Bad Guy Emiley Jones (Emileypaige776)

[Dennis Hultman]

Miss Emiley, I do hope that you gave everyone that mentioned an opinon not in your favor "Bad Karma" as you did me, I would think that should be the fare thing to do.

No, that would be me Sister Katheryn. Why are you even addressing karma when you owe her an apology for making a wrongful assumption and for basically calling Emiley a thief when you had no clue what you are really looking at in the screen shots.

I expected Bridgette not to apologize for it by her conduct here but not Sister Katheryn.

I have read this thread from beginning to end a few times, I felt something was missing and I just felt something was fishy about the way Emiley went about this transaction. And yes Bridgette, it is shameful how ppl jumped on you, called you very hurtful names and threw you under the bus......I do believe you are owed an apology....period.
I have purchased many many geckos from you in the past, (and will in the future) and you were very professonal, quick to reply and very helpful. It really hurt me to see how people conducted themselves here, and knowing you, I am sure the sting from it all must have penetrated very deep.
Sister Kathy

There was nothing Fishy and nobody owes Bridgette that apology. But you sure do for making assumptions, SISTER. Why can't you just apologize for being wrong ?

Now, Karma is not a legitimate topic of this thread. If you would like to take issue with it take it to the appropriate forum.

 

[houseape57]

Mr Hultman, I was going to apologize. And if you want to go ahead and give me all the bad karma there is you may, all I ask of you is please do not mock my Siste Hood again with the bold font and sarcasim, it is very hurtful and uncalled for. I did try to put this in Karma topic section but I am very sorry that I find computers difficult at times.
Blessings to you Mr. Hultman
No since remarking, I will not be back.

 

[Emileypaige776]

I'm not actually sure what Karma does on this website? But I can assure you I didn't give you negative Karma. Even if it is deserved. How does anyone know your a sister? This may be a blond moment on my part I'm really confused how that came about? But since you won't be back maybe someone else can help me out on this one...

-Emiley

 

[Dennis Hultman]

Miss Emiley, I do hope that you gave everyone that mentioned an opinon not in your favor "Bad Karma" as you did me, I would think that should be the fare thing to do.

I should leave it alone because it's not appropriate here but I will go one step further and answer your question. No, I didn't give "Bad Karma" to the others. I chose to hold you to a higher standard and I will tell you why.

None of your other posts on this forum did you decide to use that title. Only this one post when you chose to make a assumption about another, YOU DID. That assumption was false.

You decided to use that title for the weight it carried with your remarks. As a member here I have a right to give karma to and take from other members. I found your post to be particularly bad in the context it was made.

I am not making fun of anything. I'm pointing out what you have done here. If you will go back and reread your post you made a large assumption with no evidence. Who is doing disservice to that title?

 

[Dennis Hultman]

I should leave it alone because it's not appropriate here but I will go one step further and answer your question. No, I didn't give "Bad Karma" to the others. I chose to hold you to a higher standard and I will tell you why.

None of your other posts on this forum did you decide to use that title. Only this one post when you chose to make a assumption about another, YOU DID. That assumption was false.

You decided to use that title for the weight it carried with your remarks. As a member here I have a right to give karma to and take from other members. I found your post to be particularly bad in the context it was made.

I am not making fun of anything. I'm pointing out what you have done here. If you will go back and reread your post you made a large assumption with no evidence. Who is doing disservice to that title?

Also, you made another false assumption when you flat out accused Emiley for giving you bad karma. I ask you again, Who is doing the disservice?

 

[KelliH]

I read this somewhere, and I do believe it to be true. Most of the time anyway.

People who flaunt their religious beliefs are often revealing something completely different than they think they are.

 

[Southern Wolf]

Can we stop talking about Karma... as this is not the right forum. Or at least that's what I keep getting told

 

[xkissmyhorsex]

The money has been placed back into my account. Thank you Emiley for closing your dispute. I do apologize for "trying to keep your payment hostage" as that was not my intention.


As for the rest of you, mocking my sister, Sister Kathy, and slandering her good name, I only hope that heaven or hell - wherever you may end up, that you reap good and well what you rightfully deserve. This is only the beginning of our time and slaughtering the name of one of God's most beloved children is not a good way to begin.

 

[Emileypaige776]

Charles Darwin is my god. And I'm his most beloved child and by making this thread you're disgracing my name. But you don't hear me preaching it up.

She is your sister? or is she your Sister? Or both? The whole sister thing is confusing me!

 

[scaledverts]

The money has been placed back into my account. Thank you Emiley for closing your dispute. I do apologize for "trying to keep your payment hostage" as that was not my intention

Great, that's a good start.

Now give her the rest of her money back. Despite her saying she doesn't care if she gets it back, YOU OWE HER $11. She is being the bigger person here and not making a huge deal out of the fact that you took her money. However, that does not negate the fact that you still owe it to her in my (and many others') eyes.

You really have no excuse now that the dispute is closed because you can now refund the remaining money with a partial refund without fees the way you should have to start.

 

[xkissmyhorsex]

Now give her the rest of her money back. Despite her saying she doesn't care if she gets it back, YOU OWE HER $11. She is being the bigger person here and not making a huge deal out of the fact that you took her money. However, that does not negate the fact that you still owe it to her in my (and many others') eyes.

You really have no excuse now that the dispute is closed because you can now refund the remaining money with a partial refund without fees the way you should have to start.

Paypal deposited $289 into my account, meaning she has her $11 back. They refunded my 'pay backs' to her, so she indeed has her original $300. Here are the two emails I got from paypal (there are two because my 'pay backs' were sent in two payments.)

#1

Dear Bridgette Taccolini,

PayPal has concluded our investigation of the following Buyer Complaint:


Buyer's name: Emiley Jones
Buyer's email: [email protected]
Transaction ID: 5S249309K4476280U

Transaction date: Feb 24, 2011
Transaction amount: $300.00 USD
Your transaction ID: 8DP726561V6431929
Case number: PP-001-228-976-951

Refund amount: $229.00 USD



Because the buyer has reported that the claim has been amicably resolved,
this case has been closed.

Thank you for your cooperation with our investigation.

Sincerely,

Protection Services Department


#2

Dear Bridgette Taccolini,

PayPal has concluded our investigation of the following Buyer Complaint:


Buyer's name: Emiley Jones
Buyer's email: [email protected]
Transaction ID: 5S249309K4476280U

Transaction date: Feb 24, 2011
Transaction amount: $300.00 USD
Your transaction ID: 8DP726561V6431929
Case number: PP-001-228-976-951

Refund amount: $60.00 USD



Because the buyer has reported that the claim has been amicably resolved,
this case has been closed.

Thank you for your cooperation with our investigation.

Sincerely,

Protection Services Department

 

[Emileypaige776]

I only got $289 back boss. The eleven bucks has vanished. Who cares. I prob would have spent it on crack or something anyways. That was a joke. Crack is horrible and you should never do it. It rots your teeth. Then you will never find a prom date. Then you will never get married. Then you will do reptiles for the rest of your life!!!

 

[xkissmyhorsex]

Charles Darwin is my god. And I'm his most beloved child and by making this thread you're disgracing my name. But you don't hear me preaching it up.

She is your sister? or is she your Sister? Or both? The whole sister thing is confusing me!

No, I don't hear you preaching, I don't hear anyone preaching.

Definition of the word god as found in Websters: the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.

I would love to hear you dispute how Darwin is your god. :eek3:

And you have disgraced my name as I have yours so in your world of Darwinism, all should be well.

 

[Emileypaige776]

And it is all well.

So is she your sister or not?

 

[scaledverts]

I only got $289 back boss. The eleven bucks has vanished. Who cares. I prob would have spent it on crack or something anyways. That was a joke. Crack is horrible and you should never do it. It rots your teeth. Then you will never find a prom date. Then you will never get married. Then you will do reptiles for the rest of your life!!!

*Sigh* , wanna try again Brigette?

The way those emails looked they closed the disputes it really doesn't say anything about refunding $300. Throw up another screen cap to support your case.

 

[Lucille]

As for the rest of you, mocking my sister, Sister Kathy, and slandering her good name, I only hope that heaven or hell - wherever you may end up, that you reap good and well what you rightfully deserve. This is only the beginning of our time and slaughtering the name of one of God's most beloved children is not a good way to begin.

You are bizarre in the lengths you will go to, to get the attention off the fact that you tried to force your buyer to buy something entirely different from the deal y'all made.

You did not even read, obviously, what Dennis wrote about the 'sister' deal. But the subject here is you and we are going to make sure that you do not create any little attention diverters.

As far as reaping what one deserves, let me make you this promise: if I ever notice another BOI thread about you, I will post a link to this one so that readers can see what happened, and you can reap what you sowed here.

 

[Dennis Hultman]

I derailed this topic with my comments so I will differ moderating this thread to another. I would advise that the topic of religion be left for elsewhere and the main topic of this thread be brought back on course.

 

[xkissmyhorsex]

*Sigh* , wanna try again Brigette?

The way those emails looked they closed the disputes it really doesn't say anything about refunding $300. Throw up another screen cap to support your case.

I dont know what happened to the $11 and to be honest I couldnt give less of a I showed you what I was refunded and I dont know or care what happened to the rest of it.

Eleven dollars... really?

 

[xkissmyhorsex]

You are bizarre in the lengths you will go to, to get the attention off the fact that you tried to force your buyer to buy something entirely different from the deal y'all made.

You did not even read, obviously, what Dennis wrote about the 'sister' deal. But the subject here is you and we are going to make sure that you do not create any little attention diverters.

As far as reaping what one deserves, let me make you this promise: if I ever notice another BOI thread about you, I will post a link to this one so that readers can see what happened, and you can reap what you sowed here.

I have read each and every post several times, but perhapse you did not. As for me trying to divert attention, did you not bother to read the apology that was directed solely at the main conflict (which I'm trying to avoid, remember) directly above what you quoted?

 

[Lucille]

I have read each and every post several times, but perhapse you did not. As for me trying to divert attention, did you not bother to read the apology that was directed solely at the main conflict (which I'm trying to avoid, remember) directly above what you quoted?

Really? Please link to the post where you apologized for trying to force the OP to buy a different deal than the one she bargained for. Where you unilaterally tried to make choices about what she was going to purchase.