• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

The stubenville fiasco

Hmm, this must of been posted on the wrong thread. I can't find where anybody stated that.

Dennis, some people aren't smart enough to just read what's written, they have to decide what the writer REALLY meant. We've seen it here time and again.

This person, who is no doubt quite vile in person, is welcome to her opinion, no matter how wrong it is.

Those of you who know me know what I meant. Those of you with more than the brains of a gnat, whether you know me or not, know what I meant. Those who are simply militant for the sake of attention, well, we have seen abundantly what they know; only what they WANT to know, facts in evidence not withstanding.

I'm not going to bother saying it again, some folks don't want to understand ANY point of view but their own. This is in clear evidence here.

If something happened to you, vile woman, that is not the fault of me or any of my male relatives nor the females either, quite the opposite in fact. You know what I wish for you and YOUR family, oh vile one?

Peace. Nothing more nothing less. I hope when it finds you, you don't crush it for lack of recognition, something you seem to thrive on doing.
 
You know, I've been pondering this vile woman, if indeed she is a she at all, and I don't but the "I came here to look for reptiles and found this thread."

It's a bit too far fetched to believe that this thread, which was buried pretty deep, was found by a brand new member looking for animals.

Now a troll, that I could see. Or someone looking to tweak my nose, I could see that too, but it just doesn't make sense that this thread was found as he/she/troll said.

I think you're a big fat liar, vile woman, or man, or troll, whatever you may be.
 
Basking in rape culture?
I've turned away women I was attracted to, because I felt they were too drunk. Some were offended at the time, but thanked me later. Some returned, sober, because their interest wasn't based on inebriation.
Yes, I said that particular young woman bore the responsibility for her level of drunkenness...No, I did not express any condoning of the fact that she was raped because of that drunkenness. Would she still have been raped if she had not been so incapacitated? Probably not; at least on that particular night, by those particular young men. That is recognition of fact, nothing more. It doesn't mean I am blaming her for being raped...the only blame I assign her is for being passed out drunk; and that is without regard for what happened as a result. It wouldn't matter whether she had scraped her skin in a fall, crashed a car, or whatever else might have befallen her. Frankly, it could be argued that she's lucky to be alive (no, that is not saying she's lucky that she only got raped - don't even try that one); so hopefully she learned a valuable lesson about alcohol...and about self preservation.
 
and I find another place for men to blame women for the brutal acts committed against them.

And sweetie, I know that there are bad people in the world, and we need to protect ourselves. The sad thing is that when it comes to rape, it's not about teaching BOYS NOT TO RAPE, IT'S ABOUT TEACHING GIRLS HOW TO PROTECT THEMSELVES. You're saying that men cannot control themselves. They don't have compassion or rational thought. It's up to women to keep themselves safe. Men are dangerous animals. I'm not surprised you don't understand why this is wrong.

No matter how you try to say you aren't blaming her, you are. You're willfully ignorant, and that's a sad thing.

A WOMAN WHO IS RAPED IS NEVER WRONG. SHE CAN WEAR WHAT SHE WANTS. DRINK WHAT SHE WANTS. BE ALONE ALL SHE WANTS. It is not her fault that a man chooses to rape her.

I'm done with this thread. Have fun patting each other on the backs, basking in rape culture, and being no more enlightened than you were a few days ago.

Sweetie, Oops, can I call you sweetie as well or will I be basking in some sort of male chauvinism culture?

You keep stating positions that people simply aren't stating.

Nobody stated that women can't wear what they want, drink what they want or do what they want and if they do, they are at fault for being raped. Nobody here stated that poor choices is the blame for the rape. The mere mentioning of those decisions does not equate to blame.

What you are stating is because there was a rape nobody can mention poor decisions that were made. Nobody is using those decisions to excuse the rape.

I will probably repeat myself over and over again here in the hopes that you grasp what is actually being stated not what you read into it.

Harald made some very good points on that.

Like what he stated, if my underage daughter went out and was so drunk she was carried home and nothing happened to her, I would be safe in stating she made a poor decision. She shouldn't have lost control of herself, shouldn't have been drinking in the first place. A parent would address this as they see fit. I wouldn't be happy she put herself in such a position (nothing to do specifically with rape). Add on top of that, if she was carried home by people she didn't even know well.

Would I be safe in stating to my daughter she made a poor choice? Would that be OK with you? Or should I just be happy my teenage daughter is falling down drunk? She did no wrong? No rape in this situation so I'm free to comment on the bad choices, right?

If the unthinkable happened and she was abused, by your positions, I can't even address the fact that she made some poor decisions because you feel that would actually be placing the blame on her for the rape. Nobody here is stating that. The abuser is responsible for the abuse, period. It doesn't change the facts and decisions made in either scenario.

Being not in control of your body is a fact in both.

The mugging example is spot on.

It doesn't matter what I wear, what I do peacefully. Assault against a peaceful person is wrong. If I want to walk down any street, anywhere with thousands of dollars in my hands extended outwards screaming I have thousands of dollars, I should have the right. It's mine and stealing or harming others is wrong. What if I was drunk too?

Unfortunately, the world isn't like that. Many would state that I was irresponsible and I'm lucky I wasn't robbed. I made a bad decision. I opened myself up to abuse. I would believe they are right.

If I was robbed or passed out on the street, I probably wouldn't get much sympathy and people would state I made a bad choice. What if I was shot and killed for the money? Nobody would say that it was OK to shoot me or that I deserved it (maybe some) but I think my choices would be talked about and discussed.
The sad thing is that when it comes to rape, it's not about teaching BOYS NOT TO RAPE, IT'S ABOUT TEACHING GIRLS HOW TO PROTECT THEMSELVES.

The problem is your advocating not teaching girls anything.

Yes, girls should be able to do everything you mention and still not get raped. Yes, people should be able to hold their money in their hands and not be harmed. Yes, I should be able to able to walk in any neighborhood at night and not get robbed.

They all happen anyway!! Yes, boys should know (duh!) that it is wrong to rape a girl. Even if they know, there are going to be those that are criminals, abusers, murderers what have you.

We teach are children how to avoid other dangers, there is nothing wrong with teaching girls how to minimize putting themselves in a vulnerable position as well. That's not blaming women for the crime. That's using common sense precaution.

I would tell my daughters not to walk around in a crime ridden neighborhood in the middle of the night. If they are robbed, it doesn't excuse the robber but they did not use good judgment.

I would tell my daughters not to drink themselves unconscious. If something terrible happened, it doesn't excuse the crime but they also didn't use good judgment.

You would simply say they did nothing wrong. They most certainly didn't deserve to be raped but they didn't minimize their exposure to bad people.
That is simply all that was stated here. In that sense, it was a bad choice. People shouldn't have to fear or walk on their tippy toes to point that out.

But you can't even state that it is wise to minimize your exposure with you.
You have to say simply "they did nothing wrong".

I'm sure you know rape usually has nothing to do with sex. It is about power. What more can a rapist want then a powerless person who isn't in control of herself. It is wise to teach your children such.
ABOUT TEACHING GIRLS HOW TO PROTECT THEMSELVES. You're saying that men cannot control themselves. They don't have compassion or rational thought. It's up to women to keep themselves safe. Men are dangerous animals. I'm not surprised you don't understand why this is wrong.
I'm a parent(boys and girls), and damn well will teach my girls to do what they can to keep themselves safe. To minimize threats. That's a part of a parents JOB description. That doesn't mean men are any of those things you stated but criminals and rapists are. That's not the message.

It is just as important to teach your daughters about caution as it is to have boys who know it is criminal to abuse a girl in such a way.

If you can't understand the points people are making here and just chalking it to "rape culture", your not being reasonable.

You come here and accused two people of blaming the victim for the crime.
Neither did. I say, How dare you!
 
You know, I could have left a couple of comments out of the previous post. The whole sweetie thing and chauvinism culture wasn't called for.

I do think some people are like what you described "part of a culture of blame the victim" but they aren't posting in this thread.

After posting, I actually clicked on the link Wes posted in the first post.

If you want to find people that contribute to a "rape culture" take a look at post #162.

The people in the screen capture deserve to be targeted. They are the contributors, and are the filth and scum you seek to correct.

You want to track any of those people down online? I would be willing to go with you and tear them a new one.

Verbally of course....
 
A buddy of mine up near Baltimore drinks too much. He enjoys the night life, and has some kind of pain he seems to be trying to drown. He goes into the city, drinks till closing, then walks home almost oblivious.

He has been robbed (and beaten in the process) twice. Both times, he was stumbling home drunk after closing time. He STILL goes out there and I'd have to say the odds are good that he will again be attacked on some dark and blurry night.

Robbery is a crime, and the person(s) who robbed him were quite obviously criminals, but it is very clear he DOES share some responsibility in what happens to him.

He put himself in this position of vulnerability, intentionally or unintentionally, doesn't matter, and contributed to the factors that led to his assaults. Wrong neighborhoods. Wrong time of day. Wrong state of mind. All factors of his own choosing. He was victimized by these criminals the same way a drunk driver is victimized by a tree - it's a hazard to be associated with the (mis)behavior.

I see zero difference in this situation vs the Stubenville situation.

Clearly the rapists are criminals and what they did cannot be excused. Unfortunately, the victim's self chosen timing and location afforded them opportunity and her self-induced condition increased her own vulnerability. Without even considering how she behaved prior to blackout or how she dressed for the occasion, she herself had begun to set up conditions unfavorable to her well being. In my opinion, she DOES share a portion of the blame. None of the guilt, but definitely some of the blame.

Anybody here walk dark city streets in high crime areas at night without anticipating trouble?

Where is that old fable about the fox carrying the scorpion across the flooded stream. "... but you knew I was a scorpion."
 
Where is that old fable about the fox carrying the scorpion across the flooded stream. "... but you knew I was a scorpion."

think it was a frog carrying a scorpion not a fox, the fox story i think was the gingerbread man.. but back on topic, it was wrong of the guys to do that to her very wrong but i feel maybe a little more self control could of been added on how much she drank. the boys need longer sentencing as they did prey on her. as well as the other people at the party and didn't do anything.
 
sorry for the double post and the brief off topic found the story of the frog and the scorpion.

The Scorpion and the Frog

A scorpion and a frog meet on the bank of a stream and the
scorpion asks the frog to carry him across on its back. The
frog asks, "How do I know you won't sting me?" The scorpion
says, "Because if I do, I will die too."

The frog is satisfied, and they set out, but in midstream,
the scorpion stings the frog. The frog feels the onset of
paralysis and starts to sink, knowing they both will drown,
but has just enough time to gasp "Why?"

Replies the scorpion: "Its my nature..."
 
I have 3 sons, 2 are adults and one is a teenager, my sons have been raised and taught that women should be protected if they need protecting. I would literally beat the unholy crap out of them if they ever hurt a woman in anyway. On the flip side of that coin, I have also taught them not to take abuse from a woman either ...

That is neither here nor there ...
The young woman made very bad choices that night, does that mean she should have been raped? Hell no. We don't live in a perfect society, so when you make bad decisions sometimes bad things can happen to you. I know this, for a fact that when you drink too much ... ANYTHING can happen to you when you are defenseless. Should it happen, no ... again we are not living in a perfect world.

I am the very last person to blame the victim, being one myself so many years ago. If I hadn't drank so much & been where I was ... you get the picture.

It is a good thing to teach our girls how to protect themselves & be aware of their surroundings.

Wes, I understood exactly what you were saying.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top