Why not post the police report? It would prove at least some of your story. At least give Jim the information he needs to verify your contention that the animal was stolen by UPS. Why would you tell anyone that this happened if you were not willing to prove it?
Let's have a show of hands on this one: how many people have given an explanation of their innocence which involves a vet report, a police report, a receipt, a tracking number, etc. etc. etc.? How many of those have refused to post that proof? How many of THOSE have refused to post the proof because they claim that suddenly it doesn't matter what anyone thinks and it will be just torn apart?
Now, how many of those in the last category turned out to be vindicated of the original wrongdoing? I can think of none.
Again, Bill is practicing doublespeak.
I admitted taking the snake and paid for it and returned the money Lee borrowed, In the real world that is Called Restitution
I did send the E-mail But as time moved on I decided, The Hell with it you people never wanted the true you wanted something to chew on so.You have what you have
So he admits he stole the animal, then goes right back to his story that he has proof that the ORIGINAL thief (because he still stole the animal, whether or not the FedEx driver stole it first) story is true, but no one here deserves to see it.
I wonder if he's seen fit to share the proof of FedEX-gate with Wendy, or Lucille, or some of the others that have had their faith in friendship shaken over this entire incident. Anybody want to give me odds on that happening?
You still don't get it, Bill. Your attitude of "he's got his money, so I'm vindicated" is so incredibly insufficient in its scope of comprehension it astounds me. I guess I shouldn't be surprised that someone who can give up his ethics for $200 doesn't see that. Your morals didn't just have a price, Bill, they were on the bargain basement table with a big blue light flashing above them.