chris allen
Well-known member
So does anyone refer to their dragons that are possible hets (66% 50% etc) as hets, instead of POSSIBLE hets? Couple of us had commented on an ad where the dragons were listed as double hets, but yet having two parents that were hets, the babies would only be 66% possible hets. The ad was deleted. Does anyone agree or disagree?
Would you be under the assumption if you bought a double het or a het, that it would be 100% het?
Or would you expect it to be labeled as 100% if it was actually in fact 100%, and if not labeled as such, assume it was a possible het when referred to as a het?
I, myself have always thought when someone referred to something as a het, it was in fact 100% Het. Anything less would be labeled as possible or probable.
What do you think?
Would you be under the assumption if you bought a double het or a het, that it would be 100% het?
Or would you expect it to be labeled as 100% if it was actually in fact 100%, and if not labeled as such, assume it was a possible het when referred to as a het?
I, myself have always thought when someone referred to something as a het, it was in fact 100% Het. Anything less would be labeled as possible or probable.
What do you think?

