Well if you want to get really technical about it, size and maturity are related to the point in time at which a female should be able to breed. There will always be exceptions to the rules of thumb that we go by. But I think that most breeders would agree that even if you were to power feed and grow, let’s say for illustrative purposes, a female Colombian to a ridiculous 6 feet in her first year and like 10 to 12 lbs, she probably will not successfully breed in that first year, despite her size. That is what I meant by sexual maturity, you can't just go by the age of the animal.
I disagree. And if I read the rest of your post right, so do you. LOL
I guess what I'm saying is, a thin female of a mature age, will produce much better results than a female that is young, and at a size to make you
think she is of breeder age. They aren't the same. And it's because of people propensity to feed their snakes too much, there by getting them "up to size" that I say maturity is a better deciding factor then size. Size can be an illusive factor, where as a 5 yr old is a 5 yr old, regardless of size.
Personally, I wouldn't breed any of my Colombians less then 4 yrs old, AND 16 lbs. minimum, even if all the breeders in the world are doing it. Age, is more important then size. A 13 yr old girl can have babies successfully. Happens all the time. Should they? Not in my opinion.
Fact is, if a female is not mature, or in good enough health to have a litter, she most likely won't even develop follicles, let alone a litter of healthy babies. So, I do agree with you that both factors are important. Just that I think maturity is a more important factor then size.
You need to meet Pip.
