BAD GUY Charles Schuck CSReptiles

[csreptiles]

Charles, I would guess that none of those higher-end snakes are actually in your personal possession.

Considering that this is a BG thread about you, it may be in your interest to prove this claim false.

Again, though, do you have any pictures of clutches/litters you have produced? Is that not your specialty?

LOL naw the question are they mine? and infect I have provided Images of auctions I won saying so, So do you have images and or information supporting the contrary?? If not than we'll figure that as a moot point, like many replys in this thread!

 

[csreptiles]

Spell Check: " replies " LOL

 

[csreptiles]

Charles, I would guess that none of those higher-end snakes are actually in your personal possession.

Considering that this is a BG thread about you, it may be in your interest to prove this claim false.

Again, though, do you have any pictures of clutches/litters you have produced? Is that not your specialty?

LMAO. Nice try. Epic fail at deflection. No, I am not saying BSR is not telling the truth. I am saying I see no indisputable proof you own those snakes. No receipts of payment to BSR, no photos of your own of those auction wins.


You're correct. We don't want the BOI "thinking your lie".

The below images will show you how all those images got bumped in the folder at same, Passing them off as mine was not my intention! and you'll not find image of me STATING REPTILES I DONT OWN ARE NOT MINE!

 

[LauraB]

Passing them off as mine was not my intention!

Of course it was, and is, your intention! Otherwise you would not use the copyrighted photos of other breeders to represent snakes you claim to own ... even going back to the NERD photos and your 2009 post.

"I got hacked; someone changed my password; I never posted that; the tooth-fairy dropped that into my photo album; it's a conspiracy".
Yawn. We've all heard all that crap before.

and you'll not find image of me STATING REPTILES I DONT OWN ARE NOT MINE!

HUH? Of course reptiles you don't own are not yours. That doesn't even make sense.

Wow, so you posted more of Ben's legally copyrighted photos from your FB "some of the rare stuff I own" album to prove ownership? Lame, at best.

 

[csreptiles]

Of course it was, and is, your intention! Otherwise you would not use the copyrighted photos of other breeders to represent snakes you claim to own ... even going back to the NERD photos and your 2009 post.

"I got hacked; someone changed my password; I never posted that; the tooth-fairy dropped that into my photo album; it's a conspiracy".
Yawn. We've all heard all that crap before.

HUH? Of course reptiles you don't own are not yours. That doesn't even make sense.

Wow, so you posted more of Ben's legally copyrighted photos from your FB "some of the rare stuff I own" album to prove ownership? Lame, at best.

LOL those post are from OLD hacked facebook account I no longer had access to, The funny thing are the evidence of some image that has been PLACED in a Facebook of my by mistake or something if not evidence of me taking ownership. Seems the NERD water would have proved that LOL Is that there any commented reference of me stating these reptiles are MINE? Other then mistaking being placed in a Facebook Album??

 

[csreptiles]

Of course it was, and is, your intention! Otherwise you would not use the copyrighted photos of other breeders to represent snakes you claim to own ... even going back to the NERD photos and your 2009 post.

"I got hacked; someone changed my password; I never posted that; the tooth-fairy dropped that into my photo album; it's a conspiracy".
Yawn. We've all heard all that crap before.

HUH? Of course reptiles you don't own are not yours. That doesn't even make sense.

Wow, so you posted more of Ben's legally copyrighted photos from your FB "some of the rare stuff I own" album to prove ownership? Lame, at best.

You've made one obvious observation that I placed images of WATER marked NERD photo in the wrong album WOW kill me! Is there any NON disputable evidence. Ie. a post with me saying these are mine or have??

As for the BSR images you'r referencing, Please humor me and post comment or a image support I DON'T IN FACT OWN THOSE REPTILES?? Like you say " Lets not back peddle " Just post your supporting information or yet another post in the BOI goes down as rambling.

 

[csreptiles]

Of course it was, and is, your intention! Otherwise you would not use the copyrighted photos of other breeders to represent snakes you claim to own ... even going back to the NERD photos and your 2009 post.

"I got hacked; someone changed my password; I never posted that; the tooth-fairy dropped that into my photo album; it's a conspiracy".
Yawn. We've all heard all that crap before.

HUH? Of course reptiles you don't own are not yours. That doesn't even make sense.

Wow, so you posted more of Ben's legally copyrighted photos from your FB "some of the rare stuff I own" album to prove ownership? Lame, at best.

Are you speaking for BSR when stating the above?? Or that I don't own them said reptiles? Franking your sticking your foot in your mouth.

 

[csreptiles]

Back @ you..... The photos you posted here proved nothing at all. They didn't even prove that they were your animals. They didn't prove how you do business. They didn't prove where they came from. They really don't support anything. at face value, that you are claiming they do.



That image is apparently of invoices from a company that is now defunct, and has nothing at all to do, that I can see, with your dealings in reptiles. It is blatantly obvious that at least the one actually viewable receipt is not at all very current, from a company that apparently no longer exists (which begs the question of "why not?"), and in my opinion appears to be there purposely to mislead people into believing that they are receipts for animal sales or purchases.

One does not have to be a practiced authority of image authenticity to simply READ the text shown in the documents displayed in a photograh. And I actually find it interesting that you posted that image as some sort of qualification on your part when it is child's play to look up that business name and find apparently issues that reflect poorly on you even in that prior business. So I can only presume that you had intended and hoped that people would simply skim the image without actually READING what was truly presented.

And when you run this website, then perhaps you can make any rules that you like about how readers can use their own minds to "authenticate" any evidence that is presented before them. Until that time, I believe I (and other members here) can interpret any photo we like in any way that seems accurate and appropriate, if you don't mind.



Sorry, but I just disagree. Your images don't display ANY such facts at all, in my opinion. The ones of animals only show animals. Nothing else about them. Your photo of invoices is apparently at best, unrelated to the issue of you buying or selling reptiles, and at the worst an apparent effort to deceive by implying that it shows something that it really does not.

But be that as it may, my concern here is that I do not want this forum (Board Of Inquiry) used as a photo gallery by anyone, whether it is a "look what I've got" melange or a covert method of advertising for sales. So if you are posting "evidence" then it needs to be pertinent, relevant, and self explanatory about what the photos are actually being posted for.

As for you being a "herpetologist", well sorry about that, but the term means something more to a lot of people other than simply being a hobbyist who plays with snakes part time in their home. As for your being a network consultant, well, glad you are able to have gainful employment.



Sorry, but again, that proves nothing except that you were able to put your hands on several hundred dollar bills and take photos of them. Heck, just because I could take a photo of myself standing next to a Bugatti Veyron holding a card with my name and a date on it doesn't mean that I actually own it. It just means, literally, I have a picture of myself standing next to a Bugatti Veyron holding a card with some info displayed.




I for one, heartily believe that many people reading this most certainly do have their brain matter spinning merrily along. But most likely not in the way you seem to think. As for lawyers, well, I'm sure this would be highly entertaining to them. Especially concerning your definition of what constitutes REAL "evidence".

Evidence enough ? or shall I find the bank receipt with my name on it? -LMAO The good thingabout having facts is it can simple be backup with IMAGE and less chatter!

 

[csreptiles]

"Leaving customers high and dry"

Consistent in all your endeavors.

LOL that reporter research was just about as bad as your fact findings! surprising still no court findings LOL showing up to the business after some tried top break PRICELESS! Look in the window there's nothing there, and the windows boarder up! He must be a member of the BOI too! LMAO OOO yea refused to interview me I also might mentioned !

 

[csreptiles]

I just want to clarify again that there was no way to prove that the snake mites came from him. If animal control picks up reptiles and holds them, they might be exposed to other reptiles or put into the same enclosures they use for others, or they could have picked them up later. There are other possibilities for exposure and mites are something that you have to be prepared for when an snake comes from a rescue. That's why they were quarantined to the best of my ability. I was frustrated at the thought of dealing with the mites and unhappy about the general situation I was in, but not accusing him of being the cause of the mites. I did what I did to resolve this situation and not have to talk to him again.

Regardless, the snakes do all have good appetites and are putting on weight, and after (and during) a few treatments I have not seen mites now for maybe a month or so. One does have an old large scar that left a big dent in the muscle tissue, but seems to be doing okay otherwise. I have also never seen any signs of mites on any of my other snakes, but had treated them just in case. So all is done and over with.

If memory serves me correct, Juts how many of my reptiles when to HOMES NON PERMITTED and or housed in Hennepin County where " Exotics pets including some tropical fish are prohibited ? At the time of your post being one that has fought in court successful defending my right to own reptiles, and since your such a law abiding citizen, Are the reptiles referenced permitted in Hennepin ( Minneapolis ) county or even has been? or we going with the we the " I don't keep my reptiles where I live story already! "

 

[laterob]

Charles, that last screenshot of bank activity...didn't see any Investment grade stuff on it.

You sure seem like a scammer to me. Hacked accounts, pictures that aren't yours "proving" you own animals, flashing cash, gibberish responses,...

 

[csreptiles]

Charles, that last screenshot of bank activity...didn't see any Investment grade stuff on it.

You sure seem like a scammer to me. Hacked accounts, pictures that aren't yours "proving" you own animals, flashing cash, gibberish responses,...

I think is simple, I manage several websites, with business I do on the side and had to give a Developer my account password which was at the time the same on other services and ect. After having to end our relationship he gained access to my account and reset all recovery option. Simple... I just setup another account after several failed attempts in recovery. You can see that by noticing the last posts are in 2009.

If your referring to picture the NERD picture again at no point did I want to mislead another into thinking those are mine, I think is simple o understand seeing the NERD water mark is on the image, LOL How would you explain the reason for me keeping the water mark which can be simply removed in Photoshop, Not that I'm a expert in graphic design but I do employ a few Photoshop consultants for my development work I do. If you look it and understand facebook it albums seems to have been created then tons of images dumped into them at the same time like a phone sync or mass upload which might explain how they got into the wrong folder. What you don't see it me commenting on any of them as to my ownership which would provide you POINT!

So can you explain the -$1825.00 ?? I posted the CASH, and then I posted screen shot form last weeks dealing all good mind you! Why spend the time to time out which one of them have been scammed to provide you point??

 

[aSnakeLovinBabe]

I could literally post a photo of $30,000 cash TOMORROW, but that isn't going to make anyone here believe I am an ethical business person or make them think that I am cool because I could potentially afford expensive snakes. I have dropped a lot more than $1,000 on individual animals before, but you will never see me flashing that about. Honestly, there is something WRONG with your brain to make the connections you are making. These are living beings your are dealing with, not piles of cash or inanimate objects. They're not here for you to beat your chest and holler LOOK AT ALL OF MY EXPENSIVE SNAKES I AM AWESOME. You clearly have no respect for anything. Not for the snakes, not for NERD considering you think nothing of stealing their images, not for REAL herpetologists (calling yourself a herpetologist when you have no degree in zoology? What drugs do you take, seriously?)

 

[aSnakeLovinBabe]

Also, I am hereby claiming that I am now a herpetologist, because I can do what I want, regardless of a degree in zoology, as long as I have a lot of reptiles and have read enough reptile books.

 

[Lucille]

Honestly, there is something WRONG with your brain to make the connections you are making.

With all due respect, I am thinking this may not be the case.
I have seen these kinds of responses in a few other threads, and I believe that those who respond this way do so deliberately, to put a lot of distance in the thread between concrete posts of their misdoings, and the current conversation, so that prospective purchasers cannot see the relevant bad guy posts and instead see a lot of bickering.
I believe Schuck knows exactly what he is doing by making outrageous claims using bogus evidence or turning the tables on posters and asking them questions and making them spin their wheels while his misdeeds get buried deeper in the thread.

 

[aSnakeLovinBabe]

He compared himself to Steve Irwin.

I don't think I have to say anything else

 

[SoCalAce]

Also, I am hereby claiming that I am now a herpetologist, because I can do what I want, regardless of a degree in zoology, as long as I have a lot of reptiles and have read enough reptile books.

I highly doubt he has ever read a book.

He compared himself to Steve Irwin.

I don't think I have to say anything else

Yes! This type of blasphemy by itself is reason not to do business.

With all due respect, I am thinking this may not be the case.
I have seen these kinds of responses in a few other threads, and I believe that those who respond this way do so deliberately, to put a lot of distance in the thread between concrete posts of their misdoings, and the current conversation, so that prospective purchasers cannot see the relevant bad guy posts and instead see a lot of bickering.
I believe Schuck knows exactly what he is doing by making outrageous claims using bogus evidence or turning the tables on posters and asking them questions and making them spin their wheels while his misdeeds get buried deeper in the thread.

That's an interesting point. So I guess it's our job to keep the end of this post reminding any readers that Charles is in a league of his own when it comes to being a criminal. He thinks he has erased his history of shady actions by allegedly purchasing a bunch of high end ball pythons. Regardless of whether or not he was arrested or convicted at any point, we should make a wiki page called "Fauna Bad Guy" and just put his name and picture next to the definition.

 

[csreptiles]

I could literally post a photo of $30,000 cash TOMORROW, but that isn't going to make anyone here believe I am an ethical business person or make them think that I am cool because I could potentially afford expensive snakes. I have dropped a lot more than $1,000 on individual animals before, but you will never see me flashing that about. Honestly, there is something WRONG with your brain to make the connections you are making. These are living beings your are dealing with, not piles of cash or inanimate objects. They're not here for you to beat your chest and holler LOOK AT ALL OF MY EXPENSIVE SNAKES I AM AWESOME. You clearly have no respect for anything. Not for the snakes, not for NERD considering you think nothing of stealing their images, not for REAL herpetologists (calling yourself a herpetologist when you have no degree in zoology? What drugs do you take, seriously?)

Did you not read my post, One of the most famous herpetologist does not have a degree, Did you not read my post? Another moot point. As for the NERD pic like I said they got placed into a folder or the folder names had changed at some point.

I posted the purchases of mine being this thread is about me scamming people on deal I recently done, You are on drug this was very simple to understand! posting piles of cash, I did that after my pictures of reptiles came into question. So I posted cash + purchase. If you think posting a picture of mostly your life saving in something your barking up tree. LOL The cash pictures your referencing are about reptile purchases so unless your planning to buy 30K in reptiles tomorrow there really was no reason to even say you could post a pic of 30K unless , like in my examples it was for reptiles purchases in my pic I'm showing the fund getting spent!

I posted images of cash only which are the cash used to by said reptiles. As far as ethic's go, There is NON In the BOI! I've has false calls to the AC, and I know several member that have posted here here don't even have have legal permits for the reptiles kept.

And with all this said we still are of topic, So I once again will, Other than rambling on on about he say she say, Does not ANYONE HAVE ANY LEGAL COURT FINDING SUPPORT ACCUSATIONS? Or is the BOI just another place for a few people to ramble on about unproven worthless web chatter? Hearsay " at best " I think it simple just go court, it's easy! But then there would be an absolute.

Any deal not worth going to court for is questionable! -TRUTH

 

[JCCS]

Hey Chuck, what peer-reviewed studies have you participated in? If any, what was your role? Herpetologist is a name bestowed on people who do research on reptiles in an academic setting. To my knowledge, Steve Irwin was not a herpetologist, and I seriously doubt you are either. So hey, there is a similarity. Steve Irwin, to my knowledge, was a reptile enthusiast who owned a private zoo that seemed to be well maintained. I do not believe that he himself ran serious studies into his animals. This is not insulting him as I never heard him refer to himself as a herpetologist, just stating what it is. You, however, are trying to come off as owning more expertise in an area than you do. I'm not saying that herpetologists know more about the animals than herpetoculturists, but they generally do know more about academic research than people not in academia. This just adds to the pretty resolute notion that you are a con man, as I believe that you understand the difference between a herpetologist and a herpetoculturist.

 

[csreptiles]

Hey Chuck, what peer-reviewed studies have you participated in? If any, what was your role? Herpetologist is a name bestowed on people who do research on reptiles in an academic setting. To my knowledge, Steve Irwin was not a herpetologist, and I seriously doubt you are either. So hey, there is a similarity. Steve Irwin, to my knowledge, was a reptile enthusiast who owned a private zoo that seemed to be well maintained. I do not believe that he himself ran serious studies into his animals. This is not insulting him as I never heard him refer to himself as a herpetologist, just stating what it is. You, however, are trying to come off as owning more expertise in an area than you do. I'm not saying that herpetologists know more about the animals than herpetoculturists, but they generally do know more about academic research than people not in academia. This just adds to the pretty resolute notion that you are a con man, as I believe that you understand the difference between a herpetologist and a herpetoculturist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Irwin
Do you know, WIKI is consider one of the largest fact database on the web right?

MOOT POINT! NEXT