-
In case most of you have not noticed, I made changes to the donation amounts as well as the durations for all of the paid membership levels. Things are winding down here, and this seems to be the most prudent way to deal with the "end of life" period of this site.
Contributor level members - $10 per 30 days
Sponsors - Eliminated
Benefactor level members - $25 per 30 days
Endowment level members - $50 per 30 days
Account Upgrades Page -
Responding to email notices you receive.
**************************************************
In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.
BOA KHAL ANERY 100% het albino het for moonglow
- Thread starter Snakemorphology
- Start date
MorphedoutBreeders
New member
Male or female?
An anery het albino can't be het for moonglow without also being a hypo. And those pictures are of a motley. The pairing described could not have produced that animal.
Rarebreed
Member
Male or female and was one parent motley?
Even if one parent was motley, the animal pictured cannot be "het moonglow" because it is not a hypo. Maybe this genetic mystery can be resolved with parent pics.
rickm
New member
And the fact that these are three different animals......something smells fishy.......
Snakemorphology
New member
motley Dobble het for moonglow
female was a moonglow male was a motley het albino hypo
this is a female i also have males
female was a moonglow male was a motley het albino hypo
this is a female i also have males
rickm
New member
Which pic is the animal for sale....these three pics are of three different animals?
A moonglow x hypo motley het albino pairing couldn’t have produced an anery. Do you have a third explanation? I call bogus.
I hadn’t even noticed that the pictures are of three different animals, but with a closer look, I am sure of it. Just look at the tails. There is more than one form of misrepresentation at work here.