Gecko_Den
New member
Did I not put a disclaimer of sorts at the end of my post?
I am not Steve, I have no reason to judge him for not paying his taxes, electricity or building rental.
I was trying to point out the way things might have been turned in the article.
If things were so horrid there the local news media would have been there with bells on at the outset.
In 1993 while I was working for the Humane Society we had to "rescue" 106 cats from a house that had been condemned by the health department (it was hardly a rescue, most of the animals were dead or dying). The old lady who lived there was moved to an assisted living facility (and I did not judge her either).
Upon our initial inspection where we determined that we would have to have breathing apparatus dontated for use that day by the local fire department (as no one person could stay in the house longer than 10 minutes even with it) the local news media arrived before we did.
This one waited a year?
Yes, they are culpable if they did turn off the only heat in the building. You don't have to agree with that assessment.
If I create the conditions conducive to causing a percieved problem, I can hardly call it a "rescue" when I liberate those animals from that problem.
I guess we can just agree to disagree about the culpability of the authorities. I'm not looking to start an argument with you Maggie.
It was Steve's shop, it was Steve's animals as someone who keeps reptiles I am responsible for their care and well being. Part of that responsibility is to provide adequate living conditions, food, fresh water, proper temps, etc.... If I was unable to maintain an acceptable domicile for my animals then I am responsible for finding them a new home. If I don't do so and let them suffer for five days with no heat, food or fresh water then I am the cause of their problem. It's called taking responsibility for your own actions, something that Steve doesn't appear to do very well....
