I found out for sure what they were since then, why do you think I haven't gotten my shipment yet? Until I found out I was unable to ask for transit permits. Al ended up getting the exact same animals that were supposed to go to me, except he got them faster because he had FAKE paperwork.
Both species are found in that area, no intergrades are known to occur. My exporter would have sent me EXACTLY what I ordered because I told him how important it was to make sure ALL the paperwork was correct or it could close the whole thing down and the airlines would no longer accept them.
It doesn't matter if they are CITES animals or not, that would have just been another violation. Laws are laws Erik, and we need to follow them. If we don't feel that we can follow them we should not take the chance to import from those exporters.
I have control over what my exporter sends me. He has to send a photo of EVERY type of animal before hand to make sure I have all my ducks in a row.
Al and Joe smuggled wildlife into this country under a diffferent name. It's ILLEGAL. YOU can not condone this behavior, can you? You've imported stuff, it's important to follow the laws. I just can't believe your making these statements. If you don't feel you or Al can play importer legally, then don't.
As for telling the difference, one is dark and speckled and one has bands! It's not hard!
Tell me Erik, what happens if an exporter sends animals and they did not box them according to IATA guidelines? Half the time USFWS fines you and confiscates the animals. You also have to make sure your guy know the proper way to bag them, label them, how many animals per a bag, bag length (for venomous), make sure the box is made correctly with enough air holes, etc. Importing blindly is taking a chance and sometimes you learn the hard way. What is bad is I warned Al and Joe about these exact issues back in Oct. I told the what to watch out for and the issues I had with the exporters. They did not take my advice.
erk2 said:
Justyn -
You sent me that very same photo on January 14th asking me what species they were. I replied to you that I thought it was too difficult to positively tell because the snakes were dirty, clumped together and difficult to see much detail. You said they were collected outside of Kinshasa, I believe both annulata and christyi are found in that area. They could be intergrades, would that make the documents all right or all wrong? You were planning on importing them, would you have imported them as christyi or annulata? What if there were 15 christyi, 5 annulata and 5 unknown or intergrades? If they listed them as all christyi or all annulata who would be to blame?
Then what about Grayia ornata? There could have been some in that picture you posted also, a colubrid mimic. It would be very difficult for a collector to tell the difference, especially from annulata.
There is no way anyone has any control over the knowledge of the individual collector or the exporter or what they stick in that box.
These aren't even C.I.T.E.S. animals.
The reason for this thread is pretty obvious to everyone. Let's move on to something a little more productive.