• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bill Cagle Reptiles

Just for the record, nowhere in the rules for posting messages in the BOI does it say anything at all about a thread having to continue in the direction led by the first message in the thread.  In other words, a GOOD GUY message starting off a topic thread does not mean that the entire thread has to remain that way.  Nor is a topic's initial beginning message stating a person is a BAD GUY, keep the entire thread off limits for anyone whom disagrees.

Each topic thread should be limited to one SUBJECT (defined as a person or business), but once started it is now a discussion area for the subject of the thread.  The purpose of having it this way is for the bulk of the evidence presented by multiple people to be the deciding factor on how someone reading the thread will judge the merits of the ENTIRE discussion about the subject.  This was also intended to try to keep ALL information about a subject in one place on this forum.

I hope I have clarified this (it is LATE, so my keyboard skills may be suffering right now).  If anyone has any questions about this, please contact me offline and I'll try to do better in an email to you.
 
Jackie...yes, that WAS meant for you (in a joking way)....sorry for thinking you were female....my bad! You DO have rather "thin skin", though, huh?....
You've got to TRY and lighten up?? NOBODY is trying to attack YOU?? You just seem to take things the wrong way all the time??
As I thought about it for awhile, I was all set to MAYBE agree with you and stop trying to tell people how the site works....UNTIL our Lord and Master chimed in with the fact that I'm not doing ANYTHING wrong!! All I'm really trying to do, in any case, is get folks to follow the rules???
Sorry if I offended you (little brother)!! ....Neil
 
Webslave please dont delete any of this, why are you gonna help these guys out after they have made themselves to look like immature fools?? you leave everyhting Bill placed here because you say he is buring his own foot well all these post kind of looks like these guys have been doing the same to them selves, so why the protection for them?? Just Curious?


you guys trip me out, LMAO, boy the maturity levels proffesionalism have been flying high in here

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">
Jason - the messages I am considering deleting are the ones that are about the discussions concerning people's favorite sports teams, etc, that certainly no one could defend as being relevant to the subject matter of this thread, much less having any earthly relationship to this entire site.

Bill's comments, however, were BY the subject and certainly are relevant to the discussion based on the content as well as the tone of the messages.  If Bill were to post a message saying that a certain sports team is composed of a bunch of fools, then you would be correct in your assessment.  I fail to see how anyone could not reasonably recognize the difference.

WebSlave
</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
 
Like typing out Pantara lyrics is doing anyone any good!!!  What's that about??? Maybe you should try some of the red print in the Bible!!!!
 
First off I dont get your point, second Chris Red stop emailing me, I didnt respnd to you the 2nd or 3rd of 4th or 5th etc. etc. etc. time you emailed me so get the point and STOP!!!!
 
jason you fell in the same grey area you are calling pplfools over IE the foorball and as chris said pantera only difference i saw was it iwas at the end of a flame not on its own now as to why Bills post were not removed .. well thats a NO BRAINER
the people that were making out the footballs plugs were just that PLUGS  Billon the other hand was showing people something valuable ... his attitude towrds simple question & answer routines and how he deals with them by spurting out with resentment for the fact he was called out at his own doing ... now i will say yes to some and maybe alot i was a " instigator " of this thread by asking a simple question when this started , BUT i wanted a simple anser that was all , and then you Jason stpped up to bat facing the wrong way and and tried to protect Bill buy spouting out falses .. only small difference was  you saw your mistake and apologized for it ( didnt mean  alot as you seem to still back up what the master wants ... ) but none the less Bill exposed hiself in the ,manner i think he would take on any defensive measure when asked  a question regarding his care and procedures buy anyone not dedicated to spending hard earned$$$ So before you genralize peoples posts make sure you are not part of that assumption ...
 
Well   Jason I was wondering what Pantara had to do with snakes and the BOI. I did email you twice....but you did respond Jason !!! So what's up with the lies??? Sorry thought I might turn you on to something cool...those lyrics were from 1990!!!
Just wanted you to catch up with times!!! Maybe your record collection stops in 1990......
 
Sorry Jason...That's right I did email you a few times when you were posting things you had no idea what you were talking about.....sorry I forgot that was you!!!  I guess real facts are not important to you....once again I was just trying to get the facts straight....it seems you make up your own!!!
 
no chris you sent me two emails concering this on going saga, first of which I replied to in the forum, the second email you sent me I ingnored from there after and they have continued up till a week ago the remainder have gone something like this

"
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:54:38 -0400

To: [email protected]

From: [email protected] | Block Address  | Add to Address Book

Subject: Chris Red

       
Email Generated by IkonboardClassic Dums,

This email has been sent from Chris Red via Ikonboard.

(http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard/ikonboard.cgi)

-------------------------------------------------

Hey I read a post a while back were you were reading some Pantara
music......check out this site www.superjointritual.com
Its Phils new band he left Pantara, my best friend is the
drummer....it also Jimmy from Crowbar and Eyehategod and C.O.C. also Mike Hagga
plays bass on the recordDead Horse
also Hank Williams the III is going to be in the band.....anyway
thought ever Metal Head should know...oh yea one more thing Bill Cagle still
sucks!!! My snakes all seem to be fine after all this mess...what a
stress ball!!!
Chris Henrich"

so everyone else can read this "My snakes all seem to be fine after all this mess" Chris I am not trying to be rude but it just apears to me as though your looking for freinds, as far as my cd collection thats none of your buisness, I follow the bands I chose to follow, had I been interested in these I would have replied to your 2nd, 3rd, 4th etc. etc. emails, like I said I dont mean to be rude but I am not interested, thanks anyway, A, for effort
which is your real name Chris Red or Chris Henrich and if its Henrich why are his posts allowed to stand with false information?

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">

I am looking into this issue about Chris Red's real name now.  If he does not post his full REAL name in his messages, then I will be deleting ALL of them he has posted.

WebSlave

</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
 
uhhmmm isnt this off topic Jason .... so would you fall into the same boay you accused of ?
 
jason..please give it a rest with the chris red issue.
he seems to mean you no harm and honestly its not interesting or part of what is going on with this thread.
please oh please just push delete if that what it takes and dont keep advising us about your mail situation. or the lyrics to rock songs..
thanks and dont get mad now..maybe we just need to find some new material..thats all.
 
Yes Jason your right I'm looking for cyber friends you caught me....it was just a plug for a friends band....well I think they are my friend I better go email them and find out!!!!  Anyway keep posting lyrics, were them on your shirt whatever makes you feel tuff !!!!!
 
Alan take my apoligy for what you will, that has nothing to do with the issue we are discussing, i tried to move the nonsense in this thread to the discussion forum where it belongs, however it contiued here, i never sad i wasnt part of the football talk, however if i spoke of football or anything else besides the issue at hand it was only after i had adressed an issue in response to someone elses post, then yes I did follow it up with some football talk, but the football talk had nothing to do with my post

anyway that wasnt what i was talking about, the weslave has decided to be more specific, "I know some levity is needed and we can't always remain serious, but there's got to be a point somewhere when we have to call it quits."or make me decide how far up to slice and dice" my bad for assuming I figured from the statments above he was talking about all the song and winners dances as well, however i feel it all should stay as is, what i was talking about was all the riddle ,song and "winners" dances that few people did, no need for it, thats what i was refering to as immature and foolish,


"before you genralize peoples posts make sure you are not part of that assumption" yes i was part of the football comments but in no way part of the, cagle tv, roses are red riddles or any of that, that stuff is plain wrong, and as I explained above I feel it all should stay and I was not reffering to the football comments to those I said look foolish, sorry for not being more specific


quoted from the webslave "there are some people that won't appreciate the humor here and it will reflect on the entire BOI." thats exactly why it should stay to show an unbiased true account of the on goings in this forum, let the people make there desicions themsleves about the forum and its people and not try to butter it with the delete button



Kim and Alan all I did was adress Chris he brought up pantera and all that NOT me, so go jump on him, am I not entitled to respond to a post directed at me???

webslave my bad Chris does have his name in there, when you are replying and it puts all the post below the box you are typing in it doesnt show the signatures, sorry about that thanks for checking
 
OK JASON
chris please stop talking about rocks songs.
etc etc etc.
<img src="http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt='???'>

does that work now?
 
Neil, Since you brought it up I don't think that the webmasters thread has anything to do with what I'm talking about. If it was meant for me then I think he has misunderstood what I am talking about( no offense webmaster). I never said if a post is a good guy post then they all must be that way or vice versa. What I am trying to relay is that it is against the rules to stray from the topic and talk about football, personal insults, babbling about monks and Nostradamus and so on. Go back a page or two and look at the webmasters other post. It states that we all need to get back on track(including me). I have never said I don't break the rules by doing this on occasion, what I said is that I don't break the rules and then point out other peoples mistakes like you do. But you can't or shouldn't pick and choose what rules you feel are important to follow and then chastise others who break the rules. Evidently it really bothers you about people not posting their names and you try to right the wrongs by posting sometimes not to subtle remarks about full names and reading the rules. I, on the other hand hate to start reading a thread that was meant to be informational and start stumbling over posts that are so completely irrelevant to the topic that it is ridiculous. I guess we both feel strongly about what is important and what isn't so lets do the board a favor and just leave it alone. By the way did you speak with the webmaster to see if that thread was intended for me? Or was that your opinion on the matter.
Your little brother
Jackie Lapradd
 
First off Craig, I would like to apologize for any perceived disrespect I may have caused. I myself tried to take this to another thread. Obviously unsuccessfully. My intent was not to disrespect. However, this is NOT YOUR topic. You may have started it, though that does not make it yours. This BOI is an open forum for ANYONE to post their thoughts. Given they abide by the Webslave's wishes. Although we all know that some of us, myself included, need a reminder from time to time. It is not wise to assume people will not post their feelings in regards to a topic, regardless of the subject or the poster. Why do you deserve exhalted status? Where did you get the idea that our intent was to disrespect you? Your name was hardly even mentioned. Instead of playing poor picked on me, you should be thankful that enough people care enough to attempt to look out for you. The way I look at it, you knew the purpose of the BOI. You posted of your own free will. You had your say, we had ours. I must say, I do not appreciate your "holier than thou" attitude. You are no better than any of us. In closing, this post is not a personal attack on you. These are MY feelings. I welcome your response. You may choose to take my words how you will. I am not attempting to berate you. However, if you perceive offense or disrespect from this, that is your problem and an issue you will have to deal with. I hope you have a nice day Craig.  <img src="http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'>
 
Craig, I was also one of the original posters on this thread. I also mean no disrespect to you personally. However, if you did read this whole thread from beggining to end, you can only come to one conclusion. Jason and Bill started this whole flame war from the beggining. Jason, by attacking someone for asking a legitimate question and accusing them of "spreading gossip and half truths" and Bill for being.......well, Bill! You will also notice in the second page of this thread that a number of people apologized for taking this thread off topic. All would have been fine, but Bill Cagle came here and started calling people names etc. and it went down hill from there. So, if you have a beef with anyone, blame Jason or Bill. We are only responding to there comments.

Good luck with your snakes,
Dennis Gulla
 
well apparently guys you missed the part where he says he doesnt blame bill for snapping..so let us all use that excuse and we wont be blamed either..
craig- we snapped. henceforth we are not to blame either.
the insanity approach works for me. how bout you others??
 
Well Kim.... I hate to, but I have to disagree with you on this one. Not blaming Bill for snapping is a cop-out in a thinly veiled attempt to excuse Bill from accepting responsibilty for his unprofessional and as*inine behavior. IMO, Craig is coming down on us for our remarks, yet all the while condoning Bill's actions. Furthermore, IMO that is blatant double-standardism bordering on hypocrisy. I will take my lumps for my remarks. I also will not pass the buck. I'm not going to come on here and act foolishly in retaliation for comments that are not so favorable to me. I respect everyone's feelings. If they feel strongly enough to post, so be it. They are entitled. Just because they disagree with me, does not mean I'm going to blow up and attack them. I love debates/arguments. I welcome all feedback good or bad. I can dish it, and I CAN TAKE IT. Have a nice day y'all!!!    <img src="http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'>
 
Back
Top