I'll just add a little to this, since I do have some experience with Pilot programs at large companies. As an example I will use a specific experience from when I worked for Charter Communications. Now while the services are different the concept is the same. When we decided that we wanted to start telephone service to our customers a pilot program was put in place first to ensure that it would work correctly. We had about 200 customers in variuos states that were signed up for the service. Each customer had to sign a NDA or a Non Disclosure Agreement. Basically it said that if you say or write a word about this service you will lose it and not be eligible for the big discount they were going to be getting due to them being "guinea pigs". Now I honestly can say besides a very small number of other supervisors, the higher ups and the few employees they had on the program working tech/customer service for these people 95% of the company had no idea we were offering any type of phone service. Nor where they ever going to be aware of it until the higher ups decided to roll it out fully.
We had some customers who spilled the beans and we recieved a bunch of calls inquiring about phone service. When the employees(the ones who did not know of it) asked they were told by me and other sups that it did not exist. Charter did not offer it what so ever. I believe(just my opinion) this is the same thing we are encountering here with SYR. Robyn cannot post or show copies of the letter due to the same NDA. If he does I would take a gander to say that it is written in it that UPS will pull the program. Big corps like this use these programs and agreements to ensure things are going to go smoothly and that it can be done without to many problems arising. The mass confusion a program like this can cause at place where they are looking at changing long standing policy is a massive issue that UPS does not want to deal with until it is sure everything can be done safely and correctly. Once they feel it is going good then they will lift the NDA and Robyn would be free to post his agreement or letter for all to see.
Personally I think Robyn should maybe put something like this on the website explaining what it is, I don't mind being a "guinea pig" if it means it will help advance the program to the point of policy change, but people should have the knowledge upfront if they are shipping through them that there will only be a select few that will be able to handle any issues that might arise. Unforutnetly due to the nature of the business we are in and the fact that this is a service that requires the animals to be shipped under this type of program in order for it to see if it works(this isn't something ups can have customers "subscribe to"), the breeders and the animals are the guinea pigs.
Now I could be completely wrong, but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt here and see. I doubt (crosses fingers) that after the repster fiasco a place with the reputation of Pro Exotics would try to pull something like this without clear cut direction from UPS. If they are then shame on them and I will make damn sure I never order a thing from them again!!
Just my 2 cents, sorry for the long post! I'm bored at work