We will sure take a look at this.
A bit of info about the "snow" tegu morph. Bobby keeps insisting that a snow tegu is (or should be) a combination of the albino morph and a melanistic blue tegu.
If it is a Snow morph, than in my opinion it is fine to call them just that, however, they are albinos and not snow morphs at all.
I just wanted to clear up the fact that Ron NEVER made the claim that this was how the snow tegu was created.
I think matters little how they were “claimed” to be created, the fact is they are being called a snow morph, and are being sold as such. Albinos are bringing much less then the so called snow morphs, even though the snow morphs are nothing more than a lighter colored albino from the same exact clutch.
It is true that a snow corn snake, or a snow boa are created by combining the albino and melanistic morphs. However, the snow leopard geckos have no albino in them whatsoever. Yet, they're still called "snows". A blizzard corn snake and a blizzard leopard gecko are not created the same way either. Yet they're both still called "blizzards". The reason? Because terms like "snow", "sunglow", "blizzard", etc are not scientific descriptions of morphs.
Looks like a bunch of rock jumping there, as for the geckos, and I am no expert on them, there were line bred Snows and Mac snows, and are morphs or selectively bred for color, as far as I know, as I said I am no expert on them. Then he speaks of the blizzards, they are not snows, nor are they called such.
Both sound cold though.
They are simply marketing created terms and can be applied in different ways. The truth about snow tegus is that they are albinos that are different from the original albino tegus. And that's all that Ron ever claimed they were.
Yea, I think that speaks real loud there, "marketing terms", is that what it is? So what is the "marketing terms" for? Is it a way to collect extra cash on animals that are not any more special then the siblings?
These animals are out of the same clutch, but if you get lucky one will be lighter in color.
So, how are they a different albino? Take albino boas as an example, some are lighter than others in the same clutch, are they the same albinos? They would not be called Snow morphs, but rather albinos.
Here is another comment from there I wanted to address:
Their description is exactly how I feel about that subject. Even though blue tegus came from a small original group of possibly related tegus, risking the inbreeding was the only way for these animals to be produced so that we can have them in our collections. It is now a matter of trying to collect future breeders from over a long period of time and from different sources to ensure that they are as distantly related as possible to keep as diverse as we can.
So, these tegus came from a small original group, but if you collect future breeders from over a long period of time and from different sources it will ensure that they are as distantly related as possible to keep them as diverse as you can?
So how exactly would that make them diverse? They are all still related, and it would/will not change anything.
How many people have relatives all over the country, or world for that matter? They are all different ages, but still related, correct? Are they in anyway diverse, based on this? That is a false statement, in the end they all are out of the original very few siblings regardless how you slice it up. If you have a brother in Texas, and you live in Florida, are you not still brothers? You would not be any more diverse in any way, regardless how old you are, or where you are from.
I hope this answers the questions you had, if not, let me know and I will try harded.
