• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Dr. Jay Owens

Apparently, Brett's not especially tired of this sort of asshattery.

The latest victim of a Brett Gardin attempted character assassination is NERD.

Bob Clark (for propogating Burmese pythons, morphs, etc)
Dr Jay Owens (for actually having the audacity to use a title he earned through years of study and hard work)
NERD (for having one or more venomoid snakes in their personal collection)

Who's next on the hit list?
 
Suncoast Herpetological said:
I'm curious Ken...where is the lates case of character assassination by this weasel taking place?
It's on redtailboa.net, guised as a discussion of venomoids.

On the surface, his comments may seem benign to those who are unaware of the rather heated discussions Brett and Kara have had. The jabs are subtle, but to me it seems like a case of poisoning the well, so to speak.

Then again, I've been taking a prescription narcotic since yesterday morning, so perhaps I've simply misinterpreted what Brett said. The more I sit here and think about it, the more I end up second-guessing myself and believing that I very well might have overreacted.

What I'll do is quote Brett's post here. If those of you who are in full possession of your faculties tell me I overreacted, then so be it. I'll have no qualms about eating some crow, publicly admitting I was wrong in my interpretation of what was said, and apologizing.

I want the reader to keep three things in mind, however:
1) The views expressed on the linked page are not attributable to NERD.
2) Regardless of how you personally feel about venomoids, please keep this discussion on its present tangent.
3) I'm also going to ask that anyone who responds sets aside their opinions regarding Brett. In short, I'm looking for the answers to this one to be as objective as possible.

With all the recent unrelated drama in mind, I hate to be the one posting this...so I refuse to make any comment whatsoever as to how this makes me feel personally. I am simply reporting the news. Take from it what you will.

http://www.tinygiants.com/NERD/misc.htm

Warning: This link will infuriate some of you for a couple of different reasons. One being the promotion of voiding snakes for pets. the other for pointing a finger at a beloved member of the community who can do no wrong. I just feel strongly that in something so controversial, that people have a right to know...besides that, it was put out on the web for all the world to see so if it's something to be ashamed of then who's fault is that? It is not my purpose to start a flame here and I hope that this topic can be kept civil. As I said before, I will not be engaging in any argument here period. If I'm a jerk for posting this, please email or message me about it. Noone involved should be flamed over this personally. But I am still waiting for a valid reason to void hots so if anyone actually has one, I'd love to read about it. So far the pro-voiders are batting zero but maybe there is a valid reason noone has thought of yet?...who knows? I for one am always seeking enlightenment
 
I don't know for sure either Ken but, he does state that he has no opinion at the beginning and then at the end states there is no good reason for voiding, which seems pretty much like an opinion to me. If he really didn't care why would he have posted anything at all anywhere at all?

It's sublte but I think you were on the mark.

Wes Pollock
 
I dunno what's worse? asshattery or asskissery?

I know I promised Shane I would avoid any forum or thread that was haunted by mobster mentality but this has gone beyond rediculous. Character assassination? cmon Ken. Be real. At what point do the people in this hobby that you so worship achieve such a high roost on their pedistal that it's ok for them to practice what you despise?

You claim to be anti-void...but it's ok if Kevin and Kara does it cause they are your friends? It may very well be that the ones they have there now were rescues...if so, good for them! She has stated before though that they have had some voided for the shop. tsk tsk. But my main beef right now isn't that they have them but how they seem to display them to Joe Blow off the street, promoting the age old "WOW COOL" factor. Click on the link and it's easy to see the frame of mind this guy left NERD with, dreaming of one day owning his very own voided gaboon. Kara once said that they use voids for education and never let anyone know they are voids. Apparently that was just what we wanted to hear but apparently not the truth.

On to Bob...We all know there are way too many burms in rescue and too many problems that SEEM to be directly linked to at least SOME of the morph lines PROBABLY spread through overinbreeding. Bob is the biggest breeder of burm morphs I know...or at least broker...the last report I read from anyone actually visiting there said there really didn't seem to be many burm projects ongoing there. BD dieoff? I don't know. I can only guess.

Dr Owens is by no stretch an innocent victim. Do you really think I have nothing better to do than just out of the blue pick someone off Bob's site and do a background investigation? He was dogging RTB in a manner that just did not gel with what I would expect from someone mature enough to get through Med School and become a physician. His antics and childish namecalling made me wonder. Then when I got to thinking about taking medical advice from the man a couple of years ago...I got to really wondering...so I checked and there was as we all know by now, no record of any state issued license to practice medicine. So I asked. I had a right to ask as does anyone else. That's why it is public record in the first place. I got no answer. Just a deletion. Looked like a whitewash to me. So I began to get a bit miffed....at any rate by his own admission and definition found on page 9 of this thread and by every other definition I have found anywhere he is not yet a physician. He is a doctor though or so the evidence shows. But without a license he is still not a physician. The funny thing here though is I kept it civil...it was the reactions from the mob that got out of hand. BTW, Jay keeps a void copperhead LOL or did at one time anyway.

Now then, think about this. This is the BOI correct? This site exists for the purpose of inquiring on people's ethics, business transactions etc. correct? Again I ask, at what point does a breeder become above being questioned? I'm sorry I'm not in this to rub elbows and name drop. If something bothers me about even the Bobs and the Karas of this hobby, why am I not entitled to question some of their practices? I have had civil conversations with every person mentioned above and I respect a good bit about what each has brought to the hobby but no one is perfect and NO ONE is above having certain things questioned.

Wes, your comment is a classic example of what blew all this up. It's text for christ's sake...how can you possibly twist words out of context on something spelled out right under your nose? Where did I ever say I have no opinion? I am very outspoken agaisnt voids. Ok there is my opinion. I am not alone and I will never agree to disagree and sit quietly while people butcher venomous snakes for all the wrong reasons Nor will I sit quiet while people PROMOTE the buisness of venomoids. I said I refuse to make any comment whatsoever as to how this makes me feel personally. Apparently I wasn't clear in what I meant. It's simple, I'm not going to engage in argument with or about anyone from NERD in that thread on RTB. A lot of peole have a lot of questions and concerns and I wish for them to have a chance to get them answered before Ken or someone else turns it into a flamefest. Nice try Ken.
 
Ken, it appears to me that you are the one trying to start a flame. You have dramatically changed the direction of thread after it had all but died.

As far as the other thread. The link in question has been in the limelight on several other forums recently. So I see nothing wrong with it being brought to light there as well, and questioned.
 
Let me preface this post by saying that I no NONE of the people involved here on a first hand basis. I have never met any of them, and I do not even know what they look like (a fact that may be readily apparent to some reading this thread!). I have no axe to grind, nor a side to support. I dislike the practice of making venomoids, and see no reason for having snakes cut up in order to make them more "user friendly."

In short, I am truly a disinterested third part, who claims for himself a mild degree of interest for the purpose of trying to be fairminded here:

Ken,

I think that Bret ONLY posted that as he did to link NERD to the views expressed by the young man shown on the link. He said that he would not write about how he felt about what the link contained, but then he went on to "warn" everyone about how they might feel from the contents. He then went on to express his opinions concerning venomoids (still under the heading of the aforementioned warning, mind you).

Since there is nothing in the linked page that attributes ANY of the statements, which Bret found offensive, to NERD, one can only surmize that Bret is purposefully trying to paint NERD and the young man in the link with the same, broad brush. Should he? I don't know, because I am not aware of NERD's stance on venomoids. But for Bret to suggest that his post was simply an internet FYI, and not a slap at NERD through the veiws of one of their patrons, is silly.



Bret,

You said that Dr. Jay had on page 9 of this thread, by his own definition of the word "physician," implicitly agreed that he was not one. However, that is not what he said at all. He was giving the definition of a "licensed physician," which he is not by his own admission. He has not (at least not to my knowledge) yet completed the licensing process in the States of KS or MO, and so, he is not a "licensed physician." My hunting license expired at the first of the year, here in MO, and so I am not a licensed hunter. I have several rifles, shotguns, pistols, and kinves in my home, and I have about 30 dressed quail in my freezer. Am I not a hunter anymore? Silly again.

Oh, you also said that you could not find any definition of the word "physician" that would allow Dr. Jay to call himself one. Wow! You have a real dearth of dictionaries where you are, I suppose! Here ... let me provide you with the Merriam-Webster Dictionary (hardly an obscure referrence source!) definition of the word: "physician"

Main Entry: phy·si·cian
Pronunciation: f&-'zi-sh&n
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English fisicien, from Old French, from fisique medicine
1 : a person skilled in the art of healing; specifically : a doctor of medicine
2 : one exerting a remedial or salutary influence

The highlight was a touch I provided so you would not easily overlook the definition provided there, Bret. I hope it has been helpful.

As to the venomoid issue, I essentially agree that there is no valid reason (in my mind) to put an animal through that process. However, I do not believe that you, nor I, have the right to attack others for having veiws different than our own in such matters. Bret, some think that we are ALL inhumane for having what are essential "wild animals" in relatively small glass enclosures.

Even so, if you were not trying to take a poke at NERD by posting that link, what WAS your immediate intent? If you were trying to get at NERD, why try it THAT way, when there was NO reference to NERD anywhere on the page, except for a link back to the NERD site?

Finally...

B.W.,

You are certainly entitled to your opinion, as are we all. But I have to disagree with you when you say that Ken was merely trying to start a flame here. Bret's proclivity to attack individuals without regard to accuracy and/or fairness has been seen too often to go unnoticed, in my opinion, and such a post in this thread is justified, according to the BOI rules, it seems to me. Again, you are absolutely entitled to think and post that Ken was merely trying to start a flame on Bret here.

However, to be fair, Ken DID say:

"Then again, I've been taking a prescription narcotic since yesterday morning, so perhaps I've simply misinterpreted what Brett said. The more I sit here and think about it, the more I end up second-guessing myself and believing that I very well might have overreacted.

What I'll do is quote Brett's post here. If those of you who are in full possession of your faculties tell me I overreacted, then so be it. I'll have no qualms about eating some crow, publicly admitting I was wrong in my interpretation of what was said, and apologizing."

I've seen my share of flames on the internet in general, and on the BOI in particular, B.W., but I have never seen one started off like that! Have you?

Ken may have a sore spot in relation to Bret because of his past antics, but that's what having a reputation for being a character assasin will get you, Bret! Bret really needs to be able to admit when he's wrong in relation to Dr. Jay and his qualifications to call himself "Doctor, physician, healer, etc."

And B.W. and I are merely expressing our opinions on the matter as was requested by Ken in the first place. Mission accomplished.
 
What an idiot!

Proofred, proofred, proofred! :D


Obviously,

"Let me preface this post by saying that I no NONE of the people involved here ..."

Should ACTUALLY read as,

"Let me preface this post by saying that I know NONE of the people involved here ..."


Hillbilly edjumacations is good 'nuff fer me!
 
Brett, if you'd get over your indignation for a moment and read on, I stated that it's entirely plausible that I'm wrong in my interpretation of what you had posted, and that I was beginning to feel that I had overreacted. I had stated that I have no qualms whatsoever about eating some crow, publicly admitting I was wrong, and apologizing.

Now then, let's address some of the other points that you've made in regards to this latest issue.

Character assassination? cmon Ken. Be real. At what point do the people in this hobby that you so worship achieve such a high roost on their pedistal that it's ok for them to practice what you despise?
Firstly Brett, I don't "worship" any man or woman who walks this Earth. There's people whose accomplishments I respect, but I view them as peers, and not superior entities.

Secondly, let's touch on your assertion that I'm selectively duplicitous in my opinion regarding venomoids. I have publicly stated that I'm generally anti-venomoid. I have also stated that I'm not going to roast anyone over the coals for the mere act of owning a venomoid... I could care less if it were NERD or Jesse Underhill. I'm also adverse to the wholesale importation of wc ball pythons. Does this mean I should ostracize every hobbyist that has a ltc ball python in their collection?! Being generally opposed to something doesn't necessarily mean that I have to be rabid and intolerant in my beliefs.

Now, since that's been said, I'll go out on a limb here and state that I most likely did overreact to Brett's post. There's much that Brett and I will never agree on, but I will offer a public apology to Brett right here and now for jumping the gun and not taking it up with him privately.
 
Yo Darrin, if you are going to cut and paste a definition, PLEASE include the whole thing and not just the part that proves your point and omitting the part that proves mine.

*** Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) ***
Physician \Phy*si"cian\, n. [OE. fisician, fisicien, OF.
physucien, a physician, in F., a natural philosopher, an
experimentalist in physics. See {Physic}.]
1. A person skilled in physic, or the art of healing; one
duty authorized to prescribe remedies for, and treat,
diseases; a doctor of medicine.

Wordnet (r) 1.6
physician
n : a licensed medical practitioner; "I felt so bad I went to
see my doctor" [syn: {doctor}, {doc}, {MD}, {Dr.}, {medico}]

His is neither licensed nor duty authorized to practice medicine.

What is my point? I have none anymore. I was concerned whether he ever even attended med school because AT THE TIME I asked, All I knew was he claimed to be a doctor and when I asked about it after finding no license on record, he just deleted my posts and account. IF you were me, how would that make you feel? What would you suspect? I always thought once you were a doctor, you were granted a license and that license was of public record and stayed there till you got caught trading prescriptions for mud tires or something. I was wrong. Dr Owens more than cleared that up finally with his photo of his expired license to train and his explination that that type of license was NOT of public record. I had a reason for asking and digging and I explained it. I knew when I asked that it would probably fire up the mob a bit but I really didn't care. I had questions I wanted answered and they were answered once I finally plucked the bits and pieces out of the threats and childish name calling. I'm relieved that he at least finished Med School and I can now stop worrying so much about the medical advice he freely handed out. I don't care what title he uses at this point. I have a better idea now of his level of expertise and how to take his advice.

Maybe some define "physician" different than others. I see it as a job title working as a doctor with a license. If you see it different, FINE. Who cares? No definition I can find ommits the need for a license though.

And no...if you hunt without a license, you aren't a hunter, you are a poacher. There is a difference there too.
 
That's cool Ken. I appreciate that. Please keep in mind that while some people are passively against it that others are strongly against it. I am definatly of the latter group. I know that there are many people that are all for them and think they are the greatest thing. Otherwise, there would be no debate....but still, none of this current void thing has anything to do with this particular thread and I'm a bit confused as to why it was brought up here.
 
Brett (sorry I misspelled your name earlier, by the way),

I did not cut out any of the definition given in the source I used for any reason. I cited the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, and I FULLY pasted what was given there. Please do not infer that I would purposefully mislead people to suit my own views! I am fairly well known for being one who does not tell falsehoods, and I do not cut and paste falsehoods (or half-truths) either.

Also, the ONLY reason I addressed the issue concerning your statement about not having found a definition of "physician" that would be inclusive of Dr. Jay, is because YOU brought it up! Not just earlier, but in this very thread just a few pages ago! Please be kind enough to admit that you asked for the definition (by your implied lack thereof), and I simply supplied it to you.

Finally, I take offense to the term "poacher" being applied to me. I did not say that I was taking any game without a license, nor did I imply such. If you inferred it, it was due to your own preconceptions or misreadings, not by my statement taken on its face. I am a "hunter" because I hunt animals. However, I am not currently licensed, so I am not currently a "licensed hunter." If I took game without my license intact (which I would NEVER DO!), I then, and only then, be a "poacher." Just because you do not want to admit that you were/are wrong about the definition of "physician" being one that is broad enough to include Dr. Jay as he now is, please do not feel the need to insinuate that I might be a violator of the laws concerning conservation practices. I take them very seriously.
 
I didn't mean to imply that you "are" a poacher. But we agree that if you hunt without a license then you are a poacher. So currently, you are an exhunter and maybe a future hunter but right now you are not hunting anything and don't hold a license so no....right now I wouldn't call you a hunter anymore than I would call an unlicensed doctor a physician...But maybe that's just me. Maybe my views on some things are a bit different than yours. Big Deal. I used to hunt a long time ago. I still have guns. I never intend to hunt again. Am I still a hunter because I once hunted? Or do I need to intend to hunt again some day to still consider myself a hunter? What I am getting at is this isn't about was or will be. It is about NOW.

From Dr Owens on page 9 of this thread:

Sybella,
You are correct, but please allow me to add a few points of clarification. Once someone graduates from medical school, they have 2 major obstacles to overcome in order to become a licensed physician. First, they have to pass part 3 of the National Boards, which I did in December 2001. Second, they have to complete their first year of residency (i.e. their internship year), which I completed in June 2002.

Once those two things are done, it is simply a matter of turning in your license application in order to obtain a permanent medical license from the state board. For the record, these applications are freaky huge and they delve into every little detail of your life before a license is ever issued. This investigation is done to make sure that a medical license is never given to someone who has ever been convicted of a felony, or someone who might have mental health issues, or has substance abuse problems.

Anyway, the only reason that I don't carry a medical license right now is simple...

OK...so he has completed the preliminaries but not the final process. When or if he completes that then he will be a physician IN MY OPINION and the opinion of Mr Webster and Mr Wordnet. That's great....and truthfully...close enough I guess. Had he come forth with this in the beginning, I think this would have fizzled out a lot quicker. Deleting the posts just made it look like a coverup and I seriously doubted that he ever even went to med school because of it at the time. I don't know Jay like a lot of you do. All I knew about him was for a few years now, he has been sporting the Dr title and it never occured to me that anyone using the titles Dr and Physician for the 3 years that I have known of him would still be lingering in the licensing process. I admit ignorance on much of how that works. After a number of years, I made the assumption that he was an established doctor. He certainly projects the image. So when there was no license on record, it all reeked of fraud. But I did not accuse him. I asked him what was the deal...after much fuss, I now finally understand the deal and am satisfied. Why aren't you? lol. I'm truely sorry for all the mess here. But I'm not sorry for inquiring because I feel it is both a right and an obligation for ourselves to check out "doctors" when in question. Inquiring does not constitute libel even if you are wrong. In fact it gives the good doctor a chance to gloat and strut his credentials so really, what's the big deal?
 
I've seen my share of flames on the internet in general, and on the BOI in particular, B.W., but I have never seen one started off like that! Have you?

You are correct. And he did qualify his statement with the use of narcotics :D (sorry, had to be said LOL). Perhaps "flame" was the wrong word. It seemed to me more along the lines of "placing the BOI crosshairs BACK on Brett".

And of course, I will try to qualify MY statement (without the use of narcotics :laugh: , had to be done. Ya can't give me an opening like that ;) ) This thread had all but died. The final words were a deserved appology for insinuations of hacking. It seemed to be the conclusion. But out of the blue, I see a post, referring to another thread, on another forum. And when the first couple lines of Ken's post read
Apparently, Brett's not especially tired of this sort of asshattery.
The latest victim of a Brett Gardin attempted character assassination is NERD.
it appears to ME that it is an attempt to bring the crosshairs back down on Brett.

I feel that this is a good point for me to go ahead and state my position so I do not get the standard "You are just saying that because of ......" attack.
1. I am friends with Brett
2. I am militantly anti-venomoid
3. I call them like I see them. And those that know me, expect nothing but brutal honesty, even if it hurts their feelings (tact is not one of my stongsuites).
4. I am not a fan of NERD. I do not agree with much of what they do, particularly linebreeding/inbreeding and venomoids ( I remember posts after they are deleted ;) ). By the same token, if someone askes me about Glades I would tell them flat out that I will never buy a cricket from them, much less a snake, because I have witnessed the selling of voids and other unethical practices regarding hots. NERD is not a target, simply on my list of "not to do business with" and if someone asks me about ANY company on my list, they will be told why I PERSONALLY do not deal with them. Then I leave the decision up to them.
5. I do not take sides based on a relationship. I stand steadfast by what I believe is right. The biggest fight I ever had with my ex was when I would not automatically take her side when I heard 2 conflicting stories on an event I did not witness :laugh:

Now I will be the first to admit that these truths may make me biased in my interpretation, but that is how I saw it.
 
it appears to ME that it is an attempt to bring the crosshairs back down on Brett.
Brian, much the same can be (and has been) said for the post I quoted appearing to be an attempt to bring the crosshairs on NERD.
 
I didn't put anyone in any crosshairs. If NERD is in the crosshairs it is because of the way they obviously presented their voids to some guy that went to visit them and left with great admiration of how Kevin "freehandles" all his voids. I don't care if it's NERD or GEEK or BillyJoeJimBob's Petstore on the corner of Walk and Don't walk, anytime I see this kinda showboating with voids it upsets me and others who are strongly anti-void. I would be a total hypocrite if I were to let "WHO" is involved decide whether it is right or wrong. BWSmith is one of my closest herp friends. If this happened at his house, I would be have made the exact same post. BTW apparently this has been a topic on other sites too and a lot less civil than the way we have kept it. ...and once again, even if I were bringing the crosshairs on NERD, what's that got to do with Jay owens? Didn't you give me warning points for beating a dead horse a month ago when this thread was still fresh and I finally decided to speak my mind on the subject here? and then a month after it's death, you yourself decide to beat it some more? irony.
 
Has anyone actually asked Kevin or Kara or anyone else from N.E.R.D. how they present the animals, where the animals came from, why they have them or who this person was?

Some anonymous individual comes away with a certain impression... doesn't automatically mean he was told or shown ANYTHING. I've talked to people for hours on end about a subject and they leave just as clueless as when they started... some people are just predisposed to jumping to idiotic conclusions.

It's very sad when I represent the voice of reason... Unless a duly authorized representative of NERD comes forward and says "We love slinging venomous snakes around, in fact the entire company is composed of snake handlers... we huff gasoline fumes and do dumb things." then some third party nit-wit posting photos with text they created themselves means absolutely nothing. And since I really doubt anyone at NERD is disrespectful in the way they handle animals, that public statement isn't likely to be quick in coming.

Rather than going after NERD, why not go after the moron who posted the out of context photos with his own brainless interpretation? THAT is clearly someone glorifying voids... as of right now, there's no reliable proof that anyone from NERD shares those views.

And damn Brett... you have a craptacular sense of who to go after. If you can manage to find someone MORE credible than the people you have decided to go bonkers on, I'd love to see it. Who's next on your hit list, eh? Jim Fowler? Louie Porras? The Pope? Yeesh, even monkeys will learn from negative responses to stimulus after one or two shocks.
 
Yeesh, even monkeys will learn from negative responses to stimulus after one or two shocks.
LMMFAO.

Oh that was good...

Give it up Brett. Everytime I think you've hit the bottom, you find a way to dig your hole a little deeper.
 
Ahh but you just assume I went after NERD. I simply posted the link where it was evident that Kevin was showing off his voids. If you take that as a slam on NERD then you read into it exactly what it looks like happened there. Once again my intentions and words are twisted to suit the heckler's cause. Did you guys even bother to click on the link and read the comments? Why is it that you guys feel so strongly that certain people are above having anything they do critisized? If you feel that showboating and promoting voids is OK, please just say so. I feel that it is wrong and I said so. Please also keep in mind that I did NOT bring it up here. Ken brought it here and went off topic on a dead post. How am I digging a hole by voicing my displeasure for such an event? Several other people were outraged as well and voiced their thoughts too. Why am I responsible for NERD reps not posting their side of the story? Perhaps they will get here when they get caught up on the other forums where this is being discussed. Perhaps not. It really isn't my problem. I truely hope that NERD isn't doing what that link suggests that they are. I would be thrilled if kara or someone comes in and says the guy made all that crap up and has never even been to NERD. I'm not out to harm reputations. I'm out to make clear to people promoting voids that there are many of us who are so much against it that they will never get our business nor our recomendations. Maybe that will help the cause. Maybe it will not. Just because a few people from Bob Clark's site came here screaming that I'm an idiot because of a few differences on opinion and ethics and that no one likes me does not make it so. I still have the same friends I started with. This has all turned into a childish "who can come up with the wittiest zinger" contest. To some of you, just because it gets a few attaboy's from a certain mob, then you think anything I say is some sort of scandal or flamebait. This is simply not the case. I'm against a certain principal here not NERD or any sigled out person or intity. If NERD or anyone else through their very on actions places themselves in the "crosshairs" that is their own fault. The "crosshairs" were their long before NERD stepped into them. The void debate has been a focus of a lot of people for a long time and will continue to be that and no one, I repeat NO ONE found promoting it or practicing it will ever be too good to be scrutinized by those of us who are especially passionate on the subject.

I am now officially through with this thread. I don't even care to read any answers to the questions I just asked...ask them to yourselves or amongst yourselves. i really don't care. No part of this thread was ever my idea on this forum. I had some things to say in response to some things and I said what I needed to. Some liked it. Some didn't. Again...not my problem. Asskissery is not my job title here. It is impossible to debate anything in a way that pleases everyone. My mind is made up on certain issues and so is some of your's so really, what's the point?

Peace Out and happy herping.
 
Brian, much the same can be (and has been) said for the post I quoted appearing to be an attempt to bring the crosshairs on NERD.

I can see that interpretation as well. The reason that I do not hold to it is because that link has been circulating a great deal lately with much the same comments and concerns. I don't think the RTB thread would have been as big an issue had someone besides Brett posted it.

Has anyone actually asked Kevin or Kara or anyone else from N.E.R.D. how they present the animals, where the animals came from, why they have them or who this person was?

I originally posted some straight forward questions on the RTB thread for clarification and am awaiting response from NERD. Much of thread in question was lost die to a server error, and it appears it has regained it's course of venomoid debate.
 
Back
Top