Chances are it's not a morph. "Normals" have a wide variety of color and patterns, and as Greg stated, even an abberant looking snake isn't considered a morph until it can be proven to be genetic. Definition of a morph, as per SnakeKeeper's website (
www.ballpython.com) is A) its appearrance different from the norm in an easily observable way, and B) it can pass this aberrant color/pattern genetically. To my understanding, there have been several snakes who definitely fit A) but fail in B). Good luck with him though!