Post #2 includes screenshots of him admitting to escapees. Post #18 has a screenshot in which Jim acknowledges that there will always be animals escaping from his facility. Cage design that allows for wild bugs to get in will allow babies to escape and he says he is content with his system. Perhaps it is not as deliberate as opening the cage and letting them out himself, but he clearly recognizes the design flaw, knows animals are escaping, and says he is OK with it. That seems pretty deliberate in my opinion.
I am aware, and have already made a statement, re. Jim having admitted to escapes.
Problem is that certain people speculated, embellished, etc., and started making claims that Jim was/is releasing chams. Stating this, among other accusations, as though it were 100% factual.
There is nothing, in the screenshots, that proves Jim was/is doing so. No admittance, to having released chams, either.
I remember where Jim had made statements re. the design flaw, of his outdoor enclosures, which enabled the escape of baby chams. Baby chams that hatched from eggs that were missed when egg collection/s took place.
I also remember his statement of being okay/content with it (with some, or less, escapes?). Will have to double check but I believe that statement followed right after Jim's claim of having done something to lessen the design flaw & escapes.
Although, in this thread, he claimed to having fixed the flaw issue (seemingly where there would be no escapes).
I guess it would be nice if we had before, & after, photos of Jim's enclosures. As it stands, all we have is his word.
If Jim has not done something, to make his enclosures 100% escape proof, then I will agree, with you, in that this is a problem and irresponsible.
It does not, however, make it right for people to make false accusations, spread speculative allegations as though 100% factual with no proof, or to attack Jim in such a venomous manner as some people have.