aleria
New member
Ok, I was just going to make this a response to a post on the boi, but considering the fact that I've seen basically this same post in one form or another in every single boi thread I figured I'd just make it a thread all it's own.
I see so many people state, in regards to someone else being scammed, that they "won't do business with someone unless they can talk to them on the phone so they can see if they sound like a scammer". I see absolutely zero logic in this train of thought. Sure, maybe that might help you weed out the scammers from other countries that obviously wouldn't even be able to give you a phone number. But can anyone truly say that it's any harder for someone to lie while speaking than while typing?
And of course unless you feel like going back and rehashing absolutely every single point made during that phone conversation later on in an email, then you really are screwing yourself when it comes to both buyer and seller protection. Anything said during that phone conversation that isn't later re-discussed in an email is just plain hearsay, there is no record of it, so there is no way for you to go back and claim that the seller ever even stated anything you are claiming they did and have any real proof of it.
Sure a phone conversation with the person with some general chit chat about their husbandry, experience, knowledge, etc. might be nice to get a feel for the person as I know some people really do prefer a phone conversation to email. But when it comes to anything really important with the transaction I just don't see how a phone conversation can prevent any scamming.
I personally hate talking on the phone and avoid it at all costs. Hell, I spent hours teaching my parents how to use email and IM just so I wouldn't have to talk to them on the phone any more.
But when it comes time for me to start selling, does that mean I'm going to have people decide not to do business with me just because I would prefer to keep everything in a secure, fully archived and monitored environment such as email rather than a phone conversation? I mean I would feel like I was being annoying going back and typing up an email after every phone conversation going over each and every point of any importance and have them agree with it just to cover my ass with every transaction. But it seems like that would be the only way to do it and not leave myself open to people coming back later on trying to claim that I said one thing on the phone and another in email.
I'm sure at this point most people can't even count the number of threads we've come across where that exact argument has come up, claiming something majorly important to the transaction was discussed over the phone, and now everyone is left with no proof of that fact and someone is getting screwed because of it.
Sorry, it all just seems a little ridiculous to me that so many people over the years have stated that they will actually refuse to do business with someone that would prefer not to discuss transactions over the phone, when in all actuality it really is protecting both the buyer and the seller NOT to do so.
<end rant>
I see so many people state, in regards to someone else being scammed, that they "won't do business with someone unless they can talk to them on the phone so they can see if they sound like a scammer". I see absolutely zero logic in this train of thought. Sure, maybe that might help you weed out the scammers from other countries that obviously wouldn't even be able to give you a phone number. But can anyone truly say that it's any harder for someone to lie while speaking than while typing?
And of course unless you feel like going back and rehashing absolutely every single point made during that phone conversation later on in an email, then you really are screwing yourself when it comes to both buyer and seller protection. Anything said during that phone conversation that isn't later re-discussed in an email is just plain hearsay, there is no record of it, so there is no way for you to go back and claim that the seller ever even stated anything you are claiming they did and have any real proof of it.
Sure a phone conversation with the person with some general chit chat about their husbandry, experience, knowledge, etc. might be nice to get a feel for the person as I know some people really do prefer a phone conversation to email. But when it comes to anything really important with the transaction I just don't see how a phone conversation can prevent any scamming.
I personally hate talking on the phone and avoid it at all costs. Hell, I spent hours teaching my parents how to use email and IM just so I wouldn't have to talk to them on the phone any more.
But when it comes time for me to start selling, does that mean I'm going to have people decide not to do business with me just because I would prefer to keep everything in a secure, fully archived and monitored environment such as email rather than a phone conversation? I mean I would feel like I was being annoying going back and typing up an email after every phone conversation going over each and every point of any importance and have them agree with it just to cover my ass with every transaction. But it seems like that would be the only way to do it and not leave myself open to people coming back later on trying to claim that I said one thing on the phone and another in email.
I'm sure at this point most people can't even count the number of threads we've come across where that exact argument has come up, claiming something majorly important to the transaction was discussed over the phone, and now everyone is left with no proof of that fact and someone is getting screwed because of it.
Sorry, it all just seems a little ridiculous to me that so many people over the years have stated that they will actually refuse to do business with someone that would prefer not to discuss transactions over the phone, when in all actuality it really is protecting both the buyer and the seller NOT to do so.
<end rant>
100%