• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

about siklback and their husbandry

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have no knowledge of what has caused you to loose respect for Vicki and Rob. They both have been nothing but helpful to me in every aspect of learning about dragons. From my observations of their dragons, physical plant, and their personalities and charactor it does not seem they would intentionally harm anyone or act in anyway that would not be honorable and respectful. I hope you have contacted them personally to discuss your specific issues. IT would appear this should be taken care of on a personal level not in the public forum. They have been terrific with me. I can only go by my observations.... Wishing you the best....
 
hmm,maybe its because they tried to hide that they had adenovirus in their colony and when the truth finally came out that they had known for a long time they tried to mislead ppl about it on their website.there is a thread on this forum somewhere about it.they lied to alot of ppl.
 
puppytoes72 said:
hmm,maybe its because they tried to hide that they had adenovirus in their colony and when the truth finally came out that they had known for a long time they tried to mislead ppl about it on their website.there is a thread on this forum somewhere about it.they lied to alot of ppl.

You forgot attacking and stalking another breeder for trying to help people looking for answers about Adenovirus.
 
Saladragon said:
Sorry, Michele. You didn't forget anything. I should have refreshed before posting.
thats ok,we posted at the same time.i just noticed your post too
 
I had not read that thread before, but I took the time to skim over most of it before I got tired of reading it. To be honest, most of it seems like mud-slinging and it is hard to find facts amongst the fighting.

The bottom line - if Dachiu (or any other breeder) has suffered mass die-offs or other unusual signs of illness in their colony (that persist and cannot be attributed to another reason), then they should come forward with it, and test for adeno if they have not already done so. If Dachiu has NOT experienced problems in their colony, then I don't see why their disclaimer is insufficient to the point that they are considered to be "shady". I believe that they simply stated that adeno is in much of the U.S. dragon population (which initial testing is backing up) and that their breeders and babies are not tested (which they stated in the thread that they don't test all their breeders and babies). I don't think the fact that they have tested some of their dragons at any given point negates what they said in their disclaimer. It was not like they were claiming to the public to be free of adeno!

But - I think testing is important even if you don't have problems - just for information's sake. If there are breeders out there that test positive, but don't have health problems - then that says alot about this virus. But - if information about any colony's health is being withheld, then it will be that much longer before we will have all the facts neccesary to make an informed decision about this virus.

Jamie
 
Valley Dragons said:
I had not read that thread before, but I took the time to skim over most of it before I got tired of reading it. To be honest, most of it seems like mud-slinging and it is hard to find facts amongst the fighting.

The bottom line - if Dachiu (or any other breeder) has suffered mass die-offs or other unusual signs of illness in their colony (that persist and cannot be attributed to another reason), then they should come forward with it, and test for adeno if they have not already done so. If Dachiu has NOT experienced problems in their colony, then I don't see why their disclaimer is insufficient to the point that they are considered to be "shady". I believe that they simply stated that adeno is in much of the U.S. dragon population (which initial testing is backing up) and that their breeders and babies are not tested (which they stated in the thread that they don't test all their breeders and babies). I don't think the fact that they have tested some of their dragons at any given point negates what they said in their disclaimer. It was not like they were claiming to the public to be free of adeno!

But - I think testing is important even if you don't have problems - just for information's sake. If there are breeders out there that test positive, but don't have health problems - then that says alot about this virus. But - if information about any colony's health is being withheld, then it will be that much longer before we will have all the facts neccesary to make an informed decision about this virus.

Jamie
but what they state on their site is misleading.vickie had finally admitted here that she has tested and even posted positive results but on her site she says that they DO NOT test.any person looking to buy a beardie from her will see that statement and not even think to ask her if she ever found adeno in her colony.that is wrong
 
puppytoes72 said:
but what they state on their site is misleading.vickie had finally admitted here that she has tested and even posted positive results but on her site she says that they DO NOT test.any person looking to buy a beardie from her will see that statement and not even think to ask her if she ever found adeno in her colony.that is wrong

As is stated on Dachiu.com:

Our breeders and currently available dragons have not been tested for adenovirus. Adenovirus is believed to be present in many/most bearded dragons, including ours. For those of you who wish to test - any positive tested animal may be returned to us within 6 weeks and a refund issued for the purchase price. *We do not refund shipping fees or testing costs.

I believe the fact that they stated that their colony could contain adeno is sufficient. They also offer to refund any animal that tests positive.

Jamie
 
that is not what their site stated when that thread was going on.they must have changed their disclaimer afterwards because there were many ppl upset about it
 
Valley Dragons said:
. I believe that they simply stated that adeno is in much of the U.S. dragon population (which initial testing is backing up)


im not trying to start anything here, and im also not fully educated on the whole subject, but i believe that when many many dragons that were initially sent in when the test became available, there were LARGE numbers of infected animals in that inital group. And also why many are now stating that MOST dragons are infected. when, its actually entirely possible to have Adeno free Colonies.

Its like, a fix, basically, when in all actuality when most get their dragons tested, they may just come back negative.

Again, im not trying to start anything since adeno is a touchy subject already, but that is SOME of the information that i have gotten in the past on this, and believe that if most people actually had their dragons tested, things would prove out much differently.

Id like to know, what do others think about this idea, or possibility? Do you believe this to be entirely possible? or not at all? I think thats a question MOST would like to see answered.
 
Last edited:
Mooing Tricycle said:
Its like, a fix, basically, when in all actuality when most get their dragons tested, they may just come back negative.

Again, im not trying to start anything since adeno is a touchy subject already, but that is SOME of the information that i have gotten in the past on this, and believe that if most people actually had their dragons tested, things would prove out much differently.

Entirely possible. That is why more people need to test (including myself - I really need to get on that next week!). Without a larger group of people testing, we really won't have all the answers to this.

Jamie
 
Valley Dragons said:
Entirely possible. That is why more people need to test (including myself - I really need to get on that next week!). Without a larger group of people testing, we really won't have all the answers to this.

Jamie


If this IS the case, then i think people will start to make a stand against this virus, and eventually fade those unethical sellers out. All its going to take is some teamwork here from the community as a whole, and to out those who have the virus and warn others against them then :) Its like us BP lovers and IBD. Those people will not LAST in the industry/hobby with infected animals, and if they dont come out themselves, they will be dragged out by their ankles kicking and screaming ^_- we dont stand for that BS!!!
 
Mooing Tricycle said:
If this IS the case, then i think people will start to make a stand against this virus, and eventually fade those unethical sellers out. All its going to take is some teamwork here from the community as a whole, and to out those who have the virus and warn others against them then :) Its like us BP lovers and IBD. Those people will not LAST in the industry/hobby with infected animals, and if they dont come out themselves, they will be dragged out by their ankles kicking and screaming ^_- we dont stand for that BS!!!

I agree 100%. There's no way to know with the numbers that's been tested (or even what issues brought these animals to be tested) if AV is in the majority of Bearded Dragons...which tells me that even the new disclaimer on the Dachiu site is inaccurate and misleading.

Adenovirus is believed to be present in many/most bearded dragons,

This has not been proven and leads the consumer to believe that if most all of the dragons have it then there's nothing wrong with buying one that's infected.

I think the disclaimer should be changed to 'We don't test for AV but we believe we have it in our colony'
 
Please understand that it's not that I don't have the patience but I really don't have the time to decifer the first few posts in this thread. I am also having some health issues and it really hurts my brain trying to figure out what's what.
I would like to know, in plain english, in such a way that I can understand if there was any inbreeding taking place to create the silks. Yes or No.
If you don't have first hand knowledge but happens to be a much better person then myself and read this entire thread AND understands it, I would appreciate your input as I seem to be lost.

Thank you.
 
you are right sherri it is still misleading ,but apparently they changed their disclaimer after that last thread when they ended up on the BOI so its a little better than what it used to say.still word games though :rolleyes:
 
im sorry i wasnt clear sherri,im talking about the dachiu site disclaimer :D i would also like to hear the answer to that yes or no question you just asked.
 
Mooing Tricycle said:
If this IS the case, then i think people will start to make a stand against this virus, and eventually fade those unethical sellers out. All its going to take is some teamwork here from the community as a whole, and to out those who have the virus and warn others against them then :) Its like us BP lovers and IBD. Those people will not LAST in the industry/hobby with infected animals, and if they dont come out themselves, they will be dragged out by their ankles kicking and screaming ^_- we dont stand for that BS!!!

Unfortunately, Alicia, one breeder has already said she currently has a negative colony, and for being honest, she was attacked and stalked, quite publicly.

I do believe a lot of dragons are infected, simply because of the nature of the virus, but I also happen to believe that we still have hope...that negative colonies can be established and maintained with a little bit of work. What makes that next to impossible, however, is that some people are allowing dollar signs to get in the way of doing what's right.

And yes, Michele, there was no disclaimer prior to the thread on the BOI. My impression is that it was only added because of continued pressure to do something. Pretty sad for someone who's supposed to be a leader of this community.
 
Valley Dragons said:
I had not read that thread before, but I took the time to skim over most of it before I got tired of reading it. To be honest, most of it seems like mud-slinging and it is hard to find facts amongst the fighting.

The bottom line - if Dachiu (or any other breeder) has suffered mass die-offs or other unusual signs of illness in their colony (that persist and cannot be attributed to another reason), then they should come forward with it, and test for adeno if they have not already done so. If Dachiu has NOT experienced problems in their colony, then I don't see why their disclaimer is insufficient to the point that they are considered to be "shady". I believe that they simply stated that adeno is in much of the U.S. dragon population (which initial testing is backing up) and that their breeders and babies are not tested (which they stated in the thread that they don't test all their breeders and babies). I don't think the fact that they have tested some of their dragons at any given point negates what they said in their disclaimer. It was not like they were claiming to the public to be free of adeno!

But - I think testing is important even if you don't have problems - just for information's sake. If there are breeders out there that test positive, but don't have health problems - then that says alot about this virus. But - if information about any colony's health is being withheld, then it will be that much longer before we will have all the facts neccesary to make an informed decision about this virus.

Jamie

My major issue with the information readily available right now to this community is that is no statistical data that would support any hard fast position on testing, and even the tests themselves are not exactly bulletproof.
So, no matter where your colony stands, we are still using the honor system here. We have to know our breeders well enough to know if they are accurately reporting their clutch mortality statistics and reporting health problems. We have trust breeders word on testing, lack of testing and any ongoing problems in their colonies.
I know of at least one breeder that said ALL of his animals were positive and he would not be breeding, then wham, everything changes and all the sudden he has babies from known positive parents for sale. Sorry, that still makes me cringe, but in the end, its buyer beware.
I even had one rather precious email telling me that if big breeders weren't going to see what the future holds with research and test their colonies, that "us" little breeders can't really change anything so why try? Sad to say, but as much as I disagree just on principle, he made a valid point.
Are there truly negative colonies in the US? Quite probably. Is it going to matter in the long run? Your guess is as good as mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top