Rich, I just joined the Hell forum today and let me say, it was quite the eye opener. People who I have had a great deal of respect for are a little bit more tarnished then I had imagined. Given what I have seen take place in an unmoderated forum, I can only say that I am sorry for giving you (Rich) such a hard time (about a matter dealing with site rules enforcement).
Since I am the author of the quotes that Jim has used, and since I am the only one who can accurately inform you of their true meaning, I will elaborate:
The first quote was very carefully worded so as to not offend. I purposely used the word "tarnished" as it implies being in a condition other than the original state. HELL changed my perception on a few people but not in an overly negative way. For those few, my opinion of them, as a whole, is still 100% of what it was prior to joining HELL. Brass is easily tarnished but the underlying properties are still beautiful. That is how I view some of those in HELL. They are still beautiful individuals but I know I don't want to get into a war of the words with them in a no-holds bar arena.
Jim, you have moved from Devil's advocate to Devil's agent. You used to be right on the money but anymore I am forced to take your opinions and comments as nothing more than worthless chatter. I have never seen someone so off base as you especially given the numerous threads here. What a pity too.
Now, we have 2 quotes all from the same person. But, allow me to explain how these tie in together so that it is clear:
Jim, the criteria I used to formulate my opinions of those in HELL are no different then the criteria I used to for you. I feel that you have stepped over the line of common decency (i.e. respect), solely for the purpose of elevating your very own pedestal. You have been given a solid history of evidence regarding Allen's history, yet you somehow feel the need to continue your rather excellent disposition on "How to speak down to people".
I was the one who brought CS's criminal history into his own thread, as it is relevant. If this is not proper protocol then why in the world is it relevant and allowed in court proceedings? It shows a pattern of behavior that supports the original intent of this, as well as the numerous other threads regarding Allen. Oh wait, that's right, the only information that should be relevant to this particular thread is if Allen was charged by the Animal Control officer for maintaining dirty cow pens, right? It's a repeated behavior Jim, a repeated behavior of dishonesty.
You're missing the mark Jim. I considered you one in which I held in high regards and despite this thread, I do appreciate when a person can offer a different view then what is the norm. However, my respect for that person’s point of view is only extended until such time as their behavior becomes obscene or intolerable. You've reached that point with me Jim. You've reached that point with the vast majority of those on this board. Your ability to play Devil's Advocate has now become your very own Achilles’ heel.
Griz