• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

And you all wonder why I have to make the restrictions I do...

Status
Not open for further replies.
For the record, Dennis and to whomever else, I do not doubt the sincerity as to why you are here. For people like yourself, Harrald, Laura and Bryon, and many many others, I know why your a contributor and it's for more noble of causes.

But, I also completely believe that there are certain people who contribute simply for the pleasure of dinging others. Take Ed Clark last ding as a random example. He just dinged Bill & Amy for an attack outside of the BOI??? There was nothing in their posts that should have been deemed punishable. If Ed or anyone else could find something there then those same people could find the veiled antagonism by Ed even responding initially to Bill & Amy's posts. It does not take a genius to see what Ed's motives were.

People like yourself Dennis have proven countless times over that you not only have the intellectual ability to handle the responsibility but also the self-control. Dinging people just for the sake of dinging people is not what the privilege should be about and IT IS for some people.

Griz
 
WE know he has questions that he hasn't answered. If he won't answer them there then chasing him into the other areas of Fauna with these questions is inappropriate. Your post was an attack and had zero relation to the thread.

There should be less concern about the bad guys becoming mods. Why? Because of the weighted warning system. Once they become mods they open themselves up a category in which the warning system can bite them more then it could at a lower membership level.

So let them become mods,the grass isn't much greener and the potential to get weeds increases.
 
Griz,

That's me that dinged them not Ed Clark. Ed's post pointed out a potential problem with their proposal. Bill took it in a direction that was appropriate for the BOI.
 
Griz said:
For the record, Dennis and to whomever else, I do not doubt the sincerity as to why you are here. For people like yourself, Harrald, Laura and Bryon, and many many others, I know why your a contributor and it's for more noble of causes.

But, I also completely believe that there are certain people who contribute simply for the pleasure of dinging others. Take Ed Clark last ding as a random example. He just dinged Bill & Amy for an attack outside of the BOI??? There was nothing in their posts that should have been deemed punishable. If Ed or anyone else could find something there then those same people could find the veiled antagonism by Ed even responding initially to Bill & Amy's posts. It does not take a genius to see what Ed's motives were.

People like yourself Dennis have proven countless times over that you not only have the intellectual ability to handle the responsibility but also the self-control. Dinging people just for the sake of dinging people is not what the privilege should be about and IT IS for some people.

Griz
Bob,

I love ya man, but you blew it jumping to a conclusion on who issued those points. It would have been really easy to actually see who had given warning.

That said, and not directed to you but to everyone reading, I don't know what people think of my motives for upgrading my membership level, nor is it really a worry for me, but in the email that I sent Rich at the time, and he could confirm it if he so chose, I said that I wanted to be part of the solution.

So yes, it was for the "privilege" of being a mod. I haven't been cussed at more since high school, maybe junior high. One person even brought up my long dead mother in a sexual context. It was lovely. That's been the "reward".

Oh, and your post above could easily be dinged for antagonizing a moderator.
 
I did blow it. I was viewing 3 browsers at once (wife wants to go on this knew Kimkins diet, go figure) and I thought it was Ed. For that Ed, I apologize but, had Ed not already had the reputation for doing so then it would not have been a natural jump. For you Alan, I think it was a stretch but you have my benefit of the doubt.

Griz
 
romad119 said:
WE know he has questions that he hasn't answered. If he won't answer them there then chasing him into the other areas of Fauna with these questions is inappropriate. Your post was an attack and had zero relation to the thread.

There should be less concern about the bad guys becoming mods. Why? Because of the weighted warning system. Once they become mods they open themselves up a category in which the warning system can bite them more then it could at a lower membership level.

So let them become mods,the grass isn't much greener and the potential to get weeds increases.

Actually I fully agree with this assessment. It is NOT appropriate for a member to drag BOI issues all over this site, and is EXACTLY why I put that warning onto the roster.
 
Griz said:
I did blow it. I was viewing 3 browsers at once (wife wants to go on this knew Kimkins diet, go figure) and I thought it was Ed. For that Ed, I apologize but, had Ed not already had the reputation for doing so then it would not have been a natural jump. For you Alan, I think it was a stretch but you have my benefit of the doubt.

Griz

Uh, can you say "Freudian slip"? :rofl:
 
Rich, I have given you every chance to come clean, however you have chose not to do so.

That said I have a few questions.

Is it not a fact you went into the tegu forums and removed several of my posts long before I deleted any of my pictures?

Threads like Tegu care sheet, Tegu systematics, Breeding tegus, Incubation of tegus, Taming the beast, and lets not forget the thread Tegu give away contest from last year, all deleted before I removed the first picture. One thing I do find rather odd, you left the thread up where I said I would give one away this year. Is that so you can use it against me later on? I have thought long and hard about this, I can not think of a reason for you to leave that one, unless I hit the nail on the head.
Quote:
Your exit ... Rich: Your deciding to leave this site is completely up to you, but I would appreciate it if you don't make it unbefitting of you.

Quote:
Me: Not a problem Rich, the truth will always be my answer.

Quote:
WebSlave: Not sure exactly what "truth" you have in mind, but it is pretty common around here for some to mistake their own personal opinions as some universal "truth" I don't think I need to go into details.Thanks.Rich Z. .

Quote:
Rich: No offense, Bobby, but ever since that Adenovirus fiasco, you just haven't been the same person around here. Not sure exactly what all happened, as I was only skimming the theads at the time, but I have seen a definite change in you since that time.Sorry to see you go, but I guess you gotta do what you've gotta do.Take care.Rich Z.

Quote:
Me: OK Rich, whatever you say. The truth as being you editing my posts, pulling my paid membership benefits, supporting scum, and playing with my signature. You forget I am a $100.00 paid member? So what part is not true? You tell me.



Quote:
Originally Posted by varnyard Bold: OK Rich, whatever you say. The truth as being you editing my posts, pulling my paid membership benefits, supporting scum, and playing with my signature. You forget I am a $100.00 paid member? So what part is not true? You tell me.
· you editing my posts -
news to me. When and where do you believe I did that? As best I can recall I have NEVER edited any of your posts. Do you have some evidence to support that claim?
· pulling my paid membership benefits - Which benefits are you talking about? YOU are the one who spitefully selected which user profile to use in reference to displaying the membership medallion. YOU also violated a trust by quoting something I said in the moderators forum and spreading it around in the futile hopes of causing damage. So yes, I removed your access there. Since you have publicly claimed you have revoked your moderator status and refuse to participate as a mod, your only reason for being there is likely to be malicious in nature. I can only assume you have done that in the past and will do so in the future. Not that what I say is any secret, but it's the thought on YOUR part that counts here.
· supporting scum - now you are just being silly.
· playing with my signature - No, I didn't PLAY with anything. I deleted a spiteful attempt by you to draw members away from this site to your new home. Do you seriously think I should allow you to promote a site you are admin on in an effort to rape THIS site to get members over there? Sorry, I didn't realize that I was REQUIRED to allow that.
· You forget I am a $100.00 paid member? Not at all. But that isn't carte blanche for you to do as you please even to the detriment of this site. Besides you have already stated you have revoked that status and leaving this site, so what do you care? In my opinion, you just want to make as much noise and stink as possible on the way out the door hoping you have a following that will go along with you. Sorry, I'm just not going to allow you nor anyone else to spitefully post signposts here pointing to other sites they wish people would follow them off to.

Bobby, you are welcome to leave any time you want to. But if I see you trying to cause damage upon your exit you will really leave me no choice in how to deal with it.
__________________
WebSlave

Then I pulled my pictures. I also take it back rich, you did not edit my posts, you just removed them completely. Keep the hunderd bucks, it was a lesson well learned. It shows the true nature of people I did have a world of respect for.

Lets not forget this:

Varnyard: So you are saying I had no right to defend myself? Ed had every right to ding me after he started with calling me a liar, a disgrace to all things good, as well as calling me ignorant.

Rich: If you had kept your response limited to just personal or business aspects, then no, I wouldn't have had a problem with the discourse between yourself and Ed. But once you brought up the bashing concerning Ed's moderation, then yes, you did trip the wire. In my opinion you post was designed to antagonize a moderator because of their actions within that role.

I'm sorry Bobby, but your own words are what I used as evidence on how to call this shot. You really can't argue the point that your post was NOT designed to antagonize a moderator for doing his duties AS a moderator.

Yet Ed, is still hitting the buttons behind this crap, hit me with some more bad Karma, Ed, but don't think what you do now will not fall on your head later on. It all rolls down hill in the end.
 
hhmoore said:


Harald I told you he might not have known thats what happend. its my fault that i forgot to mention it to him that they might fall back out of date.

Bobby i am sorry for not letting you know sooner, that was my own fault, since harald had mentioned to me that, when unstickied, they would fall back into place according to the date they were made.

Bobby is not whining, as his GoodBye post WAS deleted. But he just simply did not know that happened when the posts became unstickied. Again, im sorry bobby, i knew and forgot to tell you. <3 - Alicia
 
You're right, Alicia, whining is not the term I would have chosen...I was adjusting my words for the public forum.
It took me just a couple minutes to pull up all those links, using the descriptors Bobby himself posted here. And he has been stewing about this for how long? I know that if I thought a thread of mine had been deleted, I would look for it to be sure before posting...if for no other reason than to avoid what just happened here
 
Last edited:
hhmoore said:
You're right, Alicia, whining is not the term I would have chosen...I was adjusting my words for the public forum.
It took me just a couple minutes to pull up all those links, using the descriptors Bobby himself posted here. And he has been stewing about this for how long? I know that if I thought a thread of mine had been deleted, I would look for it to be sure before posting...to avoid what just happened here

stuff happens. I know ive been quick to post things that i probably should have looked up myself. I dont feel bobby is looking at fauna a whole lot now, and him having thought that the threads were gone, he probably wouldnt have thought to look them up. Again, like i said. Stuff happens. It was a mistake, and I KNEW and forgot to forward the information to him. That, is my own fault.

I Respect alot of people here, and id hate for them to get into pissing matches with eachother over silly stuff like this.
 
Alicia, you can't fault yourself for Bobby not taking the time to check the accuracy of his claims. This isn't about a pissing contest - he made accusations that were groundless, and he got called on it.
It would be even funnier if he unstuck those threads himself, then got all worked up because they weren't there...Alright - who unstuck the threads? Fess up time.
 
Mooing Tricycle said:
his GoodBye post WAS deleted.

I can confirm that. I saw, and read his post. It was in the Tegu forum. When I went back a short while later, it was gone. I even pulled up his profile and searched his post history, it was not there.

I believe it was titled "Varnyard Out".
 
I believed Alicia about the goodbye thread...but Bobby, for whatever reasons, didn't mention it. My only issue was with the false claims he was making.
 
Mooing Tricycle said:
I Respect alot of people here, and id hate for them to get into pissing matches with eachother over silly stuff like this.
Then the best advice to give them is to say what they mean and mean what they say. And to count to 100 before hitting "Submit Reply" when you are angry or otherwise emotional. Some of the time you might change your mind, not always by any means, but some of the time.

Oh, and if you say you're gone, be gone, at least for a week or two. Bobby keeps coming back to leave another stinking pile of poo, further damaging or even destroying the goodwill and respect that he had gained over his time here before his recent meltdown.

As for Bobby's goodbye post, does anyone recall if it contained an attack on the site or on Rich? If it did then I would have deleted it were I Rich.
 
Jim O said:
As for Bobby's goodbye post, does anyone recall if it contained an attack on the site or on Rich? If it did then I would have deleted it were I Rich.

I don't remember it verbatim, but it was very non-confrontational. I read it and went "what? why?" because there wasn't anything in it to indicate anything other than he was leaving. It was only one or two short sentences, basically "I'm leaving, bye."

No attack on Rich or Fauna. There wasn't anyting to warrant deletion by a mod.
 
Jim O said:
Oh, and if you say you're gone, be gone, at least for a week or two. Bobby keeps coming back to leave another stinking pile of poo, further damaging or even destroying the goodwill and respect that he had gained over his time here before his recent meltdown.


well it dosnt help if people keep mentioning things, or saying things that are to him or about him, i dont think its fair to say, well you said you were gone, so be gone, when things are continually said about that person.

Bobby would have been gone, but this thread was pretty obviously about the stuff that happened when he decided to leave, so i dont think it fair to ask him to sit and be quiet about that.

If there were a thread like this and you were the one mentioned, and you said "im done bye" would you just let people keep on talking or mentioning things about you, or what youve done? Probably not. As far as the sitewide use of fauna, i do think bobby isnt going to be using the site, so until things are settled or not, and this thread dies, i dont see anything wrong with him posting to defend himself. Y'know?

I know id keep posting if stuff was still brought up. *shrugs* but maybe thats just me.
 
Sorry, I'm just not going to allow you nor anyone else to spitefully post signposts here pointing to other sites they wish people would follow them off to.
A hint, perhaps? Did he make note of what forum he would be playing on in that post?
Hell, just to throw out the other option (since he didn't mention that one as being deleted), maybe he deleted it himself. :shrug01:
I guess to be fair, I should ask this one, too: OK, what happened to Bobby's goodbye post?
 
hhmoore said:
maybe he deleted it himself. :shrug01:
I guess to be fair, I should ask this one, too: OK, what happened to Bobby's goodbye post?

If he was no longer in a moderator position, would he be able to delete his own thread?

But I would think that one of the site mods should be able to pull up what happened to it, and who did what.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top