oh dont get me wrong, everything on that lab report, to me as a veterinary professional, says ibd, i would just be concerned, that it wouldnt hold up, the way its worded, if you were to choose to, say go after the person for retribution or whatnot. on lab reports we get on our patients, there is 4 main sections: source (what was submitted), brief history of the patient (that we put on the submission forms), interpretation of results, and finally diagnosis. quick example, we have a coughing dog come in. an internist gets a tracheal fluid sample and we send it off. the lab result would be as such- source: tracheal wash fluid, history: dry hacking cough x 5 days (anitibiotics no help), interpretation: something like - 15-20 valley fever cell spores, per high power field (microscope lingo), consistent with valley fever, diagnosis - valley fever
they also throw in recommendation section sometimes. in this case it would read something like, recommend valley fever serum titer test.
so that example being said, i just didnt see anywhere on that lab report that stated, all out pure diagnosis as Inclusion Body Disease.
inclusion bodies, are basically a general term for cells (either red or white blood cells), that are seen with an unexplained, non-normal something inside the cell
