snakechaarmer
}:{ snakechaarmer }:{
My apology, I thought you were referring to me (this thread is moving fast!).
The way I see it is that when investing in an animal for breeding purposes (taking the Het issue out if it) there is no guarantee that it will:
1.) be fertile
2.) be a good producer
3.) survive to become of breeding age
When breeding Het to Het there is no guarantee that:
1.) you will produce a visual in the first, second, even third breeding
2.) when you do finally produce a visual that you will ever make your money back on the initial investment of the Het pair.
That's what I meant by referring to a gamble.
Kelli, thank you for putting it in such SIMPLE terms that everyone should be able to understand. It's very true and very accurate.
Derek - if you're still hung up on some statement about the lottery, again, that was Kelly's analogy, not mine, I simply agreed with her. And, as she just explained how breeding is a gamble in a way similar to the way the lottery is a gamble, I don't think you need any other explanation, nor why either of us should have to explain it to begin with.
And again, I repeat, agreeing with everyone else - this thread is about lack of communication and follow through and poor customer service communications. Not about proving or disproving hets. HOWEVER, if this snake did come with genetic paperwork and in 2-3 years does indeed NOT prove out after being bred to a visual female, then of course the OP should get some kind of compensation. But NOT to the extremes he demanded.
Period, the end, I'm done with this thread and giving it more publicity than it needs. Don't we all have animals to be caring for, anyway?
