• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Ty park/ ty lizards FL

stay away from this message board.

I believe Ty had no idea how widely read Fauna is, and how many views this thread is getting. I'm sure Ty's acquaintances are talking about it.
I'm sure Ty is embarrassed that his selfish actions are being read by so many, (not to mention the embarrassing legal problems/questions brought on by his running this raffle/lottery) and would like to see this thread go away or stop.

Ain't gonna happen.
 
Let the courts decide before passing any judgement.

Again, you seem to want to convince people that they cannot have an opinion on Ty's selfish behavior, and you are doing everything you can to hush people or tell them that they are not good enough to have their own opinions.
The BOI was created in order to help people make their own judgments. If every Bad Guy here started telling people that they could not judge for themselves, the BOI would not work. But the fact is that all of us can and do make judgments on who to deal with and who to avoid on the basis of information provided and that the BOI helps present information so that people can make their judgments.

And the fact is that statutes and rules apply to and are meant to be understood by everyone. One need not be an attorney to read and understand them.

Here's an interesting statute I referred to earlier in this thread:
charity raffle

Florida has some precise statutes (and plenty of case law) pertaining to 'charity raffles':


The 2016 Florida Statutes


Title XLVI
CRIMES
Chapter 849
GAMBLING
View Entire Chapter
849.0935 Charitable, nonprofit organizations; drawings by chance; required disclosures; unlawful acts and practices; penalties.
(1) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Drawing by chance,” “drawing,” or “raffle” means an enterprise in which, from the entries submitted by the public to the organization conducting the drawing, one or more entries are selected by chance to win a prize. The term “drawing” does not include those enterprises, commonly known as “game promotions,” as defined by s. 849.094, “matching,” “instant winner,” or “preselected sweepstakes,” which involve the distribution of winning numbers, previously designated as such, to the public.
(b) “Organization” means an organization which is exempt from federal income taxation pursuant to 26 U.S.C. s. 501(c)(3), (4), (7), (8), (10), or (19), and which has a current determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service, and its bona fide members or officers.
(2) Section 849.09 does not prohibit an organization from conducting drawings by chance pursuant to the authority granted by this section, if the organization has complied with all applicable provisions of chapter 496 and this section.
(3) All brochures, advertisements, notices, tickets, or entry blanks used in connection with a drawing by chance shall conspicuously disclose:
(a) The rules governing the conduct and operation of the drawing.
(b) The full name of the organization and its principal place of business.
(c) The source of the funds used to award cash prizes or to purchase prizes.
(d) The date, hour, and place where the winner will be chosen and the prizes will be awarded, unless the brochures, advertisements, notices, tickets, or entry blanks are not offered to the public more than 3 days prior to the drawing.
(e) That no purchase or contribution is necessary.
(4) It is unlawful for any organization that, pursuant to the authority granted by this section, promotes, operates, or conducts a drawing by chance:
(a) To design, engage in, promote, or conduct any drawing in which the winner is predetermined by means of matching, instant win, or preselected sweepstakes or otherwise or in which the selection of the winners is in any way rigged;
(b) To require an entry fee, donation, substantial consideration, payment, proof of purchase, or contribution as a condition of entering the drawing or of being selected to win a prize. However, this paragraph does not prohibit an organization from suggesting a minimum donation or from including a statement of such suggested minimum donation on any printed material used in connection with the fundraising event or drawing;
(c) To condition the drawing on a minimum number of tickets having been disbursed to contributors or on a minimum amount of contributions having been received;
(d) To arbitrarily remove, disqualify, disallow, or reject any entry or to discriminate in any manner between entrants who gave contributions to the organization and those who did not give such contributions;
(e) To fail to promptly notify, at the address set forth on the entry blank, any person whose entry is selected to win of the fact that he or she won;
(f) To fail to award all prizes offered;
(g) To print, publish, or circulate literature or advertising material used in connection with the drawing which is false, deceptive, or misleading;
(h) To cancel a drawing; or
(i) To condition the acquisition or giveaway of any prize upon the receipt of voluntary donations or contributions.
(5) The organization conducting the drawing may limit the number of tickets distributed to each drawing entrant.
(6) A violation of this section is a deceptive and unfair trade practice.
(7) Any organization that engages in any act or practice in violation of this section commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Any organization or other person who sells or offers for sale in this state a ticket or entry blank for a raffle or other drawing by chance, without complying with the requirements of paragraph (3)(d), commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable by fine only as provided in s. 775.083.
(8) This section does not apply to the state lottery operated pursuant to chapter 24.
History.—s. 1, ch. 84-181; ss. 1, 2, ch. 88-115; s. 216, ch. 91-224; s. 1, ch. 96-253; s. 1825, ch. 97-102; s. 1, ch. 97-108; s. 2, ch. 2013-2.
 
^ Yup, so he not only conducted himself horribly but he DID commit a crime according to our lovely state of Florida :) Not a major one, but one that would be on his record and cause him problems for many years to come. No wonder he's trying so desperately to intimidate OP into not going forward and having what is clearly - at the very least - one of his goons on here trying to shut her and everyone up about it (yet continues to do so despite it having the exact opposite effect, how many times do you have to stick your hand on the burner while it's on to finally figure out that it's hot and maybe you shouldn't touch it while it is on?)
 
^ Yup, so he not only conducted himself horribly but he DID commit a crime according to our lovely state of Florida :) Not a major one, but one that would be on his record and cause him problems for many years to come. No wonder he's trying so desperately to intimidate OP into not going forward and having what is clearly - at the very least - one of his goons on here trying to shut her and everyone up about it (yet continues to do so despite it having the exact opposite effect, how many times do you have to stick your hand on the burner while it's on to finally figure out that it's hot and maybe you shouldn't touch it while it is on?)
If Ty had competent legal counsel there's no way that he would have advised filing a defamation suit against the OP. There is no "pleading the Fifth" in a civil court trial. Anything that comes out during the discovery phase of the suit would be fair game for the prosecutors to use. There's also nothing stopping Michelle's attorney from contacting the prosecutors to see if there are any questions the prosecutors want answered.
 
(e) That no purchase or contribution is necessary.

(b) To require an entry fee, donation, substantial consideration, payment, proof of purchase, or contribution as a condition of entering the drawing or of being selected to win a prize. However, this paragraph does not prohibit an organization from suggesting a minimum donation or from including a statement of such suggested minimum donation on any printed material used in connection with the fundraising event or drawing;
I didn't fully follow this thread from the start but these stand out as something that may not be legal. I assume that you had to give them money to enter the drawing. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Each ticket was 100 payable to the IRCF
I bought 4 tickets ($400)

Were you required to purchase them as part of their conditions? From what I understand if they are responsible for running the auction, as a non-profit, and you are required to donate/buy to enter to win, they broke that section of the law as well as not giving the prize.
 
Were you required to purchase them as part of their conditions? From what I understand if they are responsible for running the auction, as a non-profit, and you are required to donate/buy to enter to win, they broke that section of the law as well as not giving the prize.



the raffle terms

Sorry about that he sideways pics :) I can't figure out how to rotate them on my phone sorry
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8324.jpg
    IMG_8324.jpg
    271.4 KB · Views: 498
  • IMG_8303.jpg
    IMG_8303.jpg
    288.6 KB · Views: 502
  • IMG_8304.jpg
    IMG_8304.jpg
    284.8 KB · Views: 504
Ah okay, so you definitely had to pay $100 for each chance at the raffle. And it also appears to be sponsored/co-sponsored by the IRCF. I would definitely mention that statute if you haven't already. Seems like a gray area because the IRCF doesn't explicitly state that you had to donate, only Ty did from what I can tell. Their connection to Ty and the raffle still might hold them accountable as well since they were involved with him.
 
Ah okay, so you definitely had to pay $100 for each chance at the raffle. And it also appears to be sponsored/co-sponsored by the IRCF. I would definitely mention that statute if you haven't already. Seems like a gray area because the IRCF doesn't explicitly state that you had to donate, only Ty did from what I can tell. Their connection to Ty and the raffle still might hold them accountable as well since they were involved with him.


All payments were made directly to the IRCF and the IRCF drew the winning tickets ;)

The IRCF was sent a demand letter last month and they did NOT reply.
 
Seems as though it's a second degree misdemeanor, which is only a $500 fine. Other than it appears they may have no other accountability. Your case against Ty seems very strong. I don't see any reason why you would lose it. However I don't see them doing anything with the IRCF other than charging the with the second degree misdemeanor, still a win anyhow.
 
Also to add, if I remember correctly, you might be able to file criminal charges, not just civil. I'd talk to your lawyer if he hasn't advised you about that already. But from what I remember interstate commerce grants jurisdiction for states to arrest people in other states. Him keeping the tegu could be seen as theft and that would allow for your state to arrest him if he has stepped foot or done business transactions in your state. I'm probably wrong though, I didn't pay too much attention to my business law professor. I do know it's easier for the plantiffs to win in civil than in criminal so it might be best to stick to that.
 
Seems as though it's a second degree misdemeanor, which is only a $500 fine. Other than it appears they may have no other accountability. Your case against Ty seems very strong. I don't see any reason why you would lose it. However I don't see them doing anything with the IRCF other than charging the with the second degree misdemeanor, still a win anyhow.

The thing is NOone will be a "winner" no matter who "wins" now because of the amount of legal fees it's going to cost everyone and the potential other repercussions and or penalties that could result in this.

I would be happy with the t + lizard and move on but I am being sued for telling the truth and if it goes to court I will be filing a hefty counterclaim and naming both parties.

in FL There what's called FDUTPA (Florida deceptive and unfair trade practice act) FL 501.203 and
Also laws like FL 768.295 in place as well for situations like this
 
Also to add, if I remember correctly, you might be able to file criminal charges, not just civil. I'd talk to your lawyer if he hasn't advised you about that already. But from what I remember interstate commerce grants jurisdiction for states to arrest people in other states. Him keeping the tegu could be seen as theft and that would allow for your state to arrest him if he has stepped foot or done business transactions in your state. I'm probably wrong though, I didn't pay too much battention to my business law professor. I do know it's easier for the plantiffs to win in civil than in criminal so it might be best to stick to that.

"Him keeping the tegu could be seen as theft"

He has stated he has auditioned off "my tegu" raising another over$5,000.

Hypothetically
If someone doesn't have the persons prize it could be perceived as fraud
 
Yea he dug himself a pretty deep hole. Him auctioning your tegu is actually larceny. Like I said earlier your case against him is very strong. You should have no problem collecting damages. His libel suit doesn't really hold merit. I could also see the court awarding you damages to compensate your expenses, although I do believe civil courts have a cap.
 
My bad, it's not theft, since it wasn't technically in your possession. You're definitely entitled to either the tegu or fair market value of said tegu, the IRCF is responsible for breaking the aforementioned statute. Obviously you cant get that exact tegu that was rightfully yours but one similar should suffice?
I don't want to discourage you, but have you tried offering an ADR method to Ty and the IRCF? It wont be as hefty as court and arbitration is still legally binding. The only issue is that arbitration cannot force them to award you, you may still have to go to court to get that enforced, which typically happens.
 
My prediction: Ty seriously underestimated how much reptile people HATE cheats and bullies. He refused to award her the prize she won and he figured he could get away with it and no one would ever know. He is just digging himself in deeper and deeper with his inexplicable decisions to not fix this and just do the right thing.

So my prediction is, he will do everything he can to jerk Michelle around to make her think she can't go up against him, but in the end there is no way he can support his actions in front of a judge in court. He may well decide at some point to settle with Michelle, with the stipulation that he did nothing wrong and Michelle is not allowed to discuss the outcome.

So keep fighting, Michelle!! Ty cannot hide from his dishonesty and his stealing your prize from you.
 
Back
Top