RJK890
Lone Wolf
I was not speaking for "Mr. Clark."Do you always speak for mr. clark or is this something recent?
It was mr. clark, he who made the ambiguous statement, I asked for clarification, not his lackey, if such is now your position.
I've found that answering for others generally leaves the taste of foot in one's mouth. Is this true for you as well?
I was simply pointing out the fact that his reply of "Go for it" was not advocating violence as you suggested, and was clearly in response to Bells post suggesting that someone show up at Bobby's address with a Sheriff.
If you wanted clarification specifically from Ed you should have asked for it by PM. I simply contributed to the thread by clarifying something for a fellow member that seemed to be lacking some comprehension skills.
Of course, you didn't actually needed anything clarified and were just taking a petty off topic shot at Ed by closing with, "Perhaps one should use caution in this area when one has dis-satisfied customers. Don't you have one or two of those yourself, mr. clark?"
Do you have anything pertaining to this thread that you could post, or are you just here to deflect attention away from your friend Mr. Hill by attacking "Mr. Clark" and myself ?
