT, Snow and so on.
1. Albino X Patternless = Patternless Albino, Patternless, no black with Albino eyes. (I have been led to believe this is not an easy combination with trempers)
2. Albino X Blizzard = Blazing Blizzard , Blizzard with albino eyes.
3. Blizzard X Patternless = Banana Blizzard.
I realize you need to make hets and breed them back to accomplish recessive gene combinations and use punnet squares or straight probability will accomplish the same thing to figure out the odds of achieving what you set out to do.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of genetics tells me line bred traits are not guaranteed, especially if one of the breeders does not carry the trait then you will end up with varying degrees of the trait. Even if both parents carry the trait it is not guaranteed but the odds of it coming out are much greater.
This leads me to what I am having the most trouble with, HYBINOS, SUNGLOWS or whatever ya want to call em. To me they are nothing more than orange albinos (expensive ones at that). From what I can gather you breed a SH or SHTCT or TT or whatever to an Albino. Breed the offsping back to each other or the Albino and there you have it, HYBINOS SUNGLOWS? Correct? Orange Albinos. So if this is correct, what makes them so expensive, you have combined a line bred trait and a recessive gene. This would seem to me to be easier than 2 or 3 recessive genes.
Just my thoughts.
My biology classes are coming back to me (never thought I would use the genetics stuff).
From what I can gather there is;
Albino
Patternless
Blizzard
which are recessive genes. Giant as well but I am skeptical about that, seems like a line bred trait to me, but what do I know.
Co-Dominant Snow gene - too expenisive for me.....unless someone would like to donate one to me :scatter:
Then there are the line bred traits, SH, SHTCT, Snow and so on.
1. Albino X Patternless = Patternless Albino, Patternless, no black with Albino eyes. (I have been led to believe this is not an easy combination with trempers)
2. Albino X Blizzard = Blazing Blizzard , Blizzard with albino eyes.
3. Blizzard X Patternless = Banana Blizzard.
I realize you need to make hets and breed them back to accomplish recessive gene combinations and use punnet squares or straight probability will accomplish the same thing to figure out the odds of achieving what you set out to do.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of genetics tells me line bred traits are not guaranteed, especially if one of the breeders does not carry the trait then you will end up with varying degrees of the trait. Even if both parents carry the trait it is not guaranteed but the odds of it coming out are much greater.
This leads me to what I am having the most trouble with, HYBINOS, SUNGLOWS or whatever ya want to call em. To me they are nothing more than orange albinos (expensive ones at that). From what I can gather you breed a SH or SHTCT or TT or whatever to an Albino. Breed the offsping back to each other or the Albino and there you have it, HYBINOS SUNGLOWS? Correct? Orange Albinos. So if this is correct, what makes them so expensive, you have combined a line bred trait and a recessive gene. This would seem to me to be easier than 2 or 3 recessive genes.
Just my thoughts.