• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Copy right laws and Tim Bowels

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Mans an idiot.

Fat timmy is an idiot and he is unlikely to sue anybody for using his photos.

Anybody who had the intelligence to earn himself/herself/itself the pile of cash required to throw that sort of legal action about willy nilly would have the intelligence to realise the futility of it all or they wouldnt be rich for very long.

Fat Timmy has neither the cash nor the intelligence-thats why his known as Fat Stupid Timmy!

Fat Timmy wipes the bottoms of the elderly for a living-Im sure this kind of work has its rewards but Im not sure they can be traded with lawyers for actions to remove snake pics from websites.

I hope your watchin Bowell's!


If you post someone else's photo on this site again without the owner's permission, YOU will be suspended from this site.
-WebSlave-
 
LOL Iv seen that snake before, last I herd it was shipped in a box smaller than the animal is, and it ended up with a respatory infection and then shipped back and 2 months later was advertized for sale for $6000 and was sold the next day. LOL LOL LOL
 
Oh no please dont take away MY photo-who says its theirs?

I hope I can get over this terrible chapter and turn my life around,if not for me for the sake of the children.
 
No Jim that was a pic of my own snake "Fatso"-honest!

Fancy threatening to sue Jim for using a snake pic Tim! Oh yes and reporting poor little me to the "webslave" whatever that is.

When I first found out I was in trouble with "webslave"(I frequently use the services of a girl with a similar name-perhaps you are related?- how much do you charge per hour?) a massive dark cloud fell over my day but fortunately thanks to threapy and the help of my friends and family I can learn to somehow live with 6 naughty points.

Remember my sad story before you dare to argue with big brave Timmy everybody!

Timmy you clearly suffer from a lack of real world authority!

Perhaps you should look into a career change get a position with someone beneath you you can bully-are such oppurtunities available in the fast paced racey world of the bottom wiper?

Im still waiting to hear from your legal team..................
 
Actually, Tim didn't report you, I did.

While some of your antics are humorous, there is a certain amount of decorum that members of this board are expected to maintain. We would all appreciate it if you would abide by the TOS (Terms of Service) and save the horse play for another forum.

And just to clarify, webslave is the owner of this site, and leader of the 'Fauna Cult' and he makes the rules. If you need more clarification, go to the "Webwatch and Cult Headquarters" forum and check out the "mario" threads. ;)
 
You should in my opinion go out more!

I will further investigate the terms of thingy.......

When you say " we would all" do you mean the whole of the world or any particular group of people?

Im sorry if I offended you "All" just I have had troubles lately coping with life since my naughty points.

I think I made my point though Timmy aint suing anybody is he?!

Kind thoughts and wishes:D

Rich
 
tim isnt gonna do a dammm thing. Jim put the pic back up!
 
I've grown tired of you, Mr Till. Since you seem to think that this site exists for your personal entertainment, it's now time for you to "pay to play."
 
Using someone else photo without premission is illegal however you put it. I myself would be pissed off and would rightfully demand that my photo was taken off the website before I choose legal action. The last person that stole one of my photo's had their entire website erased by their host company after I tried repeatly to get my photo removed. I don't care who it is, the photo belongs to the person who holds the copyright and they can do what they see fit to protect that copyright.
 
You know, Tim is, in my opinion, a bad guy. But what separates the good guys from the bad guys?
Simple, the good guys do do the things bad guys do. It's very rudamentary, kindergarden logic if you will.

Bad guys do things like:
misrepresent animals
sell sick/dying animals
steal photos and use them for their own
take money and never send out animals in return
etc....

Good guys don't do those things. Period.

Why encourage someone to do something illegal? Why encourage someone to become a bad guy?

And if you think it is such a good idea, why don't you do it your self?
 
Brett Nelson

I know that someone mentioned having emailed the lawyer with regard to this situation. Have you heard back from him? I am dying to hear his thoughts on tim using his name to bandy about useless threats.

Sincerely,

Gino 'In Da Bronx' Beniquez
 
LMAO......Who is being a troll now, Richard? You come onto one of the most respected and integral forums in the herp community and make an a$$ out of yourself. Way to go!:rofl:
 
LOL

As far as the lawyer goes...

Brett Nelson is a good buddy of Bobby Pruett's and Tim Bowles (according to Bobby) and most likely has already given Tim the go ahead to use his name.

All "legal" actions or warnings from the aformentioned individuals have come from the same lawyer. I wonder if this lawyer is licensed to practice out of the state of Indiana?
 
Why encourage someone to do something illegal? Why encourage someone to become a bad guy?

I would, but I dont have a site up. Tim is one of the worst guys in my book, and everything that he and Bobby did to Jim is in no way near posting a pic of an animal that jim currently owns. Its not even like Jim is claiming credit for the picture, he now owns the snake and wanted to represent it by using a picture tim gave him of it.

What are some other things we can do topiss Tim Bowles off?

David, i wouldnt even go there about making a totalass of yourself on one of the popular forums!:eek:
 
I finally herd back from MR.Nelson ( Tims Lawyer) I sent him a copy of the E-mail and this is what he had to say.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brett Nelson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 9:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: About Brett Nelson ( Attorney) (not spam)


Mr. Scharphorn:

Please note my correct e-mail address, in case you no longer have it in your records from our previous communications. I discussed this matter with Mr. Bowles when the first e-mail you sent to my firm finally made its way to me at the correct address. To be direct, I don't believe the e-mail you have forwarded is what you received from Mr. Bowles. Instead, I believe the e-mail you forwarded has been altered and that it originally was clearly from Mr. Bowles to you and suggested that you contact me directly (and provided my contact information) in the event that you had any further questions about the e-mail Mr. Bowles sent. I don't believe Mr. Bowles represented that he was me or that the e-mail was from my firm. If he did so in the way that you suggest, it would not only be improper but would be a very poor attempt indeed, given that (even in the version you forwarded) his name appears at the bottom of the e-mail and it came from an e-mail address unassociated with me or my firm.

In response to your questions: The e-mail message you referenced was not from me and was not from my firm. It does not appear that you believed to the contrary. The e-mail has nothing to do with how I or my firm "do business". You may not purport to be me. If you would like to hire someone to provide advice as to whether it is lawful for you to impersonate an attorney, you will have to look elsewhere as such representation would conflict with my representation of Mr. Bowles.

If your goal was to stimulate a conversation between myself and my client and draw attention to your copyright infringement, you have succeeded. You should be aware that there are significant statutory damages available for copyright infringement. Mr. Bowles has not yet hired me to represent him regarding his copyright infringement claim, though I would surely provide that service if he asked. Indeed, I might be willing to do so on very favorable terms given your actions to date.

Please don't hesitate to contact me directly with any additional questions or concerns.

Very truly yours,

Brett E. Nelson

Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
1346 N. Delaware St.
Indianapolis, IN 46202
(317) 637-0700
(317) 637-0713 Fax
http://www.psrb.com


Confidentiality Notice:

This message is being sent by or on behalf of an attorney. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
 
Sorry, just woke up, brain cells are still not firing exactly right.

Is this lawyer saying the following:

1. That you (Jim) faked the email the "lawyer" sent you and that the lawyer never sent you the email?
Please note my correct e-mail address, in case you no longer have it in your records from our previous communications.
The e-mail message you referenced was not from me and was not from my firm.... The e-mail has nothing to do with how I or my firm "do business". You may not purport to be me.

2. That you (Jim) are therefore trying to impersonate a lawyer with all the accompanying legal ramifications.
You may not purport to be me. If you would like to hire someone to provide advice as to whether it is lawful for you to impersonate an attorney, you will have to look elsewhere as such representation would conflict with my representation of Mr. Bowles.

3. That you (Jim) in attempting to impersonate a lawyer, and in faking his letter, did Tim and said lawyer a favor by bringing to their attention the copyright infringement?
If your goal was to stimulate a conversation between myself and my client and draw attention to your copyright infringement, you have succeeded.

4. That there is a monetary repercussion to Tim for you (Jim) having a picture of YOUR snake on YOUR website? (yes, it was bad for the photo to be there, but you HAVE remedied it, nor were selling the photo, nor were trying to profit off the PHOTO, nor would have "injured" Tim in any way that could be proven monetarily)

5. That the lawyer never sent you the previous email but you (Jim) are a bad guy for showing it to hiim and trying to impersonate him, and for having HAD (but do not HAVE) copyright infringement, your actions have stimulated his interest in representing Tim....
Mr. Bowles has not yet hired me to represent him regarding his copyright infringement claim, though I would surely provide that service if he asked. Indeed, I might be willing to do so on very favorable terms given your actions to date.

Again, I am totally confused by this message you received, as it makes less sense than the "armature" one.
 
I would also question why a lawyer would be letting someone know he might actually give his client very 'favorable' terms because of Jim's actions to date. Does this means 'Tim' gets a discount because of Jim actions? Why would Jim need to be told that? Seems silly.........
 
Sasheena, You may want to use your full name ( Required)

You confused me on that one, LOL

When I sent the E-mail Tim sent me, I asked the lawyer if this is the way he does business and if he sent me the original, and if it is legal to impersinate a lawyer the way it was done to me.

He claims that I altered the E-mail and it was not original.

As I can see it, when he called Tim Bowles on this ordeal that Tim pulled one of his stunts and Lied to his Lawyer and said that it was altered and he did not send that type of letter.

It just goes to show that you can be a bad guy and lie and hire a lawyer to fix it for you.

Just to anyone reading this, stay away from Tim Bowles ( Arboreals of the rainforrest )
It does not matter if its a snake or a picture, he is bad business.

( Just for those that do not know ,,, Tim hired this lawyer last fall to get me to pay for a snake Tim sent me,, We had a aggreement that I would pay by a certain date, Two weeks before that date I recieved the letter from this Lawyer to pay up within a week or be summonds.) Tim found out that I was unhappy with this snake because of the potential virus. (Tim had a snake turn up possitive for paromixo virus that was detected on a snake from his collection)

To try and explain what the lawer was saying on this responce.

That he may take me to court as a favor...The Lawyer says something like ( because of my previous actions )
My thought is, what actions was that ? Paying for a snake that I was unhappy with ? or was it because when he told me to send the money to him I sent it directly to Tim ? or was it because I told him( Lawyer) to not E-mail me again or I would press charges for hurassment ?

Sorry for my bad spelling and grammer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top