• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

A Holes on Parade

Road Dog said:
Shrap, I pretty much agree with you, people should take responsibility for their actions.
rest of you:........................................................
Click to expand...

Sammy, I do not think he comprehended what you said.
 
If you're referring to that cheap little shot at the end, comparing my intellect to that of his 10 year old, I got it, just chose not to address it.
 
How cute, Sammy found a puppy. Please neuter her!

Road Dog said:
I have had the same talk with my kid.

rest of you:........................................................
Click to expand...

Road puppy,
Now, why did you want to go and do a thing like that. The runt of the litter having a litter.

Please people spray and neuter your dogs.
Especially the ones you find in the middle of the road. They yap all day and chase their tails trying to get ahead, then whap they get hit by the “A holes on parade”.
 
Road Dog said:
Wes, your threats do not intimidate me.:........................................................
Click to expand...

Yo poundpuppy, I have YET to threaten you.

It was simply a bit of advice that you are obviously too bloody stupid to see as the well intened warning it was.

Your every word provides more proof that YOU are mentally deficient.

You come on here crusading for who knows what, as even you yourself have not really explained in a manner understandable by even one with so limited an intelligence as mine, your purpose was.

If you even consider that you are tilting at windmills you've confused yourself mightily. You have basically removed ANY iota of respect you may have had coming into this onesided fray you've begun by being, or pretending to be so well as makes NO difference, sooooo mentally challenged that I ALMOST feel sorry for you as it, it seems to me, readily apparent that you, along with most others who confuse windmills with molehills, are too stupid to know that you're too stupid to understand JUST how stupid you really are.

Have you considered changing your name to roadkill? It is much more fitting than what you're trying to use now puppydawg.
 
Your huffing and puffing does not impress me, and your childish name calling and insults don't really offend me. As for my mental abilities, I test out at 145 on a bad day. Your analogy inolving Don Quixote gets a "C" at best. And I strongly suspect you dont get laid much.
 
Road Dog said:
Your huffing and puffing does not impress me, and your childish name calling and insults don't really offend me. As for my mental abilities, I test out at 145 on a bad day. Your analogy inolving Don Quixote gets a "C" at best. And I strongly suspect you dont get laid much.
Click to expand...

My guess is you meant 14.5 as in POINT, as in not QUITE 15 which is slightly LESS than 16.

I have seen many braggarts boast of how high their IQs are and have yet to meet a braggart that actually had bragging rights.

I'm curious though, just what criteria do you use to determine the frequency with which someone COMPLETLEY unknown to you has occasion to "get laid"?
AND, even more importantly, WHY is it important to you, not to mention how is it even REMOTELY relevant to this thread, which has turned out be about just how STUPID YOU really are.

Next it will be homophobic rhetoric, then the you guys don't know anything, then it'll be the I just came here to help a friend and look how mean you were to me it's no wonder my friend won't come back and on and on and on.

Jeez puppydawg, you are SOOOOOOO original.

NOT.

Can anyone say DUMBASS?
 
Road Dog said:
Your huffing and puffing does not impress me, and your childish name calling and insults don't really offend me. As for my mental abilities, I test out at 145 on a bad day. Your analogy inolving Don Quixote gets a "C" at best. And I strongly suspect you dont get laid much.
Click to expand...

Today must be a real bad day then. You'd think that someone with an IQ of 145 would know that "inolving" is spelled involving and that dont has an apostrophe between the "n" and the "t" (don't). Not knowing about an apostrophe would probably mean a decimal would be beyond your grasp as well. I think Wes' statement of 14.5 sounds closer to the mark.

I guess the lil pup just likes the rolled up newspaper traetment. Sick lil pup.
 
You are the one who brought up the subject of my mental abilities, not me.

Here's the criteria I use to determine the frequency at which someone gets laid:

(W+E+S)(R)= dosen't get laid Where R= # of Star Trek conventions/year

Just for the record, you are also the one who brought up the homophobic stuff, not me.
I am not homophobic, but I wonder what Freud would say about you pulling that out of left field. mmmmmmmmmmm
 
Enough's enough. While I like to see new registrations, I'm not keen on a user having multiple accounts.

"Road Dog," I'm not going to publicly out who you are at this time, unless you continue posting under a pseudonym.

And just so you don't think I'm bluffing... you're from MI, you're a paid participant here, you used your sbcglobal.net email address to register your other account, and your last post with that account was on 4/28.

The beautiful thing about the moderator control panel that was implemented a few months back is that I can easily resolve ip addresses between users. Also, posts from both accounts were made within a very short time frame a few days ago, which would refute any argument that the overlap would be due to SBC Ameritech issuing dynamic ip addresses to their dsl customers.

Regards
 
Ken Harbart said:
Enough's enough. While I like to see new registrations, I'm not keen on a user having multiple accounts.

"Road Dog," I'm not going to publicly out who you are at this time, unless you continue posting under a pseudonym.

And just so you don't think I'm bluffing... you're from MI, you're a paid participant here, you used your sbcglobal.net email address to register your other account, and your last post with that account was on 4/28.

The beautiful thing about the moderator control panel that was implemented a few months back is that I can easily resolve ip addresses between users. Also, posts from both accounts were made within a very short time frame a few days ago, which would refute any argument that the overlap would be due to SBC Ameritech issuing dynamic ip addresses to their dsl customers.

Regards
Click to expand...

You know, it's guys like this that make me consider getting a membership that would allow me to check IPs as well.

Hmmmmm, have to give that some thought.

Ken, are you sure you don't want to let us in on poundpuppy's real identity?
 
Ken, You are correct, I have other identities here. As you request, I'll quit posting under this name. "Jack"
 
Well gee whiz, what do you know. Along with being a total jerk, he's also a LIAR.

Why oh why am I NOT surprised?

So, poundpuppy, who are ya really?

If you're not askeered to tell us your real name, you know, like ALL THE REST OF US USE?

buk buk buckaw
 
wilomn said:
I'm curious though, just what criteria do you use to determine the frequency with which someone COMPLETLEY unknown to you has occasion to "get laid"?
Click to expand...

Maybe he thought you were married?
 
Wes, I placed the ball in his court regarding posting to his identity. As he's chosen to agree to my request, I'll keep my word and not expose his actual identity.

Different situations require different approaches. Some warrant a tactful approach, wheras others might merit an over-the-top style. The original poster never impressed me as being of questionable character, and tact is far more apt to yield positive results in this situation.

I can't say that I disagree with his basic premise, if I understand it correctly. His methodology was what I took issue with. Many of us, myself included at times, are too quick to lash out with testosterone-charged ad hominem attacks when a calmer approach would be far more appropriate. This causes what may have first been a simple misunderstanding to spiral into something worthy of HELL.

Take, for example, the cited thread regarding shipping a savannah monitor. It's very likely that the original poster in that thread merely went to a shipper's website and copied and pasted an entire line of pricing info, and was not actually offering 2nd day as an option. However, that person was immediately put on the defensive and attacked on the assumption that they would ship the animal that way to save costs.

Miscommunication is one of the pitfalls of the internet. While we can see thewords in front of us plain as day, the tone is often harder to discern.

Anyways, let's move on.
 
Back
Top