• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

BAD GUY Charles Schuck CSReptiles

Dennis Hultman said:
All people have to do is start at the beginning of this thread and read all of your posts. All the promises you made to two people that took for ever to get resolved for one and the other you never fulfilled what you stated.

You talk about all companies receiving complaints?

Not all companies or individuals seem to have the problems you do. Many of us know people who have been doing just this hobby/business for 20 years with no complaints like those you have received. Does it mean they are perfect? No, but they know how to treat their customers and others they are doing business with.

You have had publicized problems with every business venture that has been brought up on this thread. From your mini bike business, your problems on the Vbulletin website with the person that designed a website for you. Your two retail locations for computer repair and your snake buying and selling ventures.

You seem to think, oh well everybody has problems and you blow it off.

Sorry, but not everyone has the problems you do.

Maybe, just maybe, the problems are with you and how you handle situations?

Last time you came on here and accused members here of being pedophiles and all kinds of nasty comments.

Your professionalism has never shown here so yes my bias would be that the people in the videos who say not to do business with you, the posts on ripoff report and other forums weigh heaver than you saying you have funds and can purchase reptiles.

So you flash some cash and that makes you great to do business with?
Click to expand...

Dennis Hultman let this be the end of this, below please list to me so I can understand giving all the negativity on both parts in this thread why I still evening after April posted a lie about not getting reimbursed snakes of my indirectly or directly why I should provide compensation? 24/48hr business hours after publicity informed the BOI that she has been compensation and accepted reptiles owned by indirectly, I make the donation of $120 I will not be matching after being reminded of what took place and the shady tactics to in which my alligator and reptiles, cages, equipment and snake food had been unlawfully sorted and giving away to NON PERMITTED people!
 
csreptiles said:
Dennis Hultman let this be the end of this, below please list to me so I can understand giving all the negativity on both parts in this thread why I still evening after April posted a lie about not getting reimbursed snakes of my indirectly or directly why I should provide compensation? 24/48hr business hours after publicity informed the BOI that she has been compensation and accepted reptiles owned by indirectly, I make the donation of $120 I will not be matching after being reminded of what took place and the shady tactics to in which my alligator and reptiles, cages, equipment and snake food had been unlawfully sorted and giving away to NON PERMITTED people!
Click to expand...

Could you please rewrite this,so people can understand what you are saying?
 
laterob said:
You want a Factual proven fact, Charles? You offered a donation and haven't followed through. The rest doesn't matter.

Promise x excuse = bad guy
Click to expand...

This needs to be your post.

True To Fact:
" I AND OR ANYONE ONE ELSE IN THE BOI CAN'T PROVIDE INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE SUPPORTING CHARLES SCHUCK III HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY, CHARGED, ARRESTED OR FOR THAT MATTER ACCUSED FOR ANYTHING RELATED TO HIM BEING A SCAMMER, CHEAT, AND OR THIEF IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM
 
Fact since 2009 there's not been one post and or image of INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE supporting ones claims I'm scammed, cheated, and or stolen anything?
 
csreptiles said:
Now how gave me negtive Trader Rating... I'm selling everyting now!

her I'll make it easy on you all, I am for good... This thread will not effect any thing I do so your netive word and or comment are only helping.... But good or day business is good for me... Man I watched my website and I'v had over 4000 hits and It not even done yet...
Click to expand...

This is priceless :)
 
csreptiles said:
INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE
Click to expand...


Schuck is trying to ride the 'indisputable evidence' pony around the ring a few times.
But the vast amount of evidence both here, and in a courtroom, is not indisputable. That is why they have a 'more likely than not' burden of proof for civil cases and a 'beyond a reasonable doubt' burden of proof for criminal cases. There is always some doubt, nothing is 100%

But by riding the pony around the ring, Schuck would have you believe that indisputable evidence is absolutely a requirement and that no one can hold him responsible for his various misdeeds or hold him to promises he has made without it.

The indisputable pony might work for the gullible, but not for readers here. Readers realize that decisions here and elsewhere are made based on a number of factors, and that is why we have the BOI, so readers can see the information provided by both parties, judge for themselves how to weigh that information based on their knowledge, reader input, how believable each party is, and make a wise decision about future transactions.

The 'indisputable' pony is also in my opinion part of the dog and pony show Schuck is putting on to divert attention from the wrongs he has done. I think the poor pony is pretty tired by now.
 
csreptiles said:
This needs to be your post.

True To Fact:
" I AND OR ANYONE ONE ELSE IN THE BOI CAN'T PROVIDE INDISPUTABLE EVIDENCE SUPPORTING CHARLES SCHUCK III HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY, CHARGED, ARRESTED OR FOR THAT MATTER ACCUSED FOR ANYTHING RELATED TO HIM BEING A SCAMMER, CHEAT, AND OR THIEF IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM
Click to expand...

We can provide lots of indisputable evidence that you have been accused of being a scammer, cheat and thief. In fact I am literally accusing you right now. The news video posted earlier certainly accuses you.

Let's throw out your entire history for a minute, though. Let's say you have never committed one deplorable act. Let's even say that you didn't have your animals confiscated on multiple occasions. Your posts in this thread are enough to deter most individuals from doing business with you. If not for nothing more else than can talk communication with said party 1995 is difficult bro. True to Fact.
 
You know, you have to wonder if con artists like this can even sit back and objectively look at what they are writing. I tend to doubt that they can, because if Chuck had this ability, it would become blatantly obvious how bad he is making himself look and how ridiculous his answers truly are. Chuck, your responses are some of the lousiest examples of stereotypical con speak I've seen. I mean, if you're going to go with circular speech techniques to avoid answering stuff, try to do it in a slightly coherent manner. It will be much more effective in your attempts at the slight-of-hand trick you're trying to pull. Have you been talking to the Ballbids guy?
 
Lucille said:
Schuck is trying to ride the 'indisputable evidence' pony around the ring a few times.
But the vast amount of evidence both here, and in a courtroom, is not indisputable. That is why they have a 'more likely than not' burden of proof for civil cases and a 'beyond a reasonable doubt' burden of proof for criminal cases. There is always some doubt, nothing is 100%

But by riding the pony around the ring, Schuck would have you believe that indisputable evidence is absolutely a requirement and that no one can hold him responsible for his various misdeeds or hold him to promises he has made without it.

The indisputable pony might work for the gullible, but not for readers here. Readers realize that decisions here and elsewhere are made based on a number of factors, and that is why we have the BOI, so readers can see the information provided by both parties, judge for themselves how to weigh that information based on their knowledge, reader input, how believable each party is, and make a wise decision about future transactions.

The 'indisputable' pony is also in my opinion part of the dog and pony show Schuck is putting on to divert attention from the wrongs he has done. I think the poor pony is pretty tired by now.
Click to expand...


It's 100% that NO one in the BOI can provide a court files to support any and or all claims in this thread! -smh
 
JCCS said:
You know, you have to wonder if con artists like this can even sit back and objectively look at what they are writing. I tend to doubt that they can, because if Chuck had this ability, it would become blatantly obvious how bad he is making himself look and how ridiculous his answers truly are. Chuck, your responses are some of the lousiest examples of stereotypical con speak I've seen. I mean, if you're going to go with circular speech techniques to avoid answering stuff, try to do it in a slightly coherent manner. It will be much more effective in your attempts at the slight-of-hand trick you're trying to pull. Have you been talking to the Ballbids guy?
Click to expand...

HAHAH you don't get a me all the question as if you this is some official authority. I answered a few now you answer the same one I be asking for year, POST THE COURT FILING?

LOL Agreed there NON VOID like many of opinions here!
 
beyoko said:
I hate to open up old wounds, but I'm wondering if anyone has any more specific info on Charles Schuck III?

He scammed me out of $500 in an eBay laptop computer deal, and I'd love to get some form of satisfaction out of it.

So if anyone knows of any hearings or court dates or anything of the sort that could benefit from my testimony and documentation, please let me know.
Click to expand...

Never did hear from this, If your here post some proof. Fish part is How hard is it really to get refunded from ebay ?? LMAO
 
Made that donation that you said you would 5 days ago (post #1188, remember)?

Does not making a post (or a sale?) for 6 years count as 'still here'?
 
Yes. He tries to compensate for the lack of sophistication with untidy repetition. With the latter being no genuine substitute for the former, it is a self-disservice. Kind of amusing to see a con man that operates on volume instead of intensity due to the lack of talent. Working smarter is not in his essence, so his only option is to pile on. Of course, you can see a well represented example of the Dunning-Kruger effect in his persona, but that overconfidence leads to the aforementioned volume together with the dearth of skill. With an inability to work smarter, he works harder, but the harder he works, the less credible he makes himself appear to observers. The ignorance it takes to commit to that becomes an act of ego preservation. Still, a scammer is a scammer regardless of his psychological faults, so it is good to remember that he aspires to victimize others.
 
Well, Charles, I am about a month away from my Master's in Social Work and have some pretty extensive research into scam artists via antisocial personality disorder, so you could say I know a bit about the subject. I wouldn't say I'm an "official authority", but I'm a long way off from uneducated around the subject. Now, I'm sure you're going to talk your way around this and not answer any question asked of you, so have a nice day avoiding all of your downfalls.
 
Serendipitous timing with the BallBids reference. Another couple thousand views, and this thread will overtake that one for 10th-most views all-time. 121,000+. Oh, but Charles came back to start fresh. Spots on a leopard, Charles...make that donation (like $120 is a lot of money to you?)
 
JCCS said:
You know, you have to wonder if con artists like this can even sit back and objectively look at what they are writing. I tend to doubt that they can, because if Chuck had this ability, it would become blatantly obvious how bad he is making himself look and how ridiculous his answers truly are. Chuck, your responses are some of the lousiest examples of stereotypical con speak I've seen. I mean, if you're going to go with circular speech techniques to avoid answering stuff, try to do it in a slightly coherent manner. It will be much more effective in your attempts at the slight-of-hand trick you're trying to pull. Have you been talking to the Ballbids guy?
Click to expand...

Is it true that you are unable to provide support official court records supporting I'v scammed, cheated and or stolen anything in my life?
 
laterob said:
Serendipitous timing with the BallBids reference. Another couple thousand views, and this thread will overtake that one for 10th-most views all-time. 121,000+. Oh, but Charles came back to start fresh. Spots on a leopard, Charles...make that donation (like $120 is a lot of money to you?)
Click to expand...

Is it true that you are unable to provide support official court records supporting I'v scammed, cheated and or stolen anything in my life?
 
Back
Top