Dave Lawson Finally Where He Should Be

[critical bill]

sat = say.

I'm drunk...I make typos. BIG DEAL!!! LOL.

 

[Ken Harbart]

Bud,
Let me make this perfectly clear to you and your pal Bruce...

When you whine about other people's posts like you two incessantly do, backhanded comments such as, "no wonder your losing traffic on this site" aren't going to get you anywhere.

Aside from that, we aren't here to protect you from the consequences of your own idiotic, incoherent, and intellectually dishonest rants and rambles. You made your own bed, so now you can lie in it.

 

[critical bill]

Bud,
Let me make this perfectly clear to you and your pal Bruce...

When you whine about other people's posts like you two incessantly do, backhanded comments such as, "no wonder your losing traffic on this site" aren't going to get you anywhere.

Aside from that, we aren't here to protect you from the consequences of your own idiotic, incoherent, and intellectually dishonest rants and rambles. You made your own bed, so now you can lie in it.

That was cool.

 

[Stardust]

Um people. People? I do see in that pic a rollbar through the side window and the back window and I see racing slicks so what on earth makes anyone want to waste so much time looking up plates to a racing car that wouldn't need plates?

I go and watch a lot of drag racing and haven't seen any license plates on
funny cars or dragsters, maybe it's just me, LMAO!!! Perhaps it is just a plastic vanity plate??? LMAO AGAIN.

And this is about a reptile deal why? Because Bruce is reading this thread at a certain time pertains to all of this why? Bud made a good catch why? I believer Dave Lawson already said he races and has a car, just none of you believed him, so much for a tonka toy eh?

Damn it must be a boring day indeed.

 

[Karma Kritters]

The tags may be out of date. He may just have them on there for show. Back when we used to do alott of street racing people would bring in cars on trailers with bad tags to give the impression of being a street car. However I would not let the slicks and cage make you beleive it is not tagged either. My last car was caged and I drove it with street legal slicks to and from the track. Is there any way to check to see if there is any out of date vanity tags that match this one? I will check to see if anybody I know has seen this car. My cousin has a very reputable engine building company and they go to most of the big events here in the east.

 

[crotalusadamanteus]

How about Bayes 73 ? Or Dave3 73? Is it even a Florida tag? All the Florida plates I've seen are the newer versions. I ain't from around those parts, so I wouldn't know what the older plates looked like.

Rozann does make a good point though. It could be he trailers it in. Especially with the cost of gas these days. In some states, the roll bars make it non street legal. As well as the slicks in some states. Don't know about Florida though.

But you can't miss his name plastered on the window.

 

[crotalusadamanteus]

Its like watching a guy walking along while he's watching a girl walking along and then watching the guy walk smack on into a utility pole while his head is turned around backwards gawking.

Hey now, that can happen to anyone. Even me once or twice. Some things you just HAVE to get a better look at.

It's even worse when the one you are gawking at is gawking back, and watches you run into said post.

 

[bud mierkey]

sorry chuck

LOL....request denied. I know you said please, but I will take any tone I wish with you and there isn't a single thing that you can do about it. Or can you? There is the challenge I lay before you. What can you do about it?

sorry chuck I wont take your bait.
you are not worth it.
I guess you have a free pass here to do and say what you wish.
That says a lot.
I thought I was helping out posting the pic but I was wrong.
A few here have said it was a good thing,to them I say thanks.

 

[bud mierkey]

just what does bruce have to do with this thread?

Bud,
Let me make this perfectly clear to you and your pal Bruce...

When you whine about other people's posts like you two incessantly do, backhanded comments such as, "no wonder your losing traffic on this site" aren't going to get you anywhere.

Aside from that, we aren't here to protect you from the consequences of your own idiotic, incoherent, and intellectually dishonest rants and rambles. You made your own bed, so now you can lie in it.

 

[ravensgait]

Bud have you noticed that your coming to someones defense here is anything but help?? I imagine both Dave and Ed live in fear of your help on the BOI.

I do hope that someone can do something to recover lost funds from Dave with the help you provided Dave here...Randy

 

[Jim O]

I thought I was helping out posting the pic but I was wrong.

Bud, you were helping out. Even fools succeed on occasion. It's too bad that your posts tend to be 98% gibberish. And for the record, I agree with Jay and Ken. You're best off staying back under the bridge.

 

[snake5007]

sorry chuck I wont take your bait.
you are not worth it.
I guess you have a free pass here to do and say what you wish.
That says a lot.
I thought I was helping out posting the pic but I was wrong.
A few here have said it was a good thing,to them I say thanks.

Don't take my comment as a compliment Bud, you just happened to be hanging around with the wrong crook at the right time.

 

[critical bill]

I guess you have a free pass here to do and say what you wish.

Quite the contrary. I believe I have shown great restraint since my last fine & suspension and have been simply resigned to following the rules per the forums. Like for instance, in this forum I can call you a double scumbag fecal freak, and I wont get in trouble. Should I use such language anywhere else I could be warned to the point of a fine and suspension.

But here I've just wasted another two good minutes of my life on a worthless pile of poo like you who probably has no idea what the word 'contrary' means to begin with.

I'll bet you know what the word 'restraint' means though, right? That big old bad bruce probably uses that word in sentences frequently around you. You hear the words restraints and you run under the bed like an abused puppy.

Now do me a favor before I have to purchase some gold coins to point your sorry ass for posting off topic and keep your crap on topic. Got it?

And do me another favor and don't run back here with stories about how Lawson pals laughed at fauna because they live in the real world and pretend that you posted it because you feel differently then they do. You've stated many times how you think this place is a joke and has no real effect on anything in the real world. You're an incincere scumbag and I see right through you.

 

[DThomas]

I guess you have a free pass here to do and say what you wish.
That says a lot.
QUOTE]

I will not put up with anymore of these jabs Bud. They are nothing more than antagonism towards those that help this site out and will not be tolerated anymore.

 

[GinoInDaBronx]

Neil

Any updates Neil? I am sure that there are alot of us who are curious (And not-so-secretly rooting for you).

GB

 

[Dr Owens]

isn't name calling unbecoming of a doctor.

As Chuck has already pointed out, it wasn't name calling...it was a diagnosis.

id·i·ot [id-ee-uh

t] –noun
1. an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.

Here's the ICD-9 diagnostic code:
318.2 Profound mental retardation
- IQ under 20
- Profound mental subnormality

Yep. Idiot.

let it be noted I dissagree and resent your reply.
Thats all!

Yeah...I care. Idiot.

 

[Suncoast Herpetological]

As Chuck has already pointed out, it wasn't name calling...it was a diagnosis.

id·i·ot [id-ee-uh

t] –noun
1. an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.

Here's the ICD-9 diagnostic code:
318.2 Profound mental retardation
- IQ under 20
- Profound mental subnormality

Yep. Idiot.

Yeah...I care. Idiot.

If we ever meet face to face Jay...remind me to buy you a couple of cold ones.


Bud...you have artfully been served. I would retire to whatever fantasy sanctuary the Jedi are currently occupying and talk one of them into licking your wounds

 

[crotalusadamanteus]

As Chuck has already pointed out, it wasn't name calling...it was a diagnosis.

id·i·ot [id-ee-uh

t] –noun
1. an utterly foolish or senseless person.
2. Psychology. a person of the lowest order in a former classification of mental retardation, having a mental age of less than three years old and an intelligence quotient under 25.

Here's the ICD-9 diagnostic code:
318.2 Profound mental retardation
- IQ under 20
- Profound mental subnormality

Yep. Idiot.

Yeah...I care. Idiot.

Now pay the man his fee Bud. A diagnosis is a professional service.

 

[John Apple]

Any updates Neil? I am sure that there are alot of us who are curious (And not-so-secretly rooting for you).

GB

Yeah here is an update...while Neil changes the tire on daves car, his chain from his nipple to daves nether region gets tangled up in a tire iron....rips off the basic breeding properties of ol dave...thinking the poisen needs to be sucked out........well ya all get the idea

 

[Dr Owens]

Now pay the man his fee Bud. A diagnosis is a professional service.

No, no, NO! In no way would I ever want any sort of payment. That would imply a doctor/patient relationship. That, I can assure you, will never happen...for obvious reasons.

Besides, I'm not a psychiatrist.