Chris Kobesko [email protected]= waste of your time

[ckobesko]

You still aren't getting it are you? The account used to make all the damning posts was created 3 days ago; I don't care what Internet Explorer is storing. You said he used your old username and password, I've quoted it on at least four ocassions. However, this website, which doesn't lie, shows that there was no old account name or password.

So, either you lied about him using an old username and password, which has been established to have not existed, or you are telling a big lie about your "son" making the posts. So tell me which is a lie and I'll stop asking you the same question over and over.

Obviously they used my username from my old account. To me its the same thing.

 

[ckobesko]

Obviously they used my username from my old account. To me its the same thing.

The must have registered on there own? Whatever, I have better things to do nite all.

 

[Cat_72]

How the hell would i know if they did? They stated they used my old account. I assume my password as well. Who knows.

The only account "ckobesco" is 3 days old. There is no old account. And you cannot create another account by the same username.

 

[ckobesko]

The only account "ckobesco" is 3 days old. There is no old account. And you cannot create another account by the same username.

Who knows maybe it was kingsnake I was on? Whatever. And it is ckobesko not ckobesco

 

[garweft]

Obviously they used my username from my old account. To me its the same thing.

They would not be able to use a username that is already taken.

Your lying, and not good either.

Just admit your a lier and a troll and be on your way.

 

[Jim O]

I love you

You're not my type.

 

[SoulSmilen]

Insanity.. who cares if it was the kid or the adult? It's done, the name is forever linked and life goes on! Why in the world are there almost 200 posts for this?

There is absolutely no way to know what is true and what isn't, so what the opinion is on something so trivial is absolutely of no importance; it's not going to save anyone from dealing with the person, it's not going to get anyone's money back, and it's not going to save an animal.

It could be the kid lying the whole time.

It could have been the kid at first, then the adult 2nd after realizing the kid(s) did this to this site and others.. which would also account for the slack wording in "has used my old password and username not only on this site but several others as well."

It could be the adult the whole time.

It could be the damn wife for all we know; it simply doesn't matter.

Chris or whoever you are: the message some are trying to get across referencing the kid thing and it being your responsibility in the end, is simply that. It IS your responsibility, no matter how, when, or why it happened.

Example: I have a 14 year old son who could do the same thing, and could pretty much take over my life if he so wanted. He knows usernames and passwords of mine, but he doesn't access any of it. He's responsible enough on his own through integrity learned from my example NOT to do anything of the sort, but is also responsible enough to handle things in the event I need him to, hence my trust. Regardless of ANY of this, if he were to wreak havoc with any forum to which I'm subscribed or anything else he has access to, it is NOT his fault. It is MINE, period; he is a minor. ANYTHING he does is MY responsibility. Perod. Fine'. 'Nuff said.

That's all that point was, and it wasn't difficult to understand.

 

[garweft]

Who knows maybe it was kingsnake I was on? Whatever. And it is ckobesko not ckobesco

There is no ckobesco.

cknott1048(0) find.gif 04-18-2004 3 10-17-2006 November 1, 1969
ckobesko(0) find.gif 12-31-2006 64 01-02-2007 March 28, 1986
ckoeppel(0) find.gif 09-22-2004 1 09-28-2004



Keep trying buddy.

 

[Gecko_Den]

so what the opinion is on something so trivial is absolutely of no importance

Yet it was important enough for you to make a post about how unimportant it is...?

 

[Cat_72]

There is no ckobesco.

cknott1048(0) find.gif 04-18-2004 3 10-17-2006 November 1, 1969
ckobesko(0) find.gif 12-31-2006 64 01-02-2007 March 28, 1986
ckoeppel(0) find.gif 09-22-2004 1 09-28-2004



Keep trying buddy.

Matt....I believe he was referring to my typo....I typed "ckobesco" instead of "ckobesko" in my last post.

 

[ckobesko]

There is no ckobesco.

cknott1048(0) find.gif 04-18-2004 3 10-17-2006 November 1, 1969
ckobesko(0) find.gif 12-31-2006 64 01-02-2007 March 28, 1986
ckoeppel(0) find.gif 09-22-2004 1 09-28-2004



Keep trying buddy.

Oh my goodness Who cares! Nite Lover.

 

[SoulSmilen]

There is no ckobesco.

cknott1048(0) find.gif 04-18-2004 3 10-17-2006 November 1, 1969
ckobesko(0) find.gif 12-31-2006 64 01-02-2007 March 28, 1986
ckoeppel(0) find.gif 09-22-2004 1 09-28-2004



Keep trying buddy.

He was referring to the misspelling of the name; these posts are getting ridiculous and everyone is so intent on catching a lie that will never be proven or disproven.

 

[ckobesko]

Insanity.. who cares if it was the kid or the adult? It's done, the name is forever linked and life goes on! Why in the world are there almost 200 posts for this?

There is absolutely no way to know what is true and what isn't, so what the opinion is on something so trivial is absolutely of no importance; it's not going to save anyone from dealing with the person, it's not going to get anyone's money back, and it's not going to save an animal.

It could be the kid lying the whole time.

It could have been the kid at first, then the adult 2nd after realizing the kid(s) did this to this site and others.. which would also account for the slack wording in "has used my old password and username not only on this site but several others as well."

It could be the adult the whole time.

It could be the damn wife for all we know; it simply doesn't matter.

Chris or whoever you are: the message some are trying to get across referencing the kid thing and it being your responsibility in the end, is simply that. It IS your responsibility, no matter how, when, or why it happened.

Example: I have a 14 year old son who could do the same thing, and could pretty much take over my life if he so wanted. He knows usernames and passwords of mine, but he doesn't access any of it. He's responsible enough on his own through integrity learned from my example NOT to do anything of the sort, but is also responsible enough to handle things in the event I need him to, hence my trust. Regardless of ANY of this, if he were to wreak havoc with any forum to which I'm subscribed or anything else he has access to, it is NOT his fault. It is MINE, period; he is a minor. ANYTHING he does is MY responsibility. Perod. Fine'. 'Nuff said.

That's all that point was, and it wasn't difficult to understand.

I agree, but posting someones personal info in an attack is ethically wring.

 

[ckobesko]

You're not my type.

How do you know?

 

[Mike Greathouse]

Tuesday night special at Fauna: All you can eat Troll buffet.

Keep feeding him and this will be 500 posts by morning.

Good night all....

 

[garweft]

He was referring to the misspelling of the name;...

I caught that after I posted.

 

[ckobesko]

Yet it was important enough for you to make a post about how unimportant it is...?

Hi Im geeko dan and i have waaaay toooo much time

 

[SoulSmilen]

Yet it was important enough for you to make a post about how unimportant it is...?

I wasn't trying to insult anyone and didn't tell anyone they didn't have a right to post, I am just surprised it has gone on this long. Hell, this is moving faster than the 'other' Chris's thread did.. lol

 

[ckobesko]

There was another Chris? Oh no I will be blaamed

 

[Cat_72]

Tuesday night special at Fauna: All you can eat Troll buffet.

Keep feeding him and this will be 500 posts by morning.

Good night all....

Point taken, Mike.

G'night.