Daniel has, as he stated he would in another thread, emailed me a vet report. It's too large to post here (it was sent in .bmp format, and even in .jpg it's over 1 MB per page) but I'll email it to anyone who is interested.
Before I say anything, let me say that there has been no photo shown, and there is no way to verify whether the animal referenced in this report is indeed the animal received from Lynn Peterson. However, there are some discrepancies that I will address.
For the sake of this post, I will add the content of the documents from Dan, verbatim, with quotation marks as necessary.
In the first page of this thread, Daniel states:
Quote:
One day about a month ago I went to feed them,when I pulled out the tub of one of the females she was dead.
The vet report states :
Quote:
It ate yesterday and there is food in the stomach.
Which leads me to ask why you attempted to feed a snake that had eaten only the day before?
Daniel states (on 12/29):
Quote:
I recieved a 1.2 trio of abberant snakes a few months back
The vet report states:
Quote:
and
Quote:
This snake was bought 3 months ago
The date of this vet report is November 15, 2004.
The veterinarian listed is in California.
Did the snake eat, die and get shipped to California on the same day?
The report is unsigned.
Daniel, I appreciate you sending the report. Can you shed a little more light on the issues above?