TripleMoonsExotic
New member
OK, I understand the law you state but if the confiscated items were electronics, furniture or normal store type shelf items they would be put into storage until the suite was settled. What I'm going to ask you is what does the law say about live animals and their care until a court case is settled?
I understand what you are saying, I really do. But the problem lies in the fact that a lot of times the non warm and fuzzy animals (anything but Dogs & Cats) are considered "livestock" or "property" and have an entirely different set of rules. Look at the Amish in PA...They are the top producers of puppy mill dogs in the US...They abuse (at least what most people would call abuse) their horses and cattle...Without any repercussions...Because the animals are considered "livestock" (yeah, even the dogs).
Like I said, I don't know what the legalities of live animals and their care while a court case is settled in Pennsylvania is...But I can almost guarantee that the animals and property can not be sold until the case is finished because ownership is still retained by the accused until a court decides otherwise. I do think that if Steve retains ownership, the cost of feeding and caring for the animals while the court case was in process should be reimbursed (even if the court doesn't say he has to, it's the right thing to do)...But I also think that if any of the animals and/or supplies were sold while the case was in process, whom sold them should have to face those consequences.
I can ask my magistrate about this, but I really don't think they'll have an immediate answer because it's such an unusual question (especially in relation to reptiles - I'm sure I'll get a funny look on that one

