• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Adam Wysocki - No response

Clay Davenport said:
Both of you knock it off. If you want to continue your bickering do so via PM.

For the record Deborah, your original post on the subject, #390, was anonymous heresay and has no place on the BOI. However, since you named him before you got an infraction for it, you dodged it this time. In the future, name your source, or preferably let them post it themselves, or else don't mention it at all.
As far as I'm concerned, it still shouldn't have been brought up by anyone but Chad, but he is free to either support or refute the statement as he sees fit.

Now back to the actual topic of the thread.
Click to expand...

Vindication is mine! :ack2:
 
Jamie... Sweetheart... You talk like that round me or some of my boys; you would be hospitalized with the quickness!! Watch your mouth smart_____!!! So you know; K!! Continue the support for a thief; super honorable... Racist trashtalker who need's an ___ kickin'!!
 
Tom Pecanic said:
Jamie... Sweetheart... You talk like that round me or some of my boys; you would be hospitalized with the quickness!! Watch your mouth smart_____!!! So you know; K!! Continue the support for a thief; super honorable... Racist trashtalker who need's an ___ kickin'!!
Click to expand...

Tom,

I love the tough talk there, Keyboard Commando. Keep the threats coming tough guy. By the way, how exactly am I racist?

Love always,

Jamie
 
i think ive only read through a (small) handful of threads that have actually stayed on topic throughout the whole thread here in the boi.

is it not possible anymore ??!!
 
I want than everyone who posted this morning for keeping Adam Wysocki and his scammy thievery on Page 1.

As far as I'm concerned, until he pays David and Andrew, his name should stay on the front page.
 
jglass38 said:
Tom,

I love the tough talk there, Keyboard Commando. Keep the threats coming tough guy. By the way, how exactly am I racist?

Love always,

Jamie
Click to expand...

your really not smart enough to see your racism? or do you just play dumb that good? proud parents either way im sure :thumbsup:
 
ed hummel said:
your really not smart enough to see your racism? or do you just play dumb that good? proud parents either way im sure :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

It would be "YOU'RE not smart enough to see your racism?" and "Or do you just play dumb that WELL?" Just sayin'
 
And since that last comment will probably get me banned for a year, you guys keep on with your ridiculous thread that is going nowhere. Beat the dead horse until it is unrecognizable and I'll see you in a year still doing the same thing.
 
ed hummel said:
just sayin but not answering... go figure. very proud parents indeed ;)
Click to expand...

I think you should go and do a little research and learn what racism is and stop throwing the term around where it doesn't fit. :rolleyes:
 
jglass38 said:
Aight, yo ;). Let's get back on subject. Wait, what was the topic again?
Click to expand...

wow for someone so articulate with the english language what made you start your response to deb aight yo?

for some reason throwing the word racist at you seems a good fit.

could you check my english and spelling for any mistakes please :)
 
ed hummel said:
wow for someone so articulate with the english language what made you start your response to deb aight yo?

for some reason throwing the word racist at you seems a good fit.

could you check my english and spelling for any mistakes please :)
Click to expand...

Sometimes I like to speak in a more loose and street fashion, especially when I am speaking to friends. Ya heard me? <-- See? :shrug01: So once again I ask, where is the racism in that?
 
jglass38 said:
Sometimes I like to speak in a more loose and street fashion, especially when I am speaking to friends. Ya heard me? <-- See? :shrug01: So once again I ask, where is the racism in that?
Click to expand...

Alright, guys be careful, I do not want to see anyone get into trouble playing around in the mud.

Jamie, no friend of Jas's could possibly be a friend of mine. So therefore, I take it that you meant the complete opposite with your saluation to me, and calling me names isn't something my FRIENDS do.

Also, I have received a few of your friend's the Joker's emails/posts on another forum..I kept one..and I have another from another of your friends JoePythons...nah, y'all not no friends of mine and y'all not hanging with me, YO!?:rolleyes:

Now, back on topic..when is Adam going to pay his debts? I am pretty sure that NetPet has been collecting enough donations to make this possible since those involved can legally pay their debts, rent, etc with the funds.:dgrin:
 
deborahbroadus said:
Alright, guys be careful, I do not want to see anyone get into trouble playing around in the mud.

Jamie, no friend of Jas's could possibly be a friend of mine. So therefore, I take it that you meant the complete opposite with your saluation to me, and calling me names isn't something my FRIENDS do.

Also, I have received a few of your friend's the Joker's emails/posts on another forum..I kept one..and I have another from another of your friends JoePythons...nah, y'all not no friends of mine and y'all not hanging with me, YO!?:rolleyes:

Now, back on topic..when is Adam going to pay his debts? I am pretty sure that NetPet has been collecting enough donations to make this possible since those involved can legally pay their debts, rent, etc with the funds.:dgrin:
Click to expand...

That hurts...I thought we were tight.

Anyway...Adam isn't involved in NatPet and hasn't been for quite a while. Even if he was, I highly doubt he would use that money to pay anyone back. That would be a misappropriation of funds. Those guys will just have to wait until Adam has the money to pay them. Most of the uninformed here don't know Adam personally and therefore should stop speculating on what money he has or doesn't have. This is a simple case as it has been since day one. One or two people are supposedly owed money. This forum isn't going to help in any way. Adam isn't involved in this hobby and won't be ever again. The only value the BOI has is to put pressure on people still involved in the hobby. So...As I suggested many pages back, these people should contact an attorney and attempt to settle things like adults do. You know, in person, not on the Internet. :iagree:
 
jglass38 said:
That hurts...I thought we were tight.

Anyway...Adam isn't involved in NatPet and hasn't been for quite a while. Even if he was, I highly doubt he would use that money to pay anyone back. That would be a misappropriation of funds. Those guys will just have to wait until Adam has the money to pay them. Most of the uninformed here don't know Adam personally and therefore should stop speculating on what money he has or doesn't have. This is a simple case as it has been since day one. One or two people are supposedly owed money. This forum isn't going to help in any way. Adam isn't involved in this hobby and won't be ever again. The only value the BOI has is to put pressure on people still involved in the hobby. So...As I suggested many pages back, these people should contact an attorney and attempt to settle things like adults do. You know, in person, not on the Internet. :iagree:
Click to expand...

I agree, David and Andrew should hire a very expensive lawyer, sue Wysocki's left nut off and then make Adam pay their legal fees, plus any interest owed on the debt. Hopefully that lawyer will get his wages garnered and hire a forensic accountant to pick apart NatPet - how much they took in and where the money went.

...and they aren't "supposedly" owed any money. On at least three forums, Wysocki has acknowledged owing the debt.

As far as settling things like adults do - honest adults pay their debts. Honest adults don't screw people out of thousands of dollars and then stick their heads up their asses, and lastly, honest adults don't have other people pop up on forums defending their indefensible actions.

I also agree that this is a simple case: a case in which someone royally screwed two people out of something they were owed. Yep, a simple case of some jack-ass scamming people half a world away out of thousands of dollars.
 
DGreen said:
...or he could pay his debts and this thread will go away. I know it's a crazy thought.
Click to expand...

What you all fail to realize is that this isn't about stolen snakes, or sick snakes or anything else. It is about a business debt. That is it. Obviously he doesn't have the money to pay it or he would. So let the wronged parties try to settle this legally. Is this really that hard to comprehend for some of you?
 
Back
Top