• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Copy right laws and Tim Bowels

Status
Not open for further replies.
Off Topic. This thread is about is Jim Scharphorn violaitng copyright laws.
Actually it is not about Jim violating any laws because he didn't. You are just being mellowdramatic. What happened to you Tim....why the complete 180 degree turn around? You can not be trusted from the continuing stories I am hearing about you. Your little copyright letter was in my opinion another 'scare' letter and that seems to make you feel like a big man. Is that what you have come down to....trying to be a bully?
 
Ghi Reptiles said:
Actually it is not about Jim violating any laws because he didn't. You are just being mellowdramatic. What happened to you Tim....why the complete 180 degree turn around? You can not be trusted from the continuing stories I am hearing about you. Your little copyright letter was in my opinion another 'scare' letter and that seems to make you feel like a big man. Is that what you have come down to....trying to be a bully?
Off Topic.

This thread is about is Jim Scharphorn violaitng copyright laws.:eek:
 
I think since Jim was in no way trying to profit from the picture and just wanted a good representation of an animal he purchasde that is not considered a copyright violation.

What about the filthy picture you have on your Redtailboa account? The one with my face edited into the subject matter of the pic. Don't you feel that is a copyright violation to have my picture there without my permission? My guess is you will stay far away from answering that question....;)
 
Ghi Reptiles said:
I think since Jim was in no way trying to profit from the picture and just wanted a good representation of an animal he purchasde that is not considered a copyright violation.

What about the filthy picture you have on your Redtailboa account? The one with my face edited into the subject matter of the pic. Don't you feel that is a copyright violation to have my picture there without my permission? My guess is you will stay far away from answering that question....;)
Jim's site is designed to sell reptiles for a business on the internet. Any material posted on it is designed to help sell and make a profit. Are you really that stupid Matt?

If he wanted to use my picture he should have asked for express written permission instead of violating the federal copyright laws and stealing it.

Go back and reread all these pages of posts and you will see you are wrong according to everyone but you and poor lil Jimbo of course.

Glad to see you don't understand the law Matty or are condoning illegal activity?

And as for the second half of your post, I was given express permission by the person that sent me that funny picture along with many others to do with as I please.

You will have to take you insanity up with them in your usual stalking manner. Maybe you could add them to your phone club list.

:eek:
 
Originally posted by Tim Bowles of Arboreals of the Rainforest
Jim's site is designed to sell reptiles for a business on the internet. Any material posted on it is designed to help sell and make a profit. Are you really that stupid Matt?

If Jim got someone elses permission to use that picture who would you have sent that silly e-mail to? Jim or the someone that sent him that picture?

You using my picture and placing it in the filthy pictures that you do and then posting it on another website just shows everyone viewing it and knowing about it what kind of person you really are. You are a discrace to this hobby and business and should be known for nothing less than exactly that.

Since I did not give you my permission to use my picture please take it off your redtailboa site and quit posting it on other forums in the disgusting ways that you are.

I can't believe you post pictures like that in the first place with a little girl around. What if she sees the filthy things you post?
 
Ghi Reptiles

If Jim got someone elses permission to use that picture who would you have sent that silly e-mail to? Jim or the someone that sent him that picture?
More of your made up fairytales and fantasies.

Let me help you understand this thread since you obviously cant grasp it.

Jims very first post where he asks if he(Jim) is breaking the federal copyrith law after admitting that he stole the picture and posted it on his site without permission.

jim scharphorn

Full Member
Offline

Registered: Feb 2002
Location:
Posts: 193
Feedback Rating: (0)

Warning Level: 8
[ View User Warnings ]

Copy right laws and Tim Bowels
...I purchased this snake and then copied the picture from the corralus open forum after purchasing it from Tim...

...I posted this picture on my website at that time...

I would like to here if he has a leg to stand on.

...If I can keep the picture, it would be nice to just rub it in Tim's face...
This is the illegal activity that you are defending Matt.

Is this your normal way of doing things?

If so, it really shows your true character.
 
Arboreals of the Rainforest said:
And as for the second half of your post, I was given express permission by the person that sent me that funny picture along with many others to do with as I please.

Sorry Tim ........But that pic of Matt was taken off a forum and as far as I know no one gave u or the person u got it from permission to use it ......Therefor u stole that pic of Matt just like u stole that pic of Tim Coplans .......And U are in breach of copyright laws in both cases .........as well the use of Tim C. pic ( being that Tim C is a minor in most states under 21) givesa whole new twist to what other laws u have broken by associating him with NAMBLA.......U a sick .....sick man
 
This is the illegal activity that you are defending Matt.
I guess it's not as bad as taking me for $2,500.00 and then bragging all over another forum that I helped pay for your new truck with that money....but if you say so.

it really shows your true character.
And in the last 8 months you have shown yours....;)
 
What exactly was the purpose of threatening Jim anyway? Were you going to sue him? How much would the suit be for anyway? $5.00? $10.00? How much is a picture worth that someone puts up just to show off an animal. It seems to me that any sane judge would say he was showing off what he bought from you Tim Bowles. He wasn't trying to sell it or offspring from it....he was just showing a good pic that you took of an animal that you sold him. Geez the guy pays you a good amount of money for an animal and wants to show a good representation of it and you come down on him like a ton of bricks....What class!

Seems to me I remember you asking to use pics of mine to post on the internet....and you did. Even though you asked, the same response should be extended to Jim not the BS e-mail you sent with Brett Nelsons contact info at the bottom. Quit trying to be a tough guy and come down to reality.
 
Ghi Reptiles
...Seems to me I remember you asking to use pics of mine to post on the internet....and you did. Even though you asked, the same response should be extended to Jim...
Yes you are right, I asked for permission first, I didn't blatantly steal them for profitting my website like Jim did. Key point you seem to want to overlook for your buddy Jim.

That's the difference between stealing and getting permission.

Do you understand that point Matt?

I guess not by your insane defense of violating Federal copyright laws.

You should, it's very similar to having a license for the turtles and not having a license for the turtles. One is smuggling and the other is legal harvesting.

Just to help you understand that you in the minority.

Here are the first few pages and the selected points to prove that you are supporting and defending illegal activities.
Chris Anderson
Chris Anderson
New Member
Online

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 19
Feedback Rating: (0)

Warning Level: 0
[ View User Warnings ]

...I inform them that I will follow with legal action if they do not remove it. I would go after you too for violation of copyright laws if you stole my work and refused to be reasonable and remove the picture. As I said, if I were Tim i would have been polite and talked to you first about it (based on your desire to "rub it in Tim's face", I tend to think he has or that you two have gone at it before) but if it came to it, I'd go after you too if you refused to remove the photo.

Chris Anderson

Neil Gubitz
'Just For Laughs' Guru
Online

Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts: 2014
Feedback Rating: (1)

Warning Level: 9
[ View User Warnings ]

Jim.... Unfortunately, it's NOT a gray area at all.... YOU own the snake and TIM owns the picture he took.... that's the law.... (There was a whole thing on "Judge Judy" about just this thing a month ago).... I would suggest that you just remove the picture and use one that you take yourself....

It's doubtful that he will really take any legal action, but, if he does, you WILL lose (again.... unfortunately)....

Neil

gila7150

Full Member
Offline

Registered: Sep 2002
Location:
Posts: 350
Feedback Rating: (0)

Warning Level: 4
[ View User Warnings ]

...you don't have a right to use the photo just because you bought the snake...
Chris Raden

dwedeking
Daniel Wedeking
Senior Member
Online

Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 865
Feedback Rating: (5)

Warning Level: 0
[ View User Warnings ]

In all honesty Tim owns the picture. Its the act of creating the picture that is copyrighted not the subject material.

Daniel Wedeking
www.exoticlizards.com
Scales - Premium Exotic Reptiles

Chris Anderson
New Member
Online

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 19
Feedback Rating: (0)

Warning Level: 0
[ View User Warnings ]

Yes it is legal to use photos of animal you no longer own and no, you do not have to have any permission of the owner of the animal to use that photo. As the photographer, you have full control and ownership of the photo. Selling the animal does not change ownership of the photo.
Chris Anderson
Bryan Cantwell
jungle boy wonder
Offline

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: indiana
Posts: 8
Feedback Rating: (0)

Warning Level: 0
[ View User Warnings ]

about his copyright argument...
while tim technically does hold the copyright for this pic...

...the instant he takes a picture he holds the copyright on it. it doesn't have to be published, it doesn't have to have his name on it, he just has to be able to prove he took it himself. (negs, digital signature from camera, etc...) (i love Communication Law...)...
Bryan Cantwell

Troy Dozier
New Member
Offline

Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 8
Feedback Rating: (0)

Warning Level: 0
[ View User Warnings ]

I don't think you understand how serious this is...
I don't know anything about the guy who took the photo. And I wasn't even going to post here because I am not directly involved. BUT, when the talk of knowingly stealing other peoples photos just to "show them", becomes part of this forum, I do have something to say.

I read the rules for posting here on the BOI. And though Rich doesn't recommend posting links to other sites, I am going to because the amount of text involved is enough to warrant it, I think. Plus, I doubt the links will become dead anytime in the future.

First of all, just because you buy the snake from someone, you don't have the right to use the photos the previous owner took. They photo is copyrighted the second he snapped the shutter on the camera. And unless he gives you written permission to use it, you are not allowed. Even in the UK. I think the UK has even tougher laws.

If I buy a snake from [insert big name breeder here], I don't get the privilege of using his/her photos now on my site. By the same token, if I buy a snake from [insert big name breeder here], and take a photo of my new snake, the breeder doesn't have a right to the photo either. I actually had a breeder fuss at me because I took some photos of my snakes and failed to include his name on the photo as the original breeder. That was an oversight and I added it. I meant to anyway because I wanted to give credit. But actually, he doesn't now have the right to come get that photo and use it because he once bred, hatched, owned the snake. They are two completely different entities.

And just because someone posts their own photo in a public forum, that DOESN'T make if a public domain image. Many quality breeders post photos to help others out. That doesn't mean that now I can steal that photo and use it on my site without permission.

If you really care about what the laws truly are and you don't want to read about kiddy porn, and murder then go to THE source. www.copyright.gov . If you want to download the PDF file of the US copyright laws in it's entirety then here is a direct link to that http://www.copyright.gov/title17/circ92.pdf

If you don't want to sift through the almost 300 pages of copyright laws just to find out how it pertains to photos. Then go to www.photo.net. More specifically http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a...g?msg_id=007J50 . They have extracted the photo part.

I don't want you guys to really get yourself into trouble thumbing your noses at this guy. He might just have the resources to make an example out of you. Though I doubt it, it's not worth the risk.

Hope this help,
Troy Dozier

Are you still condoning illegal activity now Matt?

Is this your normal way of doing things?

Your true character is coming out for all to see Matt.
 
Nett said:
Sorry Tim ........But that pic of Matt was taken off a forum and as far as I know no one gave u or the person u got it from permission to use it ......Therefor u stole that pic of Matt just like u stole that pic of Tim Coplans .......And U are in breach of copyright laws in both cases .........
off topic post

This thread is about Jim stealing my picture and violating federal copyright laws.

Oh Kenny, time to step up and issue some points for off topic posting wouldnt you say?;)
 
Yes you are right, I asked for permission first, I didn't blatantly steal them for profitting my website like Jim did. Key point you seem to want to overlook for your buddy Jim.
First of all there is no such term as 'for proffiting a website'. You posted this:

Any material posted on it (meaning Jim's site) is designed to help sell and make a profit.

Sorry Tim Bowles but this is simply not true. Is everything that is posted on your website 'Arboreals of The Rainforest' designed to help sell and make a profit from it?
 
So Tim,

Is everything that is posted on your website 'Arboreals of The Rainforest' designed to help sell and make a profit from it?

If every picture and text on your site is designed to help sell and make a profit from it then I understand your thinking....if not you are not making sense and are just being a bully.
 
Arboreals of the Rainforest said:
off topic post

This thread is about Jim stealing my picture and violating federal copyright laws.

Oh Kenny, time to step up and issue some points for off topic posting wouldnt you say?;)


No .....pretty sure this has everythying to do with u and copyright laws Tim .....So as far as I can see its still on topic .....Is this all u got ???????
 
So Tim,

Is everything that is posted on your website 'Arboreals of The Rainforest' designed to help sell and make a profit from it?

If every picture and text on your site is designed to help sell and make a profit from it then I understand your thinking....if not you are not making sense and are just being a bully.
 
Ghi Reptiles said:
First of all there is no such term as 'for proffiting a website'. You posted this:

Any material posted on it (meaning Jim's site) is designed to help sell and make a profit.

Sorry Tim Bowles but this is simply not true.

If Jim's site was not up to advertise his collection and in turn make a profit selling the babies, then why is this posted on it?

Why would he need a Terms page Matt?

Why would he need a shipping and guarntee page Matt?

Are you trying to say that Jim is giving his animals away?

Are you trying to say that Jim is not making a profit when he sells his animals by using his webstie to promote them?

You seem to know everything Matt, please fill us in on these details Matt.

COOL CRITTERS BY LJ | home

ABOUT US | SHIPPING AND GUARANTEE | CARE SHEET | CONTACT US | My favorite links | Meyer Parrots | Terms



Terms

Payment plans are a option, please call or E-mail me your offer and I will see if the offer is acceptable.


We accept credit cards through paypal please sign up for a paypal account at www.paypal.com
To make a payment to us with paypal please click on send money and type in my e-mail address of
( [email protected] )
We also take checks that need to clear before shipping and post office money orders.
Deposits are accepted and are non refundable.


Some trades will be considered, I am only interested in high end Arboreal species, husbundry equipment and select gecko's.
I am in need of a adult male corn snake.
 
Ghi Reptiles said:
So Tim,

Is everything that is posted on your website 'Arboreals of The Rainforest' designed to help sell and make a profit from it?

If every picture and text on your site is designed to help sell and make a profit from it then I understand your thinking....if not you are not making sense and are just being a bully.
My suggestion to you, in order to help you comprehend this issue, is to go back and read the motion I filed in Florida court. It will help you grasp this info that you seem to lack.;)
 
I know nothing about Jim's business practices or what he is doing with his site. But I do have a question for you Tim since you think this only applies to Jim and his site....

Is everything that is posted on your website 'Arboreals of The Rainforest' designed to help sell and make a profit from it?

If every picture and text on your site is designed to help sell and make a profit from it then I understand your thinking....if not you are not making sense and are just being a bully.
 
Ghi Reptiles said:
I know nothing about Jim's business practices or what he is doing with his site. But I do have a question for you Tim since you think this only applies to Jim and his site....

Is everything that is posted on your website 'Arboreals of The Rainforest' designed to help sell and make a profit from it?

If every picture and text on your site is designed to help sell and make a profit from it then I understand your thinking....if not you are not making sense and are just being a bully.
Again Matty,
My suggestion to you, in order to help you comprehend this issue, is to go back and read the motion I filed in Florida court. It will help you grasp this info that you seem to lack about websites. :eek:

But by your responces it is clear that you have no problem promoting and defending illegal activity.
;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top