• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Dan Scolaro bad guy.

Phobos said:
I'm not really interested in entering this full scale pissing match but I will say the following two things:

1) I've Known Dan for several years and seen his collection when I've been in the area to visit. I've never seen any sick or neglected animals in his collection. I've done business with him in the past and will continue to do so because I've found him to be fair and completely trustworthy returning funds promptly when animals arrived to him in less than healthy condition, rather than sending them on to me the customer.

2) I also know that BOI is not always a fair venue for discussions having been there myself. It seems more like a feeding frenzy than an actual distillation of facts.

Al


Thats all well and good Al, But, how can you ignore the possibility of an IBD infected animal? how can you support someone who Dosnt CARE that he MIGHT have it?

Thats the issue. Its wrong. Its been found in other snakes, are you really willing to take that chance? If he just got his animals tested, or actually gave a crap from the start about this, instead of blowing smoke screens through all of it, yeah, i would probably be more willing to see the other side of things.

These animals arent just stock. They arent just income. Theyre our pets. some, probably even considered family.

How is that right? for someone to not care even for a second... or even consider the possibility?

Then i say, help prove then, that this other guy is a complete and lying moron. This John Crickmer or whatever his name was. Prove it. I would be happier to believe that, and that everyone was led on by reports from a different snake that wasnt sent by dan * so he says*, than know that someone like Dan who might have it, isnt doing anything to SEE if maybe it was from him.

Its sad... all of this. Its not a damn joke. its not some "light problem" that will go away, this is a potentially deadly virus that apparently, the people with the money dont give two craps about. real nice.
 
GottaLuvHerps said:
Does anyone else see this where I highlighted???? If Dan has animals that are arriving to him in less than healthy conditions, why is he passing them on to customers in the first place to HAVE to return funds promptly??? This entire statement makes no sense. First Dan has animals coming in to him in less than healthy conditions (is anyone surprised?), but he has to return funds promptly (to WHO??), but he doesn't pass them (what??) onto the customer? My head is spinning. Again.



Dan, since you called me a "nice lady" in the email to Al, I will assume you meant me here. If not, I apologize for the assumption, but will continue just in case.



First of all, SMARTLY is an adverb. Although it is a word, you have grossly misused the English language and your grammar skills (again). Stop berating people for doing this when you cannot get it right yourself. You can't even spell most of the time, making your posts almost intelligible. The phrase you are looking for is probably "with some intelligence" or "with some smarts" in case you want to try again. DICTIONARY.COM is a wonderful place.
But, thanks for the compliment.

Please, do NOT mistake my honest account and posting a conversation with one customer of yours to be any sort of recommendation to do business with you to anyone else. I still believe that your lack of concern for the POSSIBILITY, even if it is a remote one, that IBD, which has been PROVEN to be a highly contagious and devastating disease (although you keep calling it "so-called virus" and "so-called contagious" and even questioning some of the greatest known experts in the field) has been through your facility, and you have POSSIBLY passed this one to countless numbers of customers (if your SO-CALLED sales numbers are as you say they have been since this post began are true) without one bit of worry. that is not only reckless, but one of the most uncaring, unprofessional, irresponsible things I have ever heard of. I could NEVER recommend doing business with someone who could act like this, no matter how many other "satisfied customers" you have had in the past. So, how nice am I now?

Let me get a few things straight about my conversation with Al for you and anyone who may think I want my name associated with you in any pleasant way.

1. YES. Al was EXTREMELY nice, polite, and an absolute pleasure to speak to in our long conversation. I do believe he was legitimate in his beliefs, and although I think he is misguided in his lack of concern for his animals and IBD, he's a nice guy.
2. YES, he said he had a great experience with you and that his snakes are currently healthy (which is further proven by th pictures you posted).
3. YES, he has had many years of experience with snakes, and he stated several times these are his babies, and he loves them like his children. I believe Al is doing the best he knows to do for his animals, but again, I say I think he is misguided to think he has no reason for concern.
4. Al referred to IBD as IBT several times during our conversation, and admitted that he had no real knowledge of what it was, how it was diagnosed, or what to look for outside of slight neurological signs. Several times he said "IBD or IBT or whatever it is," showing he has no real knowledge of the issue. He also basically stated that unless he sees signs or symptoms, he will not worry.
5. Al also said he uses rack systems for his snakes, and that the CRBs are housed directly above or below (sorry, I cannot remember exactly which) his Hognose boas. He did not mention any sort of quarantine procedures, so I cannot state whether or not his hognose's could be exposed to this, or any of his other snakes in his rack systems.
6. One thing Al said to me that I found very interesting, and I should have said before I guess, is that although he is not interested in coming to read this posting since he has already dealt with you (I did tell him exactly where he could find it), was that if he had NOT dealt with you before this and saw it, he probably would NOT buy from you as a new customer. So Dan, if one person that HAS dealt with you says this, how do you think all of the other new potential customers are viewing this thread?

Dan, you have repeatedly asked for proof of this, that or the other thing. You contradict yourself constantly, first saying there was no IBD, then saying you admit to IBD from the vet report, then start this whole conspiracy theory that the vet report was "mocked up" and that the snake in question was not even your snake. You claim that the buyer had other issues with claiming IBD. You degrade the idea of IBD by calling it the "so-called virus" and stating that it is "so-called contagious" when it has been proven MANY times over the years to be deadly, ruining collections and causing much heartbreak, lost time and money, not to mention business over the years. You even refer to some of the greatest minds in the reptile world as "so-called experts" and "this guy Phillipe," etc. I'll go pull each and every post you have said these things if you want me to, but I think we all know they are there. You say you have not lied. You have been caught more times in this post than I can count. You constantly contradict yourself, and poke fun at this entire threat of IBD like it is a child's head cold.
The reason I point these things out is that you think you have the right to ask for all of this proof, act like a fool and degrade the hobby/business and experts, but yet YOU cannot offer any solid evidence AGAINST anything that has been said. You come in with smoke screens of big talk (with bad spelling and grammar usage), claiming good business, all these satisfied customers, a perfect record, etc, but yet you yourself have offered up instances of unhappy people, and even someone (the other Al above) has said you have returned funds for unhealthy animals. Great, you send money back. Great, you have a return/refund/guarantee that you seem to stick to sometimes, if not often. That's WONDERFUL, Dan. You are like about 99% of the other breeders out there. You are NOT special for this. But you are special because you are ignoring this horrible thing called IBD that was found IN A SNAKE YOU SOLD, whether you did it knowingly or not. So WHAT that you gave the guy back his money for that one snake?? What about the effects of what is going to happen later, and maybe has started to happen now? Those things you conveniently ignore.
As a business person who has taken many years and much money and time to build up this collection you have, why would you even think that you should not offer proof or evidence yourself? This is not a court of law, but can be much more devastating than any court case could be. Although the "prosecution" here has offered the evidence to prove their case, it is now up to you to defend yourself with evidence to dispute their findings. You need to do this for your own reputation, and for the simple idea that your business is being effected (no matter what you say, you know that it is). It's simple business smarts, Dan. So start trying to retain what little respect you may have in this industry by not acting like a 4 year old who wants to take their ball home since no one wants to play anymore. Your bullying tactics do not work obviously. You sound more and more like an incoherent fool the more you post and laugh at people. You are holding on by a very thin rope, and it will break very soon (and that is being nice about it, as I think it has broken long ago).

Signed,
The nice lady who states things with some intelligence
Kelly

PS - I think many others here have offered up intelligent arguments, stated their cases with much poise, and have offered a LOT to this conversation. I am not the only one who can speak "smartly" Dan. You just can't read "smartly"

****** Applaud ********
 
ravensgait said:
As for your number 1 I can understand all of that except the "I will continue to do business with him". Myself I'd have said it more like this.. I would consider doing business with him again once he has taken care of this problem and could prove to me that his animals and facility were free of IBD. Al, if you read this thread then you know he sold an animal that had IBD. Dan has done a really poor job of lying and trying to misdirect this thread but the facts are here for people to see. Not having ever done business with Dan after reading this thread I wouldn't do business with him, his TOS sucks and his handling of problems well he doesn't handle them. Add in this IBD issue and people are going to run away. There are far better people I can spend my money with.

If this were say someone in the Cattle industry that had a disease like this they would find themselves under quarantine and all their recent customers would find Vets ETC climbing all over their facilities to see if they had this disease and would likely be quarantined till they were cleared. I mean come on we are under enough scrutiny from States and the Feds right now do we need some idiot like Dan adding to that? If we continue to show we are unable to regulate ourselves then one day we may find someone doing the job for us. We'll have the Dan's of the reptile world to thank when that day comes.

As I said, I do not want to be part of this pissing match so I said quite clearly what I thought about Dan. I do not have the time to wade through all of this crap to see what has occurred, then try to come to conclusion regarding IBD and Dan's actions.

Since I only keep venomous and not any of the "susceptible" species I am not too worried about IBD. Even less so since I keep new animals sequestered till they move on or become part of my collection after a suitable quarantine period. Many that move on go to Zoo's who then again quarantine them and test them again. I have never been told that they were positive for any of the nasties. So I have no problem buying from Dan if he has something I want for my collection.

Since I'm quite knowledgeable in these types of diseases from my real career not my hobby but not specifically IDB. I will read up on the topic, talk to real experts before I comment on IBD specifically as part of this thread.

Al
 
Al,
As you know, I keep only venomous too.
However, I was surprised by reading a paper posted by Jennifer Hedin awhile back, that IBD has also been found in S.A. pitvipers. So, that being said, it does occur in venomous snakes.

Randal
 
just to clarify

Just in case anyone is confused, as i have recieved a PM from Al Coritz that there may be some confusion -

The Al I speak of in my post is NOT Al Coritz (Phobos), it is the gentlemen named Al that Dan directed me to that purchased the other pair of CRBs. This would be the gentlemen that Dan posted pictures of holding the snakes who allowed me to post his phone number somewhere back in this mismosh of a post. I do not remember ever hearing his last name, although I probably have it in the emails Dan and I exchanged before (which were also posted way back).

Just in case anyone came in to this late.

Thanks Al C. for catching this possible confusion.

Kelly
 
Phobos said:
As I said, I do not want to be part of this pissing match so I said quite clearly what I thought about Dan. I do not have the time to wade through all of this crap to see what has occurred, then try to come to conclusion regarding IBD and Dan's actions.

Since I only keep venomous and not any of the "susceptible" species I am not too worried about IBD. Even less so since I keep new animals sequestered till they move on or become part of my collection after a suitable quarantine period. Many that move on go to Zoo's who then again quarantine them and test them again. I have never been told that they were positive for any of the nasties. So I have no problem buying from Dan if he has something I want for my collection.

Since I'm quite knowledgeable in these types of diseases from my real career not my hobby but not specifically IDB. I will read up on the topic, talk to real experts before I comment on IBD specifically as part of this thread.

Al


Al, it is being found in other snakes. Whether it is the exact same thing, or has changed, i do not know... but that is information that should not be ignored.

I was told this by Dr. Fitzgerald from Alameda East he Referred me to Dr. Douglas Mader, but i chose not to pay the 75.00 fee to speak with him that he wanted to charge, and there is another report ( can someone re-link) that says its being found in some vipers too.
 
Phobos said:
I've done business with him in the past and will continue to do so because I've found him to be fair and completely trustworthy returning funds promptly when animals arrived to him in less than healthy condition, rather than sending them on to me the customer.

Al C., can you please clarify what you mean by the above highlighted statement? It is very confusing, and alludes to the fact that you have received animals in less than healthy conditions from Dan?
If you have received these animals in less than healthy conditions, can you please describe what the conditions were when they were received?
If I am mistaken in what I think you meant, please accept my apologies. I would just like some clarification on what you meant.

Dan,
If you are receiving animals in less than healthy conditions, why are you passing them onto the customers in the first place? The fact that you refund money for those animals is a moot point, as the idea of passing on unhealthy animals to customers who may or may not have adequate quarantine procedures is an unethical business decision in my mind. What happens if one of your unhealthy animals infects someone's collection? Do you refund vet costs, costs of animals lost, etc?
 
GottaLuvHerps said:
Al C., can you please clarify what you mean by the above highlighted statement? It is very confusing, and alludes to the fact that you have received animals in less than healthy conditions from Dan?
If you have received these animals in less than healthy conditions, can you please describe what the conditions were when they were received?
If I am mistaken in what I think you meant, please accept my apologies. I would just like some clarification on what you meant.

Dan,
If you are receiving animals in less than healthy conditions, why are you passing them onto the customers in the first place? The fact that you refund money for those animals is a moot point, as the idea of passing on unhealthy animals to customers who may or may not have adequate quarantine procedures is an unethical business decision in my mind. What happens if one of your unhealthy animals infects someone's collection? Do you refund vet costs, costs of animals lost, etc?

actually it says quite the opposite.

He says that Dan did not send unhealthy animals to al.
 
This is where my confusion lies for me...help me if you can? I hate to seem ignorant, but the written word can be so difficult to obtain the true meaning.

He states that he has had great business dealings with Dan, but yet he knows that Dan is prompt at returning funds when animals arrived to him (Dan) in less than healthy condition before passing them onto him (Al) the customer.

If Dan is RECEIVING unhealthy animals from his sources, who is he needing to return funds to for these animals? Unless he is passing these unhealthy animals to customers, there is no need to return funds to anyone, but maybe Dan should be trying to get funds back from his distributors?

Maybe it is just me, and maybe I am reading the post completely wrong, it just is very confusing. Maybe there are too many Al's involved (hence my now referring to Al Coritz, Phobos, as Al C.)

So, Al C., can you please just clarify that statement so we are all on the same page as to what you meant? That may be very helpful for us all to know exactly where you are coming from.
 
I think it would be quite narrow-minded to not acknowledge that Dan has done a boatload of good business. For someone who deals in a lot of imports, one would expect a higher incidence of complaints, and the complaints against Dan are well within the margins. I think it improper, if not plain petty, to deride someone who posts here that they have done good business with Dan , and intends to continue to do so in the future, as to "each his (or her)own" regarding the IBD threat as they see it.


No doubt Jim, and I agree Dan has a good record. But the fact that Dan won't meet anyone halfway on anything is what leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. There's no reasoning with someone dumber than you, and even more unsatisfactory, I don't even think Dan is dumb. I just think he's playing a game here to ride over the first few pages of the thread where he mispoke [like a politician] about the IBD and cover it up with his incessant off topic and condescending posts, and hopefully cover up his errors. I won't allow this to happen so long as I keep up with the thread, and neither should anyone else.

It is the way people react to a crisis that shows their true characters and what they may be capable of -- so far Dan's true colors are showing as deceitful, arrogantly pompous and selfish, and a record [or lack thereof] for insanely piss-poor record keeping. If the thread has no effect on Dan's sales as he says it doesn't (have you checked the views lately? Chuck will update us soon...), he should have no problem simply admitting he has been lying and trying to cover up stuff that people consider much, much more serious than he does.

It'll never happen. I don't even think Dan realistically has IBD infected mites in his collection anymore. He'd have to be nuts to have them around with the ruckus we raised so far about it. But the mere fact that he won't admit he was trying to cover it up in the beginning and play vigorously ignorant about the IBD "virus and such" in his "35 years of breeding reptiles" is what won't set at bay the onslaught of concerned people.


Bear in mind, we're trying to reason with someone who said this seven pages ago:

I love to argue with these jerks and provide silly answers just to frustrate the hell out of them.
 
Phobos said:
As I said, I do not want to be part of this pissing match so I said quite clearly what I thought about Dan. I do not have the time to wade through all of this crap to see what has occurred, then try to come to conclusion regarding IBD and Dan's actions.

Since I only keep venomous and not any of the "susceptible" species I am not too worried about IBD. Even less so since I keep new animals sequestered till they move on or become part of my collection after a suitable quarantine period. Many that move on go to Zoo's who then again quarantine them and test them again. I have never been told that they were positive for any of the nasties. So I have no problem buying from Dan if he has something I want for my collection.

Since I'm quite knowledgeable in these types of diseases from my real career not my hobby but not specifically IDB. I will read up on the topic, talk to real experts before I comment on IBD specifically as part of this thread.

Al
Al, you knew when you made your first post in this thread that you were then part of it.. And why would you post without knowing what is going on here? yeah I know people do it all the time. Dan admitted to sending a snake with IBD thinking that IBD had something to do with broken bones(you got me on that one) Once he found a little information on what IBD was he started trying to deny it and now after having admitted the snake in question came from him wants someone to prove it did lol. The guy you are defending has come off as a first class scumbag so you might want to do some reading here. Also as noted above it has been show to affect the animals you keep. Sure hope you haven't gotten any from him in the last 6 months or so. I am really glad I don't keep hots as some of you guys seem to think you're immune so don't care, well guess again your animals can get it too . Gee that makes you a new member of the holy chit club of people who have done business with Dan..

Don't they all seem like good guys till they do something bad to the pooch and someone starts a thread here and low and behold they don't turn out as good as you thought. Randy
 
23,615 views!

Over 2,500 new views since I posted the last view count yesterday.

That's a ton of views! Its actually more than the total annual sales Dan claims he does.

A ton of immediate sales lost. A YEARS WORTH OF LOST SALES! POOF! GONE! BON VOYAGE! ADIOS!

The BOI works.
 
Mooing Tricycle said:
Thats all well and good Al, But, how can you ignore the possibility of an IBD infected animal? how can you support someone who Dosnt CARE that he MIGHT have it?

I have yet to see any conclusive evidence that a snake he sent has IBD.
Given the large number of snakes he sells, if he has IBD in his stock, would it not be logical to assume that at least one customer would have posted by now with solid proof?

If he just got his animals tested, or actually gave a crap from the start about this, instead of blowing smoke screens through all of it, yeah, i would probably be more willing to see the other side of things.

It looks to me like he either directly imports or buys from importers.
Which snakes should he have tested?

Forming an opinion when there are not facts because you don't like the way someone responded is not very logical, it's emotional.

These animals arent just stock. They arent just income. Theyre our pets. some, probably even considered family.

Yes. They are our pets. And for some people, they are one's livlihood as well.
Genuine cases of IBD need to be identified. Fear mongering over what might have been IBD but was not conclusively identified as such is pointless. I have no doubt that IBD is often used as a scapegoat for what has other causes but the proper testing just isn't done to rule IBD out.

Please note that I am not defending Dan. It's just this place reminds me way too much of the salem witch trials.

Get a biopsy that conclusively shows IBD. Then make the accusation. That's how it should work.
 
FunkyRes said:
I have yet to see any conclusive evidence that a snake he sent has IBD.
Given the large number of snakes he sells, if he has IBD in his stock, would it not be logical to assume that at least one customer would have posted by now with solid proof?



It looks to me like he either directly imports or buys from importers.
Which snakes should he have tested?

Forming an opinion when there are not facts because you don't like the way someone responded is not very logical, it's emotional.

.



Yes. They are our pets. And for some people, they are one's livlihood as well.
Genuine cases of IBD need to be identified. Fear mongering over what might have been IBD but was not conclusively identified as such is pointless. I have no doubt that IBD is often used as a scapegoat for what has other causes but the proper testing just isn't done to rule IBD out.

Please note that I am not defending Dan. It's just this place reminds me way too much of the salem witch trials.

Get a biopsy that conclusively shows IBD. Then make the accusation. That's how it should work.

Have you read this entire thread? I think not. Maybe you should start at page 1 and work your way through it. I find it hard to believe that you could ignore the posted reports, even though Dan has.
 
FunkyRes said:
I have yet to see any conclusive evidence that a snake he sent has IBD.
Given the large number of snakes he sells, if he has IBD in his stock, would it not be logical to assume that at least one customer would have posted by now with solid proof?



It looks to me like he either directly imports or buys from importers.
Which snakes should he have tested?

Forming an opinion when there are not facts because you don't like the way someone responded is not very logical, it's emotional.



Yes. They are our pets. And for some people, they are one's livlihood as well.
Genuine cases of IBD need to be identified. Fear mongering over what might have been IBD but was not conclusively identified as such is pointless. I have no doubt that IBD is often used as a scapegoat for what has other causes but the proper testing just isn't done to rule IBD out.

Please note that I am not defending Dan. It's just this place reminds me way too much of the salem witch trials.

Get a biopsy that conclusively shows IBD. Then make the accusation. That's how it should work.


Dan nonchalantly admitted that he refunded someone for a snake he shipped that died presumably due to his packing two animals in one bag and was diagnosed post mortem with IBD. There doesn't need to be more proof after an admission of guilt, does there?

Even if we grant that the likelihood of Dan having snakes with IBD in his current stock is slim, the fact remains that Dan has clearly indicated that he wouldn't know the first thing about testing for, controlling, or preventing an outbreak of disease nor would he care as long as he had the available funds to simply buy off dissatisfied customers.


FACT: Dan stated a snake he packed (improperly, leading to death) and shipped was diagnosed with IBD.

Do we need to go further to form a judgement?

FACT: Dan resorts to personal insults and accusations in response to genuine concern for the health and wellbeing of live animals in his collection and the collection of his customers.

Do we need to go further still?

FACT: Dan responds to dissatisfied customers by blocking their email.
FACT: Dan responds to dissatisfied customer that starts a thread on BOI by posting libel about said customer, then continues on to start his own thread in an attempt to manipulate public opinion in his favor.
FACT: Dan has used tactics such as threatening to raise prices to try and make high pressure sales.

FACT: Dan Scolaro DTS Herps is a bad guy.
 
Phobos said:
1) I've Known Dan for several years and seen his collection when I've been in the area to visit. I've never seen any sick or neglected animals in his collection. I've done business with him in the past and will continue to do so because I've found him to be fair and completely trustworthy returning funds promptly when animals arrived to him in less than healthy condition, rather than sending them on to me the customer.

GottaLuvHerps said:
This is where my confusion lies for me...help me if you can? I hate to seem ignorant, but the written word can be so difficult to obtain the true meaning.

He states that he has had great business dealings with Dan, but yet he knows that Dan is prompt at returning funds when animals arrived to him (Dan) in less than healthy condition before passing them onto him (Al) the customer.

If Dan is RECEIVING unhealthy animals from his sources, who is he needing to return funds to for these animals? Unless he is passing these unhealthy animals to customers, there is no need to return funds to anyone, but maybe Dan should be trying to get funds back from his distributors?

Maybe it is just me, and maybe I am reading the post completely wrong, it just is very confusing. Maybe there are too many Al's involved (hence my now referring to Al Coritz, Phobos, as Al C.)

So, Al C., can you please just clarify that statement so we are all on the same page as to what you meant? That may be very helpful for us all to know exactly where you are coming from.

The way I interpretted that original statement was that Dan may have required payment in advance or a deposit before ordering, or in order to hold animals pending arrival in a shipment, for customers. If such animal(s) arrived in unsatisfactory condition, the payment or deposit was then refunded to the buyer who wanted that animal instead of just shipping the animal(s) to them.
 
Dan nonchalantly admitted that he refunded someone for a snake he shipped that died presumably due to his packing two animals in one bag and was diagnosed post mortem with IBD. There doesn't need to be more proof after an admission of guilt, does there?

It was a mistake to pack two snakes in the same bag. That should never be done.
The diagnosis I saw posted looks like it could have been IBD but could have been something else as well. I did not see a conclusive diagnosis.
 
FunkyRes said:
I have yet to see any conclusive evidence that a snake he sent has IBD.
Given the large number of snakes he sells, if he has IBD in his stock, would it not be logical to assume that at least one customer would have posted by now with solid proof?



It looks to me like he either directly imports or buys from importers.
Which snakes should he have tested?

Forming an opinion when there are not facts because you don't like the way someone responded is not very logical, it's emotional.



Yes. They are our pets. And for some people, they are one's livlihood as well.
Genuine cases of IBD need to be identified. Fear mongering over what might have been IBD but was not conclusively identified as such is pointless. I have no doubt that IBD is often used as a scapegoat for what has other causes but the proper testing just isn't done to rule IBD out.

Please note that I am not defending Dan. It's just this place reminds me way too much of the salem witch trials.

Get a biopsy that conclusively shows IBD. Then make the accusation. That's how it should work.

This forum is here for people to hear the two sides and come up with there own opinion. Even that I disagree with Funky, it just his opinion on the said matter...
 
I would like to clarify that from the necropsy report on pg 42 I do think there is a very good chance it had IBD - I just don't think it conclusive.
 
Back
Top