Bad Guy Bob Sloan is back

[deborahbroadus]

angelrose has his/her profile set to private.
This user must add you as a friend in order to view his/her profile.

It wasn't private when I went there, but then I don't know if I added her or not, I have this habit of just accepting friends so that no one feels rejected.

 

[deborahbroadus]

Scamming poor lonely Bob Sloan out of some snakes.... OH THE IRONY!!!!

Deb, you can go after this girl all you want. Her story is obviously not completely on the up and up. But dont you ever try to paint Bob Sloan as anything other than the total scumbag he is. Got it? I sure hope so.

I gotcha Sammy,

I just want some writing on here to show that she's not completely innocent, or something showing that she is...one way or another and not just another lying scammer.

The next snakes she scams (if she's not on the up and up) may not be Sloans.

Personally, I have no problem with scammers scamming scammers..the problem is that they don't usually limit their actions to their own little circle.

 

[homegrownherps]

I gotcha Sammy,

I just want some writing on here to show that she's not completely innocent, or something showing that she is...one way or another and not just another lying scammer.

The next snakes she scams (if she's not on the up and up) may not be Sloans.

Personally, I have no problem with scammers scamming scammers..the problem is that they don't usually limit their actions to their own little circle.

She may or may not be on the up and up.
But Sloan is the lowest, and if he got scammed he deserves it.

What comes around - goes around....Sloan's day is coming

 

[shrap]

I gotcha Sammy,

I just re-read my post to you when you quoted it and I apologize if it came across sounding harsh. It wasnt my intention to be so I hope you didnt interpret it as such. But I can certainly see how one could after re-reading it. So again, my apologies. I was still laughing too hard thinking about poor "lonely Bob".

 

[GottaLuvHerps]

Her profile is private unless you are a friend. Apparently, I am one, as well as 2015 other people.

I contacted Lisa/Marissa and told her that she should call the police in the Hamburg area just to make sure they are aware of possible issues. Although I believe that Sloan is a lowlife degenerate from the reading I have done on him in the past here on the BOI, it does seem that something is not right here with this girl either. I did read the tegu forum thread, and it was obviously messed with, as in the posts that Sloan left, someone had X'd out names of her daughters in some, and even her name in some, but not all. I am not saying that she changed the posts, some or all, but someone obviously did, as Sloan seemed to have no problem putting her information out there for the world to see. IMO, she also antagonized him by answering his posts and asking him questions as well. This does not in any way make what he did or said right, but it makes me wonder what was really said and what was not.
Relationship with a pyscho or not, I personally think this girl is somewhat of an attention whore.
Notice the background and the main picture in the attached screenshot of her RG profile. Also, notice that she is now from DC and not PA...something is amiss IMO.
Kelly Kordek

 

[GottaLuvHerps]

Notice the background and the main picture in the attached screenshot of her RG profile. Also, notice that she is now from DC and not PA...something is amiss IMO.
Kelly Kordek

Helps if I add the picture...sorry gang.

 

[deborahbroadus]

She may or may not be on the up and up.
But Sloan is the lowest, and if he got scammed he deserves it.

What comes around - goes around....Sloan's day is coming

Now, y'all have fun bashing that Sloan fool. I am sure he deserves everything he's getting. A few more discriminating readers may be wiser.

People reading the thread may or may not realize that she has provided no substance for her claims. They may be a bit wiser for reading the few posts of people asking questions that went unanswered and hopefully will not send her any snakes without getting their money first!

Sloan ALREADY has boo koos of posts about him..a few more words aren't going to do any more damage than is already done.

Ok, well...I've done my good deed for the day (this should count for a couple of weeks).

 

[LauraB]

Yes, I do believe the scammer got scammed.

She also has a 2nd Fauna account, user Liza07. Gee, I guess she forgot that one when she emailed Rich about changing her name. The email address she uses for her Fauna Liza07 account and her theTegu account are also the same ... [email protected]. Just put that email addy in a Yahoo/Google search.

"1angelrose" also has a photobucket account. For adults only ... and now I have to go bleach my retinas.
Kelly is correct ... this chick is an attention whore.


LOL Bob ... karma's a bear!! And you are one very creepy guy.

 

[deborahbroadus]

Helps if I add the picture...sorry gang.

THANK you! I have been wrestling with that most of the morning trying to do what you did. Apparently, I am a friend too.

Sammy, no harm done. I took it to mean that you hope I wasn't dense enough to think that the Sloan persona was nice even if she did scam him, and not to even try to make him appear nice in my posts.

 

[LakesideBoas]

So you had a relationship with him before you knew he was a little off his rocker? (It's okay, Hun, crazy people don't wear signs so don't feel bad about it) And now you're paying for ending it?

I never met this person. certainly, nothing physical or emotional for that matter involved here. emails.

let it be known all this is happening because he is obsessed over a pair of patternless bullsnakes. he has been pressuring me to get for him through

homegrownherps

and I would not and will not.

If you are correct Deb, and I don't doubt that you are, she, at the very least, lied.

Marrissa, what ever your name is, my post was a golden opportunity for you to come clean. In fact, if you had done that then, most folks would have had a modicum of sympathy for you. I would not expect that now.

Hey, Deb, I think you borrowed my hat! You're usually the nice one and I'm usually more persistent! Must have got mixed up at the cleaners!

Looks good on you!

An aside:
Just because it was Bob Sloan that got "took" on this one I wouldn't go feeling all warm and fuzzy. It very easily could have been one of us. People do things for friends and perceived loves they would never do for any other. Coming here as the "damsel in distress" very nearly worked. Hey, I fell for it.

Along with Fauna's rep for being thorough (okay scammers have other words for us) we also have a reputation here for helping our own. I'm wondering if perhaps that was taken into consideration before the initial post.

 

[GottaLuvHerps]

"1angelrose" also has a photobucket account. For adults only ... and now I have to go bleach my retinas.
Kelly is correct ... this chick is an attention whore.

Ok...besides the pictures of Sloan that were creepy as hell, she also had several that photobucket deleted for violation of their policies. Nearly every picture that was not of her animals had something sexual about it, even those weird glitter graphics that I find really obnoxious, and she even has one of her BP crawling down her naked chest (sorry guys, just cleavage shots lol). I don't know about most of you other girls, but unless you are trying to get some serious attention, you don't put yourself out there on the web like that. IMO of course.

Am I sad that Sloan apparently got taken? Of course not, like Maggie said, karma is a real pain sometimes. But I am pissed that some chick comes on here making herself out to be this innocent little girl and makes the rest of us women who are really into herps look bad. It's hard enough for us (as women) to gain some semblance of respect without having to shove a snake down our cleavage, geesh!

Deb, all I did was a screen shot and put it in Paint, uploaded it to photobucket and posted the image link. Just FYI. OH, and give Maggie her hat back, its freaking me out seeing her so nice! LOL

 

[Wolfy-hound]

I don't see it as she "scammed" him out of ANYTHING.
If I have a friend(which we'll assume she was chatting him up beforehand), and I mention "Hey, I'd love a blackhead python, I just cna't afford one".. and they ship me one as a gift.. is it me scamming them if they LATER ON say "I got it for you even though you didn't ask me to, but it cost $1500 so you owe me $1500 now, because I'm mad"
Scuse me? If you say "Wow that vintage corvette is so hot" and someone turns around and gives one to you along with a bill for $50K, is that right? You didn't BUY it, you mentioned you LIKE them. Big difference.
The email she DID post from him CLEARLY stated she did NOT ask him to procure snakes for her. Once he got mad at her(for either not buying him snakes on the sly, or not putting out, or breaking off the relationship or whatever), THEN he suddenly wants paid for snakes he admits IN HIS EMAIL he was not asked to procure for her.
Yes.. she probably chatted him up. Yes, she probably liked all the attention, but once she finds out he wants what she doesn't want to give, it's within her rights to say "No, sorry" WITHOUT being threatened, having her children threatened, and being suddenly given a bill for gifts.
The threats were in the theTegu thread, sorry you didn't read that Deb. It looks like most of it was deleted, but somewhere earlier on THIS thread, someone posted what looked like most of it.
He put some serious threats up on the net threatened her and her kids, becuase she won't pay for snakes that he GAVE her as gifts(by his own words).
How do you figure that she is as bad as him? Although it was stupid to engage in a spat online, basically egging him on, it doesn't make threats right, doesn't mean she owes money for gifts freely given.

 

[dprince]

How do you figure that she is as bad as him? Although it was stupid to engage in a spat online, basically egging him on, it doesn't make threats right, doesn't mean she owes money for gifts freely given.

It's clear that she's not being entirely forthright about some stuff (Lisa or Marissa? Where does she live? As another poster pointed out, Bob obviously had to send her snakes somewhere, so it's not like she's hiding from him......) MY point is - whatever the reasoning behind it - it tends to take a lot of credibility away from what she is saying, and it seems like she's got some important information to share. I haven't heard ANYONE say that Bob Sloan is a good guy in this, and I certainly appreciate this being brought to light, but her story just isn't adding up. I wouldn't personally say that "she's as bad as him", but without some gaping holes being filled in, it's not hard to see why some people are questioning her and wanting more information.

 

[LauraB]

Theresa ...

You are absolutely correct. Threats Bob made to her or her kids are in NO way justified nor excused nor to be taken lightly.

Perhaps "scammed" is not the proper word ... perhaps she merely "enticed" him for snakes she wanted. Perhaps she merely "entices" a lot of people for snakes/tegus/birds/etc she wants. Perhaps in her "enticement", she lead psycho Bob on ... that's her problem, not ours.
And yes, she needs to follow up with police reports on the threats.
Bob is a frickin nutcase, Bob is a frickin liar, Bob is a frickin scammer. When you get involved with scum, it'll come back to haunt you. She's an adult, she should know that. Nice example she's setting for the kids.

Unfortunately, she got herself into a little mess and now she's over her head. She didn't know who she was dealing with. Everyone already knows what Bob Sloan is. He sure as hell doesn't need encouragement from some other lying twit who steals sexy photos, posts them freely and pretends they are her!

If she got the snakes under false pretenses, then yes ... she "enticed".
She just ain't the Girl Scout she would want everyone to believe, that's all; still certainly not in the same "bad" league as Bob, but not quite the innocent victim of a scam herself.

 

[Wolfy-hound]

Absolutely Laura, I couldn't say it as good as you did. She got in over her head with someone that's a wacko. It's her own fault she got involved with him, and she's not answering questions, and she's got holes in the story, so she looks better and innocent.
It's still not at all the same to me as scamming someone, nor should she be considered as bad as he is, since I don't see her threatening his family, much less children.
If someone is nice to people on here, and builds relationships(of freindship and professional in nature) and then gets deals on animals they want.. is that going ot be scamming too? Or is that okay.. as long as they don't later on have a falling out, THEN it's scamming?

 

[jayefbe]

Ugh, I'm thoroughly grossed out, there's a picture on her photobucket account of her suggestively on all fours with a tegu on her back (thankfully she's clothed). Guess who's holding on to the tegu, making sure it doesn't fall off? That's right, it looks like it's her daughter.

I guess that must just be motherhood at it's best.

 

[Dennis Hultman]

Now, y'all have fun bashing that Sloan fool. I am sure he deserves everything he's getting. A few more discriminating readers may be wiser.

People reading the thread may or may not realize that she has provided no substance for her claims. They may be a bit wiser for reading the few posts of people asking questions that went unanswered and hopefully will not send her any snakes without getting their money first!

Sloan ALREADY has boo koos of posts about him..a few more words aren't going to do any more damage than is already done.

Ok, well...I've done my good deed for the day (this should count for a couple of weeks).

"What claims? Sloan stated in his own posts that he sent them free of charge with no payment as gifts but he wants them back now. She claims they were gifts as well. None claimed any different. They both agree.

She claims he is threatening her and her children. He is threatening her and has made no claims different. You can read the quotes about the children he posted. They were clearly threats. I was reading them while he was replying to thread on the other site. So who is claiming any different? The claims are valid.

All I am seeing is a story told by a female in which she says , this and that. I don't even know if she really does have children! I know nothing but what she's saying a the few emails she posted don't support that he's threatening her children.

These are his posts. They are clearly threats.

See you tomorrow sweetheart. Sleep tight and keep those girls inside.

I can do it myself tomorrow when they go to school. See you all at the bus stop Monday !

The only difference is she stated they weren't in a relationship and he states they are. But, he even states he never even seen her face. Now, she may have and probably did lie about the "relationship" which shoots her credibility.
But nobody is disputing the claims she made about receiving the snakes or the threats, not even Sloan.

You keep stating his snakes, plain and simple they are hers. He stated he gave them to her. She stated he gave them to her. Past documented experiences with the principle shows Nothing would change if she gave them back.

Deb, you keep asking why a man would send any gift to woman without prompting? It happens everyday. You are so preoccupied with the fact that she might have batted a computer eyelash at him, sent photos to him or how much cleavage she may have shown in a webcam, nothing else matters. She must be scamming. She could be as bad as him, I don't know.

How many people here chat? I'm not much of a chat person. In this friendly group we have here many chat with heavy sexual overtones or participate in threads that get a little dirty. Most of the time you know the people well enough that it's harmless fun. Maybe, she is someone that does the same and unknowingly hooked a nut.

You are more concerned, by your replies, that this woman may have gotten free snakes because she is a woman that may have flirted and that's how she received them and it pisses you off. That she may have led him on, No.. she must have because no man would do so without prompting. You keep stating
it as a must. I'll tell you flat out it doesn't take much prompting for some if they are interested.

Also, I want to go back to this earlier quote.

Originally Posted by deborahbroadus View Post
Why would he send her a nude picture out of the blue? Why isn't there a number of females that have made this same complaint? Most of the links I had read usually had a snake involved and stealing money. I haven't read any posts (except the one by Angel) that claim that he started sending women presents for nothing and then harassing them out of the blue and threatening them for nothing (but I could be wrong and often am).

I respect your decision to think that it's ok for her to keep his snakes. Mine is "When you poke a bear you can expect to get bit."

Why would he send pictures out of the blue? I'm not stating he did but I will help with the history. Sloan has registered on this site under many names. In his earlier profile he put up links to pedophile sites. Under almost every name he has used he has attacked someone with a barrage of sexual assault statements. Made statements that included raping peoples wifes to putting forth statements with racial slurs that were encompassed pornographic statements. That is the kind of person he is. Does it take a vivid imagination to believe he would sent a nude picture of himself without prompting? The answer is NO!

You took one of my earlier statements and restated as this?
"I respect your decision to think that it's ok for her to keep his snakes."
That isn't exactly what I stated and they aren't his snakes.

 

[Cat_72]

"What claims? Sloan stated in his own posts that he sent them free of charge with no payment as gifts but he wants them back now. She claims they were gifts as well. None claimed any different. They both agree.

She claims he is threatening her and her children. He is threatening her and has made no claims different. You can read the quotes about the children he posted. They were clearly threats. I was reading them while he was replying to thread on the other site. So who is claiming any different? The claims are valid.



These are his posts. They are clearly threats.




The only difference is she stated they weren't in a relationship and he states they are. But, he even states he never even seen her face. Now, she may have and probably did lie about the "relationship" which shoots her credibility.
But nobody is disputing the claims she made about receiving the snakes or the threats, not even Sloan.

You keep stating his snakes, plain and simple they are hers. He stated he gave them to her. She stated he gave them to her. Past documented experiences with the principle shows Nothing would change if she gave them back.

Deb, you keep asking why a man would send any gift to woman without prompting? It happens everyday. You are so preoccupied with the fact that she might have batted a computer eyelash at him, sent photos to him or how much cleavage she may have shown in a webcam, nothing else matters. She must be scamming. She could be as bad as him, I don't know.

How many people here chat? I'm not much of a chat person. In this friendly group we have here many chat with heavy sexual overtones or participate in threads that get a little dirty. Most of the time you know the people well enough that it's harmless fun. Maybe, she is someone that does the same and unknowingly hooked a nut.

You are more concerned, by your replies, that this woman may have gotten free snakes because she is a woman that may have flirted and that's how she received them and it pisses you off. That she may have lead him on, No.. she must have because no man would do so without prompting. You keep stating
it as a must. I'll tell you flat out it doesn't take much prompting for some if they are interested.

Also, I want to go back to this earlier quote.


Why would he send pictures out of the blue? I'm not stating he did but I will help with the history. Sloan has registered on this site under many names. In his earlier profile he put up links to pedophile sites. Under almost every name he has used he has attacked someone with a barrage of sexual assaults. Made statements that included raping peoples wifes to putting forth statements with racial slurs that were encompassed pornographic statements. That is the kind of person he is. Does it take a vivid imagination to believe he would sent a nude picture of himself without prompting? The answer is NO!

You took one of my earlier statements and restated as this?
"I respect your decision to think that it's ok for her to keep his snakes."
That isn't exactly what I stated and they aren't his snakes.

This is EXACTLY what I've tried to type several times and keep deleting because I couldn't get it to come out right....thank you, Dennis!!!!

 

[Cat_72]

I cant believe Ive just spent a half an hour reading this thing. What a waste of time...Send the snakes back and be done with it. If you keep them, then dont come on here crying and whining that this guy is a psycho; you seem to be as much of a moron as he is.

Im disgusted-

If you knew ANYTHING about Sloan, you would know that sending the snakes back would not solve anything. He would claim that they arrived dead, or that it was an empty box she sent.....or something. It would not end.

The snakes in reality have NOTHING to do with it, Sloan is a sick who does this kind of thing to get his jollies tormenting people.

 

[Double LY]

You are absolutely correct. Threats Bob made to her or her kids are in NO way justified nor excused nor to be taken lightly.

Perhaps "scammed" is not the proper word ... perhaps she merely "enticed" him for snakes she wanted. Perhaps she merely "entices" a lot of people for snakes/tegus/birds/etc she wants. Perhaps in her "enticement", she lead psycho Bob on ... that's her problem, not ours.
And yes, she needs to follow up with police reports on the threats.
Bob is a frickin nutcase, Bob is a frickin liar, Bob is a frickin scammer. When you get involved with scum, it'll come back to haunt you. She's an adult, she should know that. Nice example she's setting for the kids.

Unfortunately, she got herself into a little mess and now she's over her head. She didn't know who she was dealing with. Everyone already knows what Bob Sloan is. He sure as hell doesn't need encouragement from some other lying twit who steals sexy photos, posts them freely and pretends they are her!

If she got the snakes under false pretenses, then yes ... she "enticed".
She just ain't the Girl Scout she would want everyone to believe, that's all; still certainly not in the same "bad" league as Bob, but not quite the innocent victim of a scam herself.

Great post Laura

When I went to Sloan's myspace page that was linked early in this thread, I thought he looked to be "fishing". His profile says he set up his page for "networking" and that he's not interested in an online girlfriend because of all the "freaks" and that his heroes are single women raising children. If Sloan were a "normal" person, that profile wouldn't seem so strange to me. However, knowing what a psycho stalker Sloan is, it seems he is trying to entice lonely ladies by appearing to be a knight in shimmering armor. Hell, even his profile picture is from like 20 years ago and is not so scary - ANY of those webcam pics would have totally creeped me out (and I haven't even seen any of the nudie ones).

I believe the "Angel" may have read Sloan's profile backwards, if you will. Sloan appeared to be a pretty normal, but lonely, fella to her. An online relationship was obviously had (I am not willing to assume the extent of said relationship). She received a "gift" by either hinting around or flat out asking and Sloan decided he wanted something in return. Unfortunately for "Angel" she has now realized she bit off way more than she could chew.