• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Scammed by Andrew Michael Popp Las Vegas, NV

Also Nick,

I want to bring up a few circumstantial items with regards to this member, Andrew Popp.

In a past post, I noticed he listed a turtle and put in the description that he thinks the turtles are het albino. I believe they are tortoises, and I dont know much about tortoises.

Anyway, he also sent me three turtles that are undersized tremendously, and on the July post, he stated they had sold, but also, he listed three turtles, two of which are the same turtle (in the photos).

But also he waited six months, and listed the same three turtles with dramatic characteristics that inflate the value.

So, in a different light, I would think with Faunas dedication to weeding out scamming, having nothing to do with me, I would think these factual discrepancies in his listing would put him in violation.

I have no dog in that fight, and Im not here to run the website. But I at least wanted to point these items out.

Do you have anything more specific about the tortoise listing?

As for the site's operation, April covered it well.
 
I do not know if they are or are not the same turtles, but incorrectly measuring once can conceivably go with incorrectly measuring twice.

If I came into possession of a species I am not familiar with, there would be a learning curve. To be in the reptile business as Andrew is does not mean he knows a lot about all reptiles or the conventions for measuring them. I am not by any means giving him a pass on inaccurate measurements or what have you, but these errors are at least conceivable if he is much more a dedicated squamate guy and much less a dedicated chelonian guy.

I am not saying you are responsible for your loss (depending on what comprises that or defines it). The size discrepancy was sort of accepted according to the text and the approximate descriptor gives him some wiggle room, too. The legitimacy of the labeling for the genetics (as het for caramel) is something I cannot even begin to know since it will take test breeding to prove out. You have at least three very knowledgeable guys who are said to disbelieve the label and I can understand and recognize that. The problem with that piece of things is that they do not know everyone, what everyone has, or from whom they got what they have. I know people with breeding projects of caramel/snow sliders that have never chosen to advertise and their hets are as real as anyone's. They can provide chain of custody and lineage information if they want to, but if they did not for some reason (privacy or maybe protecting a source), the turtles would be just the same in terms of genetics. It would have been in Andrew's best interest to disclose lineage/whatever information before the transaction was done. Back in the "courting" phase of the deal, I mean. It also would have been in your best interest to demand that information prior to payment. What is done is done now, though. If Andrew is being pursued through legal means over the matter, he might want to wait to share that information (if he has it; he might or might not have it). This is an unfortunate situation at this point and I am not sure how it will go, but the case is not an easy one to win. That is not said to discourage you, but there was a sort of flip-flopping of terms at points in the deal and that complicates things a lot. I hope for your sake that, when they mature enough and add a little more size, they prove out. If they do not, then there is the matter of the offspring value and splitting that out if the transaction is reversed or not if kept and used to recoup the value difference in the sale. Either way, you will at least be out time if they do not prove out (which is not technically the same as disproving, unfortunately). No fun ahead in my opinion.

Yes, I see.

I appreciate the input, I will attempt to recover. But also, I will be extremely cautious in future transactions.

Obviously, I could have been more careful, but that is water under the bridge now
 
I have nothing more to add about this member, I threw the thought out there, and April answered it for me.

Thanks

April's response was in regard to what the moderator team does and does not do and how Fauna works (as well as where to discuss that sort of topic). That is a matter of site governance.

I am asking if you could provide me with more information about the tortoise ad (or turtle ad) you mentioned that you said Andrew posted. Where did you see it posted? That is not a matter of site governance.
 
It's sucks this happened and I feel really bad but all this thread does is make sure many people won't do business with either party after reading all this. Both sides seem very shady in all this and it's left a bad taste in people's mouths about the business associated with Andrew and that's also unfortunate. But once again I am truly sorry to whoever truly got screwed here we may never know.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
April's response was in regard to what the moderator team does and does not do and how Fauna works (as well as where to discuss that sort of topic). That is a matter of site governance.

I am asking if you could provide me with more information about the tortoise ad (or turtle ad) you mentioned that you said Andrew posted. Where did you see it posted? That is not a matter of site governance.

I went to the Apopp profile and it let me look up all posts, I pulled up one and it stated he believed it was het albino.

I wondered, this guy always thinks it's her fot something more valuable
 
I went to the Apopp profile and it let me look up all posts, I pulled up one and it stated he believed it was het albino.

I wondered, this guy always thinks it's her fot something more valuable

It's a monitor lizard actually,

Which I also don't know much about.

-Chris
 
In post #417 ,Chris, you said you had your male in with "them", indicated you delieve they are all breedable? You said, "I'm very hopeful at least one will become gravid soon". Back up to post #340, where you stated "in a few years, they prove out...". Cut to post #424, your exact words were "they are not adults, everyone agrees on that". And youI wonder why people take everything you say with a grain of salt. I wonder if you actually believe your own lies. Nice husbandry skills there bud.
 
Maybe someone can weigh in on the most accepted way to present animals that may or may not be hets. I think "possible hets" is widely used? Ideally "possible" because the seller knows the breeding and parentage and they may or may not have the het gene.

"I think they're hets" is a little fuzzy. Is it because the seller doesn't really know, or is guessing, or has no idea but it sounds good? However, I don't know if this is indicative of possibly sketchy behavior as much as it might be a lack of experience of the seller with those animals and what is industry standard practice. A more experienced seller might say "this animal was sold to me as a het but I do not have confirmed lineage" or something.

But the rub would be, I think, whether the animals were priced as normals or hets. Jacking up the price due to a "I think it's a het" would be a bit iffy, IMHO. BUT, I haven't looked at those ads so I'm speaking hypothetically.

Not to derail the thread or sink into a morass of other stuff, but have you looked at past ads by this seller? Since the het issue seems to be the problem that you are disputing with him, any evidence of past dealings is relevant, I think.

I really don't know if the seller scammed you or not. I do think though, that you need to be careful that you aren't walking into a bit countersuit by the parties you've named. If those animals ARE hets, and you've posted what you have here, you deserve a judgment against you, including all their legal fees, for libel and I wouldn't be a tad bit sympathetic (not trying to wind you up, just speaking honestly).

Have you considered that if you are wrong, you may have caused financial harm to these folks who are innocent of wrongdoing? There is more than just a "oops, I guess you're not a scammer" if that happens.
 
It's a monitor lizard actually,

Which I also don't know much about.

-Chris

Yes, I looked up all of his posts here and there are none about a tortoise or turtle being het anything aside from the ones you bought.

There was a post about a Savannah monitor. Not sure if it is a hypo or what have you because I see a lot of variety in this species and the lighting for the photos was so-so. At least one other person (Jerine Blissett) in the ad thread felt it was a hypo. Andrew Popp did not seem completely sure himself, but he said he believed it to be a "T+" (albino) or hypo animal.

Ad attached. I am not sure how it relates, but here it is.
 

Attachments

  • SavAd.jpg
    SavAd.jpg
    195.7 KB · Views: 241
Yes, I looked up all of his posts here and there are none about a tortoise or turtle being het anything aside from the ones you bought.

There was a post about a Savannah monitor. Not sure if it is a hypo or what have you because I see a lot of variety in this species and the lighting for the photos was so-so. At least one other person (Jerine Blissett) in the ad thread felt it was a hypo. Andrew Popp did not seem completely sure himself, but he said he believed it to be a "T+" (albino) or hypo animal.

Ad attached. I am not sure how it relates, but here it is.

Even if it's a northeastern Cuban yellow nosed pink tailed sword monkey, when you add pos het, it ads value. Am I correct?

And can anyone confirm if that lizard ever had het, or may have had het.

Sorry if I am straying off topic. And I am not knowledgeable about most animals, and my hobby is primarily res.

I was implying he adds these things, for value. But it's an assumption and I cannot confirm this.
 
Even if it's a northeastern Cuban yellow nosed pink tailed sword monkey, when you add pos het, it ads value. Am I correct?

And can anyone confirm if that lizard ever had het, or may have had het.

Sorry if I am straying off topic. And I am not knowledgeable about most animals, and my hobby is primarily res.

I was implying he adds these things, for value. But it's an assumption and I cannot confirm this.

Nothing about a het is mentioned in that ad or involved in that ad.
 
Even if it's a northeastern Cuban yellow nosed pink tailed sword monkey, when you add pos het, it ads value. Am I correct?

And can anyone confirm if that lizard ever had het, or may have had het.

Sorry if I am straying off topic. And I am not knowledgeable about most animals, and my hobby is primarily res.

I was implying he adds these things, for value. But it's an assumption and I cannot confirm this.

You are not knowledgeable about turtle husbandry, as I addressed in post #448 a page ago. You're obviously willing to breed turtles that are under six inches. Aside from construction, I do artwork as a hobby. I can paint pet rock for you that will look like a turtle of your choice. It will be expensive though, as the rock is het for diamond.
 
I understand getting ripped off sucks. I'm not saying I agree or disagree you were (still don't know). calebroad....maybe just enjoy the turtles for what they are and any het traits that pan out are a bonus. that's part of the fun anyway is seeing what goodies are at the end of the tunnel.
like I said....getting ripped off sucks. maybe do ALOT more research next time before spending so much money. anyone not willing to give up the info, move along.

The size difference in the turtles.....that seems minor to me. keep in mind that ive never owned a turtle in my life (had a tortoise once). I say that because maybe ill be seeing it the same way a judge would be seeing it.

The het traits, to my knowledge (I'm no expert), need to be proved out. I would think at a minimum, the judge will require you wait and see, specifically if the defendant is saying they are hets. that's word against word and the judge isn't going to make a judgment based on hunch. he wouldn't want the embarrassment of making a judgment against anyone only to be proven wrong later.

it seems like you cant take the advice (from your legal team I assume as well) and be quite. just stop reading this all together until you have factual, postable evidence, or you have a resolution to your case.

being in law enforcement school, I would think you have at least the basic understandings of the Miranda warnings?? specifically the part that says you have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. the supreme court has ruled that statements made under Miranda warnings cannot be used in court to help you. they can only be used against you.

same with this thread....there is NOTHING here that is helping you so do yourself a favor and remain silent. the element of surprise is your best bet. your legal team is paid to do the work for you with the evidence you provide. this thread is not doing anything for you or your legal team except making life harder...however minor it may be.

not to be a rude or anything....but the comment chris Kennard made about the het for diamond rocks.....you've got to admit that was the funniest thing youll hear all week. I woke my fiancé by laughing. it should bring to light the fact that you had what appeared to be a serious problem early on, now people are talking about het for diamond rocks. think about that! it should be showing you that this thread is not being taken seriously. it might be looked at the same way in court. I'm just saying.
 
Back
Top