I just think,everything could have been handled in a more businesslike manner.
Donel,
Probably so if he would have chosen to address it. I'm not sure if you read the e-mail he wrote. The way I see it he feels everything he has done thus far (and continue to do) is OK. There is no remorse at all, and he blames everything on his wife and partner. This is really dangerous not only for others but for himself. You know individuals with good feedback, particularly if it is bogus can do more damage than the kid that sends a snake that dies on transit and doesn't replace it. By the time people notice what happened it will be too late. What he did are no petty crimes open to interpretation. He violated the law.
If we are going to judge morals and ethics let's be fair. Do you honestly think it is unethical and imoral to provide information about an individual with the intention to try to stop him from deceiving other people? Would you keep that information to benefit yourself only?
Please read this whole thread. I was the first one to apologize to him when I thought I had made a mistake. I have no problem doing so if I'm wrong. Regrettably he proved us all otherwise.
Take care.