W.Wedeking said:I like this idea. It is a more possitive approach and a good one, especially if used in conjunction with the original BOI.
The only downside I see to this is that someone can give you a negative rating without the situation being explained. I think we have seen a few "Bad Guy" threads started on the BOI where it turned out that the person complaining was either jumping the gun, had unreasonable expectations or just thought they could make someone look bad and get away with it.
The polls, just as it is in the Traders Ratings, lists the members logon name with every vote placed. This is going to be a "short form" BOI. Anyone wanting the long version would necessarily go off and check out the BOI itself for more details. And no, the threads in this area are not enabled for replies. All a paid member can do is to vote on the poll or the Traders Ratings.
Will abuse take place? Most certainly. But if anyone can come up with some way to prevent it beyond what I am trying to do, then please let me know. Or if down the road it becomes apparent that it is not working, or causing more trouble then it is worth, then it will simply end.
Someone brought up the issue about known bad guys getting the certificate. First off, if the current Traders Rating they have legitimately appears to be indicative of them being a bonafide bad guy (yeah, judgement call on my part, which I am REALLY going to hate), then their application will be denied until such time as they have a positive rating. Secondly, anyone who is an unknown will be given the benefit of the doubt. In other words, you are innocent until proven guilty.
Yeah, this could turn out to be one huge bucket of crap. And it will likely be a lot more work for me. Which is why, although I have had this thought for a couple of years, I was not willing to implement it until I could also implement a paid membership program in conjunction with it.
I'm willing to give it a try if you all are......