Jim O
Careful with that axe...
Unless they can prove that he actually sent the e-mail, all they have is a text file. Without someone to say "yes, I received that e-mail" it would be easy to create reasonable doubt by saying Justin edited the e-mail before he forwarded it to the police. I doubt that any DA in this country would bring that case without a witness. I doubt seriously they would expend the resources necessary to scour Dan's hard drive to find it as no doubt he has deleted the evidence by now. Basically, without Justin, there is no case. That does not mean there is no crime, just that DA's have more important things on which ti allocate limited resources if the only credible witness is unwilling to testify.critical bill said:Jim, they do not need Justin to proceed against Dan on the offense of impersonating a police officer. Everything else could be dropped if Justin decided not to press charges and the state would still have enough to move forward.
If you were Dan's lawyer you could easily argue the threats, harrassment, intimidation, and extortion charges if they were to be brought against him. You would never raise any reasonable doubt that Dan didnt identify himself as a police officer multiple times while doing so. That is a seperate issue and no doubt would be a seperate charge.