Seems as if the buyer became rude and threatening, the seller took a hard line stance then refunded the money.
Elissa would have probably had better results not threatening Tad but trying to work it out with him in a calmer more respectful manner.
It was said you threatened to tarnish the reputation of Captive bred excellence.
You posted a paypal receipt for $125.00 on a pair of bp's that were posted at $175.00
After the confusion captive bred excellence did the right thing by refunding you, you did the right thing by returning the bp's.
End of story!
How about the most important thing...the pair of bp's bouncing around in a hot or cold box.. seems like the focus is on the money,the bad experience etc,etc.
I do agree that he could have let her have the pair for what she sent($125.00) but also wonder if she made a mistake sending $125.00 when the ad clearly said $175.00 ?
Unfortunately, these don't appear in the order in which is like to address them; but I'm on a mobile device, and won't be screwing around with shifting the order.
Ed,
Are you trying to play devil's advocate in this thread? When compared to the posts, and the facts as they have been presented, your posts don't make much sense.
The OP made an offer of $125 for the snakes. There may have been some confusion regarding specifically which snakes she wanted; but that was clarified in the subsequent messages. The money was sent, along with a specific notation about the snakes. The snakes were picked up at the seller's home. Are you really suggesting that it isn't the seller's responsibility to hand over the correct animals, or to ensure that the correct payment has been received? The time for him to address any discrepancies was before the animals left his possession.
Frankly, I'm surprised that this seller would have, even for a moment, thought it was acceptable to contact the buyer for more money the day after sending the snakes to their new home. He made a mistake - it happens - but nobody in his right mind would think it is okay to contact the buyer the day after delivery asking for more money or the return of the animals.
This thread IS about the experience, the money, etc,etc. The seller didn't ship them, so how they got from from point A to point B isn't his responsibility.
The seller doing the right thing in this case would have been either addressing the discrepancy before the transfer....preferably before the person picking them up was standing at his door; OR, figuring it out after the fact (as he did), chastising himself for his error, and not expecting the buyer to reach into her pocket to fix his mistake.
Unless there is a big piece of this story missing or misrepresented (which is unlikely, given the seller's participation), the seller blew this one. 100% wrong from contacting the buyer to request more money right through showing at Sarah's door to collect them. Giving the refund wasn't "the right thing"; it was simply a requirement for taking the snakes back.
Tad, it was once said, and often repeated, that it's easy to be a "good guy" when everything goes well...it is how one handles the problems that really tells the tale. You asked earlier if you were 100% wrong, and if there was a compromise. FWIW, in my opinion, you were 100% wrong. You were correct that it probably won't have a long lasting impact on your sales; but it will always be there as the time you dropped the ball. You've said that you don't need the money - why not turn this whole thing right back around? Bring the snakes back to Sarah, or ship them to Elisa (on your dime, because this mess should never have happened); recollect the $125 that you originally agreed upon for the snakes; and chalk this whole thing up as a lesson learned. Obviously, that will depend on them being willing to deal with you after that debacle; but it is (IMO) the "right thing to do".