old guy
New member
you cannot breed unpredictability out
it is just that ! You are not the brain of the breed. While there are breeds that doesn't tolerate kids or the pulling of tails,ears, looking into the direct eyes, upside down in the submissive stance, most of these breeds are of smaller size like poodles, schnauzers, rat terriers, etc, they can do damage but hardly ever fatality damage of death like the rots and pits do. Did i say that rots and pits bite more than these other breeds ? No ! But damage and destruction is far more serious to life and limb. I didn't relate the well trained dog as another poster did . But it didn't matter in my case of my " best trained " rottie. It was conceived a voice of the person that set my female off on his receiving bite and he wasn't even looking, talking to the dog. Now if that isn't unpredictable behavior, I don't know what would be. I have kept up with many bite scenarios of these 2 main breeds and if it is not PACK syndrome, then it is bred unpredictability. That is my absolute opinion and knowledge. Now I'm not saying they shouldn't be bred or kept. but then we have the irresponsible or un-responsible person keeping. I would have to agree that many attacks and bites from any animal happens on the owners side of not being responsible. I don't think a breed of the 2 dogs that I have been discussing here should be kept around children as we have seen to be the biggest bite and attack scenario. I DID have all my rotties around my young daughters when they were growing up but I wouldn't even consider the breed now with me raising my grandsons. As in a venomous snake bite as i keep ( hot snakes ), it only takes one accident to be serious enough and there are just to many bites and attacks by these breeds to call it isolated anymore.
My bad on the aggresive part and protective part, TRUE that agressive doesn't mean protective or vice versa ?
it is just that ! You are not the brain of the breed. While there are breeds that doesn't tolerate kids or the pulling of tails,ears, looking into the direct eyes, upside down in the submissive stance, most of these breeds are of smaller size like poodles, schnauzers, rat terriers, etc, they can do damage but hardly ever fatality damage of death like the rots and pits do. Did i say that rots and pits bite more than these other breeds ? No ! But damage and destruction is far more serious to life and limb. I didn't relate the well trained dog as another poster did . But it didn't matter in my case of my " best trained " rottie. It was conceived a voice of the person that set my female off on his receiving bite and he wasn't even looking, talking to the dog. Now if that isn't unpredictable behavior, I don't know what would be. I have kept up with many bite scenarios of these 2 main breeds and if it is not PACK syndrome, then it is bred unpredictability. That is my absolute opinion and knowledge. Now I'm not saying they shouldn't be bred or kept. but then we have the irresponsible or un-responsible person keeping. I would have to agree that many attacks and bites from any animal happens on the owners side of not being responsible. I don't think a breed of the 2 dogs that I have been discussing here should be kept around children as we have seen to be the biggest bite and attack scenario. I DID have all my rotties around my young daughters when they were growing up but I wouldn't even consider the breed now with me raising my grandsons. As in a venomous snake bite as i keep ( hot snakes ), it only takes one accident to be serious enough and there are just to many bites and attacks by these breeds to call it isolated anymore.
My bad on the aggresive part and protective part, TRUE that agressive doesn't mean protective or vice versa ?
post.
Cat! I thought I was one of the only ones who uses "him's"