• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Beware of Jeane Best & Wendy Childs

shrap said:
Another sad attempt to deflect attention away from Wendy and your attempts to cover for her. The vast majority of my posts on this thread has been directly taking Wendy to task for her lies and inconsistencies and taking you to task for your oh so transparent attempt to distort the facts of the matter.

No where have I been riding on Tim's bandwagon. Way to once again distort reality to suit your own hidden agenda.
Now Now, Sammy, we all know that someone like chamco, who has himself stated, I believe, that you are known by who you associate with, would not go out of his way these many many, ohsovery many, times , just to sidetrack the spotlight from a scumbag friend of his.

Don't we?
 
Why on Gods Green Earth would someone knock my karma points back,as it wasn't low enough to Begin with,lol..I'm done posting to this tread :ack2:

Greg VanZweden

Forever Trust in What You Are and Nothing Else Matters
 
dragonsdesyre said:
Whoa!!! Where's the Cliff notes version so I can get caught up?
Wendy is a scum sucking dirtbag con artist white supremacist whore with whom you should not do business, and Jeanne is affiliated with her.

Did I miss anything?
 
Jim O said:
Wendy is a scum sucking dirtbag con artist white supremacist whore with whom you should not do business, and Jeanne is affiliated with her.

Did I miss anything?
Yes. You did.

If you do not have the approval of chamco to post your thread, he will, throughout the entire life of your thread, repeat himself in that HE thinks it is not worthy.

Other than that, you about covered it.
 
Wilomn said:
Yes. You did.

If you do not have the approval of chamco to post your thread, he will, throughout the entire life of your thread, repeat himself in that HE thinks it is not worthy.

Other than that, you about covered it.
Yeah, even if it exposes someone that could come close to Chris/TSE when you compare ethics, morals, and a raunchy foul mouth. (note; I know as far as amount of $$$ damage Chris has done doesn't compare to what Wendy has done, I'm just comparing the overall character equility). As far as everyone else having a criminal record, it shouldn't and doesn't matter, unless it is relevant to how one CONTINUES to run their life and it affects "us". This thread and the subjects being a perfect case in point.
 
Sammy,

No where have I been riding on Tim's bandwagon. Way to once again distort reality to suit your own hidden agenda.

I agree that you have not been on Timmy's bandwagon (your word), though not a prerequisite for "Jim's of a feather" (my accusation but your original word creation, and I admit a humorous spin on words .... I like it !), but you and he sing the same tune often enough, which is the criteria. I have no hidden agenda, although it is amazing how events have unfolded. Of course, only I know that, and as it seems to be a broken record with you in most every thread, I am kind of used to the accusation. Of course, if getting under your skin was a "hidden agenda"? Hmmmmmmm .....

I certainly do not agree with all the choices made by Wendy, although do not see it as some of the more vocal here, and am absolutely sincere on that. I have read every post, and have a very good understanding of the law as well. I also have a bit of experience dealing with customers and shipping reptiles :rofl:, and was doing it before you were born Sammy. But as with so many here, to include that alternative reality you sometimes enjoy, you cannot accept that I find fault in both parties. :shrug01:

Since many here need recreation, I expect to be "raked over the coals" by "the respected members of the BOI" again, as I seem to aggravate a few of you at will. :raspberry

As for the "bad press" and "company I keep", well, I'll just have to bear that burden. :dancer01:

I do confess to having never been familiar with Bianca Trump before today. I understand she got a few marriage proposals overnight ! Not from me ..... ;)
 
I didn't read all of the posts so this may have already been said...

You have no reasonable resposibility to refund the money, but with common shipping problems both due to the shipping company as well as the buyer, I think the wisest action would have been to use a cold pack in the first place. It is unrealistic to assume that everything is going to go perfectly and a simple pack could have saved the suffering of those poor animals...

Just my .02...
 
Jim

Since you've been in contact with her:

I do confess to having never been familiar with Bianca Trump before today. I understand she got a few marriage proposals overnight !

That was probably a joke but I was wondering if she is done with Fauna? She hasn't connected in a few days(last time I checked)so is she conceding the scumbag moniker without a fight?
 
Chameleon Company said:
I agree that you have not been on Timmy's bandwagon (your word), though not a prerequisite for "Jim's of a feather" (my accusation but your original word creation, and I admit a humorous spin on words .... I like it !), but you and he sing the same tune often enough, which is the criteria. I have no hidden agenda, although it is amazing how events have unfolded. Of course, only I know that, and as it seems to be a broken record with you in most every thread, I am kind of used to the accusation. Of course, if getting under your skin was a "hidden agenda"? Hmmmmmmm .....

I certainly do not agree with all the choices made by Wendy, although do not see it as some of the more vocal here, and am absolutely sincere on that. I have read every post, and have a very good understanding of the law as well. I also have a bit of experience dealing with customers and shipping reptiles :rofl:, and was doing it before you were born Sammy. But as with so many here, to include that alternative reality you sometimes enjoy, you cannot accept that I find fault in both parties. :shrug01:

Since many here need recreation, I expect to be "raked over the coals" by "the respected members of the BOI" again, as I seem to aggravate a few of you at will. :raspberry

As for the "bad press" and "company I keep", well, I'll just have to bear that burden. :dancer01:

I do confess to having never been familiar with Bianca Trump before today. I understand she got a few marriage proposals overnight ! Not from me ..... ;)
So then, if you know she got these proposals then you must have been in contact with her since last night.

Since you were in contact with her since last night and not here, one would not be wrong to assume you are "coaching/leading/advising/admonishing/whatthehellever". Correct?

WHY BOTHER?

No, don't answer, I don't want to know. The simple fact that you continue to stand by her side is ample edification for today.

Ample.
 
Chameleon Company said:
"Jim's of a feather" (..... and I admit a humorous spin on words .... I like it !),

Thank you.... I was chuckling myself when it popped in my head.

Chameleon Company said:
but you and he sing the same tune often enough, which is the criteria.

What tune is that Jim? You always love to drop these types of accusations without ever backing it up with any kind proof or reference. Hmmmmm.... Why is that Jim?

Chameleon Company said:
I have no hidden agenda, although it is amazing how events have unfolded. Of course, only I know that, and as it seems to be a broken record with you in most every thread, I am kind of used to the accusation.

Again, more of those fact less and proof less accusations. Really Jim, I am the one getting used to your broken record of accusations.

Chameleon Company said:
Of course, if getting under your skin was a "hidden agenda"? Hmmmmmmm .....

You quit getting under my skin long ago Jim. When I finally realized that the words you spew have little to zero credibility or fact in them. It is mostly folly in my book.


Chameleon Company said:
I certainly do not agree with all the choices made by Wendy, although do not see it as some of the more vocal here, and am absolutely sincere on that. I have read every post, and have a very good understanding of the law as well. I also have a bit of experience dealing with customers and shipping reptiles :rofl:, and was doing it before you were born Sammy. But as with so many here, to include that alternative reality you sometimes enjoy, you cannot accept that I find fault in both parties.

How long you have in biz Jim is really irrelevant to anything going on hear. You keep harping that fact like it is supposed to put you on some kind of all wise pedestal and the rest of us who have not been doing it as long are somehow beneath you. Sorry it just means you have been in biz for a while and that you are a bit full of yourself, nothing more.

No Jim, I can fully accept that you see things different. You seem to be the one struggling with that issue. What I cant accept is the fact that you were not here as an unbiased person looking for the truth. You were here trying to obscure the truth, deflect attention away from the facts and cover for your friend from the very beginning. That is what I can not accept.
 
John C., a voice of reason ! Let me ask you, as I do not expect many new to the thread to read it all, but if a seller has a satisfaction guarantee, and the customer feels that some of the animals are undersized upon receipt, besides the breakdown in communications that occurred, does the seller have an obligation to try to work something out with the customer?

Kevin, many here have been in touch with her of late, and I have spoken with her once today. To not post here is only to concede that it is not worth the time. Imagine that !

Yes, Wes, one of those ...... or as I said, maybe I answered my phone .... :rofl: If you called, I would answer as well. BTW, were you ever known by the name "Wesley Wad"? "Long Dong Wes"? Just a little humor ..... it was an eye opening morning for many of us. I don't think that my wife minded the every 2-3 month or so call from Wendy before, but now, from Bianca ..... could be trouble :reddevil:

P.S. Did she say "no" to you too ? :bawling:
 
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 36 (31 members and 5 guests)
Powderfinger, Tortoiselov, sfaoldguy, critical bill, monkeywrench133, TimmyD928, gecko5, eddie1976, LordOfTheLizards, ms_ramie22, Otter_23, Fedawg, kmurphy, Chameleon Company, Wilomn, shrap, Neverland Dragons, dot_s, Aienia, egyptiandan, ravensgait, J.Henderson, Wraith, bsharrah, jpatino, EriksReptiles, Bruce Lowder, rhacos.com, Heather D., Lizard Lair

Holy Smokes....now I can see why the "Jerry Springer Show" stays on the air...

If we had a few trailer park chicks showing their boobs in exchange for beads, this would be a dead ringer...

Sammy...I can't believe you allowed yourself to be dragged into this mess...LMAO!!!
 
Chameleon Company said:
Yes, Wes, one of those ...... or as I said, maybe I answered my phone .... :rofl: If you called, I would answer as well. BTW, were you ever known by the name "Wesley Wad"? "Long Dong Wes"? Just a little humor ..... it was an eye opening morning for many of us. I don't think that my wife minded the every 2-3 month or so call from Wendy before, but now, from Bianca ..... could be trouble :reddevil:

P.S. Did she say "no" to you too ? :bawling:

Uh oh......

Clear the dance floor fellas. I've a feeling this party is about to turn ugly. :bolt01:
 
Chameleon Company said:
John C., a voice of reason ! Let me ask you, as I do not expect many new to the thread to read it all, but if a seller has a satisfaction guarantee, and the customer feels that some of the animals are undersized upon receipt, besides the breakdown in communications that occurred, does the seller have an obligation to try to work something out with the customer?


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Yeah that is certainly one way of looking at the history of events, Jim. I guess you found the rest of the events in regards to this transaction irrelevant? Sad.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I guess I need to stop asking Wendy this question and pose it to you....

Where does it end, Jim, where does it end??????
 
John, read post 436 and several of those that follow to see why this thread turned toward its current course.

Jim:
To not post here is only to concede that it is not worth the time.

You've got me there? You have spent off and on all day on this thread. It is evidently worth your time and you're not even the topic of this thread, well when it's on topic that is. I have a problem with someone coping out by saying it's not worth my time. That's scammer talk. While all the superfluous stuff was interesting it had little to do with the topic. Wendy hasn't answered any of the questions that were asked to her directly, in reference to the first posts.
 
Sammy,

I have work to get to .... it happens ..... but with regard to this:
No Jim, I can fully accept that you see things different. You seem to be the one struggling with that issue. What I cant accept is the fact that you were not here as an unbiased person looking for the truth. You were here trying to obscure the truth, deflect attention away from the facts and cover for your friend from the very beginning. That is what I can not accept.

Such a grasp of the facts. I keep forgetting. Your view is the truth and unbiased. Mine is biased and something less. Let me see .... Sammy factual ..... Jim something less ...... Sammy factual .... Jim ..... Hmmmmmm.

I do admit that I have been a bit surprised in my talks with Wendy in the last few months. When I have been critical of her, which has been often enough, she hasn't blown me off (no pun intended). God forbid I obscure the truth here Sammy, or hijack a thread (I think the porn links did that pretty well ... thanks Tim). My wall of obscuring posts ..... lets see ......Timmy #1 ..... Wes #2 ..... Sammy #3 .... then me, I think (maybe we're in a tie), obscuring the truth! Damn I'm good !
 
critical bill said:
Uh oh......

Clear the dance floor fellas. I've a feeling this party is about to turn ugly. :bolt01:
Just because a bought and paid for whore turns down chamco, does not in any way obligate me to debase myself as he has by propsitioning her to begin with.

Consider the source before you get your knickers knotted.

A comment from chamco ain't worth the bother.
 
Back
Top