• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Beware: Chuck Kimmel, Critterkeeper & Critical Bill

I have not seen any scams pulled by him, that is not what this is about. He is Personality Challenged! I think everyone should know that he is obnoxious, vulgar, vile, pathetic, repugnant and extremely degrading to women. Ladies we must all stick together against someone so pathetic!
Click to expand...
WTF??????

I have actually done business with Chuck Kimmel. His communication was excellent, he paid as agreed and on time, he called me promptly to let me know what he bought arrived safely and he was happy with the transaction. He even gave positive feedback. So, from a business standpoint, Chuck Kimmel is a "Good Guy", IMO.

Is Chuck Kimmel rude, crude, and over the top at times? Well.... yes! I feel like slapping the snot out of him and washing his mouth out with soap for some of the stuff he posts here on Fauna. Does this make him a Bad Guy that warrants a Bad Guy thread on the BOI? Nope. Just because he rubs someone the wrong way or has a potty mouth does NOT warrant a thread like this one.

Get over it.
 
Originally Posted by Varnyard:
As for Robert, have you dealt with Chuck? Or do you have something new to bring to this thread over a deal? No, you do not, so it must be trolling 110%.
That said, I will not let this troll bash him because he is just wanting to troll. Do you think Robert's actions are justified? To bump very old threads because he don't like Chuck? How sad....
Click to expand...
No I have never dealt with Chuck and never will.
I have nothing new to add to this thread over a deal. Like I said, how many threads are started and/or bumped based on character, ethits, and integrity issues as opposed to deals. Wes started a thread on Ed Clark without having anything new to add over a deal. Is that trolling 110% Bobby? Careful now, you are his pet monkeys pet monkey.
You can't stop this "troll" from bashing him. Are my actions justified? I believe so. I never said I don't like Chuck. It is he who does not like me and that is fine. If he insist on calling me names and attacking me everytime I post, I will copy, paste, and bump this thread. If he wants to have a pissing match, be petty, vulgar, profane, and abusive to a fellow Fauna member we can do it in this thread about that very thing.
 
And I think this all started when I said:

you "Robert" will never have one ounce of the respect Chuck has earned in this hobby by acting like a troll.

Do you think people respect trolls like you? Well do ya? I think not!!
Click to expand...

I am sorry Sam, but you and Dan are not this whole hobby... :rolleyes:
 
RJK890 said:
Actually I think the 12 year old was rather something else. A child.
I am not a cry baby. I told Chuck I did not want to have an ongoing pissing match with him, but he decided to keep harassing me. I could engage in this with him in every thread on the BOI that he attacks me in, and bump those threads up but thought it would be better to take it up in a single relevant thread. Maybe a little childish but if he wants to act like a monkeys :censored: and attack me I am not going to put him on ignore. BTW, kinda funny he's not here bumping this one up.
Click to expand...

Oh he is coming don't you worry.... When he does are you going to find a post he made back in 2000 to bring up next?
 
RJK890 said:
I think this thread should be read by anyone considering dealing with Chuck Kimmel. He is very "Critical" of other people on the BOI and has been shown to be petty, abusive, and antagonistic to his own customers, and towards other members of this site. I would think twice before sending him my money.

Chuck,
I can't believe you even post on the BOI trying to expose scumbags. Just a little hypo"critical."

Everytime I post on a thread you post imediatly attacking me or telling me to "STFU." Why don't you leave me alone, and find yourself a new project for 08'. Your problem with me originated in the Ed Clark thread. I was not defending him but you took offense to my post and have been harassing me ever since. It seems you would welcome someone posting in defense of a seller with bad customer service, since you obviously fit the bill.

Thanks for helping me get the right thread David Michael Blair. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...
You're a pathetic troll, and probably a poor excuse for human. Think I wouldn't say that to your face? Guess again bub.

I'm not here to defend Chuck. He can do that himself if he even feels the need. Your resurrecting an old threat like this for the sole purpose of creating drama is the essence of trolling. Do go back under your bridge.
 
varnyard said:
And I think this all started when I said:



I am sorry Sam, but you and Dan are not this whole hobby... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You are correct sir, and the point Dan was trying to make was that you are also not the voice of this whole hobby.
:rolleyes:
 
Yes Robert you "ARE" trolling, by bumping this tread as an attck over your opinion.
 
varnyard said:
Yes Robert you "ARE" trolling, by bumping this tread as an attck over your opinion.
Click to expand...

Attack, thread, :ack2:
 
Gecko_Den said:
You are correct sir, and the point Dan was trying to make was that you are also not the voice of this whole hobby.
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Can't you guys agree to just disagree. Kind of seems pointless..
 
Serafim said:
Can't you guys agree to just disagree. Kind of seems pointless..
Click to expand...

Well John, I agree that Bobby and I have differing opinions on Chuck. I also agree that he has as much right to his opinion as I have to mine. What I don't agree with is his attributing statements to me that were not what I said and were based on his interpretation and then regurgitated as fact.
:shrug01:
 
Gecko_Den said:
You are correct sir, and the point Dan was trying to make was that you are also not the voice of this whole hobby.
:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Please point me to where I said I was the voice for the "whole" hobby. I said Chuck is respected, did I say by all? No, never did, so please do me the give me the same respect of not putting words in my mouth. Chuck has been around a long time, if these two threads are all that you can base him on as a bad guy, then maybe it is time to wake up and see the real world and this hobby.

So you don't like some of his actions, so what? There are many in our hobby that I do not like the actions of, do I need to bump old threads based on that? I hope not, I would have my work cut out for sure. :ack2:
 
LMAO. Some people like me and some people don't. Some people I like and others I don't. I think its obvious where Robert and I stand in that sense.

To those who support me, thank you. To those who don't, :censored: you.

Its really that simple.
 
snake5007 said:
I think it was me who he called a punk.
Click to expand...
I think you're right. Either way, Barnum & Bailey would probably be impressed with this thread.
 
Originally Posted by Jim O:
You're a pathetic troll, and probably a poor excuse for human. Think I wouldn't say that to your face? Guess again bub.

I'm not here to defend Chuck. He can do that himself if he even feels the need. Your resurrecting an old threat like this for the sole purpose of creating drama is the essence of trolling. Do go back under your bridge.
Click to expand...

Jim,
Chuck feels the need to post a reply attacking me after each time I post. If he wants to attack me with all kind of vulgar, profane post's then I think it should be done in a thread about his tendency to be rude, crude, vulgar, and abusive not on every BOI thread I post in. If that is trolling, "Get off my Bridge!"

I am sorry that you feel the way about me that you do and feel qualified to make that kind of character evaluation of me based on this issue. I have always respected your opinion an enjoyed your post's. I have no lack or need of drama and have told Chuck I did not want to engage in a pissing match with him. If he insists I feel this is the place for it. As far as saying that to my face, I'm sure you would. I am a pass-a-fist anyway, that's a poor attempt at humor, not a threat.
 
RJK890 said:
Jim,
Chuck feels the need to post a reply attacking me after each time I post. If he wants to attack me with all kind of vulgar, profane post's then I think it should be done in a thread about his tendency to be rude, crude, vulgar, and abusive not on every BOI thread I post in. If that is trolling, "Get off my Bridge!"

I am sorry that you feel the way about me that you do and feel qualified to make that kind of character evaluation of me based on this issue. I have always respected your opinion an enjoyed your post's. I have no lack or need of drama and have told Chuck I did not want to engage in a pissing match with him. If he insists I feel this is the place for it. As far as saying that to my face, I'm sure you would. I am a pass-a-fist anyway, that's a poor attempt at humor, not a threat.
Click to expand...

This isn't your bridge. And remember, YOU started this.
 
Not good enough, you still have the actions of a troll.

However, if you wanted to tell Chuck you are sorry for your actions here of bumping this thread, and the other one. He might just let you off the hook, I am not saying he will, but he might,,,,,, :shrug01:

Then you could act like a real man and work this out in a PM with him.
 
varnyard said:
As for what he does being justified, well I am not his judge, and I do not agree with everything he does, but I will say this, if he has something to say to you, you will be the first one to hear it. Now that is something I will say that I do respect about Chuck.
Click to expand...

If something I have learned with time on this site is not to mix up crudeness with being a stand-up guy/gal. It's obvious there's no correlation whatsoever. It is OK to support our friends, that is if that support doesn't cloud our own judgment.

Thanks.
 
ANYWHO.. Pissing match aside..

as Chuck mentioned.. some like him.. some don't.. could he learn some people skills? ha ha yeah..

do I agree with all he does.. no..

but I don't agree on everything with anyone.. who does?

but I think the thread needs to get back on track..

Just my 2 cents.. *shrugs*
 
Miss Tuniwha said:
but I think the thread needs to get back on track..

Just my 2 cents.. *shrugs*
Click to expand...

I could not agree more, like where it was before Robert went and trolled it up.
 
Back
Top