• In case most of you have not noticed, I made changes to the donation amounts as well as the durations for all of the paid membership levels. Things are winding down here, and this seems to be the most prudent way to deal with the "end of life" period of this site.

    Contributor level members - $10 per 30 days
    Sponsors - Eliminated
    Benefactor level members - $25 per 30 days
    Endowment level members - $50 per 30 days

    Account Upgrades Page
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Ed Clark,don't buy frogs from him!

Ed Clark said:
My comment about a negative test was said after reading someone posting that on this thread.....scroll back some and you will see where it is stated that the cf test came back negative.
Click to expand...
Isn't it just like Ed to lie in order to try to get out of getting caught in a lie? I guess we all define our personal morality differently. Ed, you're a real piece of work. :rolleyes:
 
The parent btw, speaking as one, is responsible for veterinary care. Animals are considered property and no minor can legally own anything.
Like Deborah said if it was your kid would you let them treat their pets?
You don't have kids right?
 
I was just curious, as far as I know he isn't.

Mr. Moore- or anyone else who can help me with the scientific name thing.
On ISIS they have Australian dumpys and the scientific name listed says Arenophyne.
Under whites tree fogs it says Pelodryas Caerulea.
I thought the correct name was Litoria Caerulea.
Mr. Moore,which taxonomic or scientific name are the Aussie whites listed under on ISIS? Did you look under the common name as well?
I am not familiar at all with these names and go by the common one.
When I was searching care sheets they all say Litoria Caerulea.
Don't the zoos list them by both?
I also didn't see any births listed under any of these categories.
Maybe the zoo is relying on Ed's word also?
 
Dr. Owens, are you a herp vet? Would you mind looking at the necropsy on page 5 post #186 and offering your opinion Sir?
 
K412 said:
Mr. Moore- or anyone else who can help me with the scientific name thing.
On ISIS they have Australian dumpys and the scientific name listed says Arenophyne.
Under whites tree fogs it says Pelodryas Caerulea.
I thought the correct name was Litoria Caerulea.
Mr. Moore,which taxonomic or scientific name are the Aussie whites listed under on ISIS? Did you look under the common name as well?
Click to expand...
Well, I am not Mr. Moore, and I am sure he will correct me if I am incorrect, but I believe the White's Tree Frog is of the Hylidae subfamily of Pelodryadinae; Genus Litoria; Species caerulea.
 
K412 said:
I was just curious, as far as I know he isn't.

Mr. Moore- or anyone else who can help me with the scientific name thing.
On ISIS they have Australian dumpys and the scientific name listed says Arenophyne.
Under whites tree fogs it says Pelodryas Caerulea.
I thought the correct name was Litoria Caerulea.
Mr. Moore,which taxonomic or scientific name are the Aussie whites listed under on ISIS? Did you look under the common name as well?
I am not familiar at all with these names and go by the common one.
When I was searching care sheets they all say Litoria Caerulea.
Don't the zoos list them by both?
I also didn't see any births listed under any of these categories.
Maybe the zoo is relying on Ed's word also?
Click to expand...
When I did the search, I went by common name (W for White's Tree Frog).

Pelodryas and Litoria are often used in synonymy for caerulea. Litoria was the original classification, Pelodryas came later (1973 - Savage)...largely because it was felt that caerulea differed enough from the rest of the group to merit separation. I don't know if the two are interchangeable for other species, as they are for caerulea. Zoos and scientific institutions would (in most cases, lol) use the most current taxonomy, which is why they are listed as Pelodryas caerulea on ISIS.

The problem with using common names is that they sometimes overlap and/or vary, as you discovered. You looked up Australian dumpy, and found a totally different animal (Arenophryne rotunda - which is not a tree frog, and not even a member of the same family).
 
John E Dove said:
Well, I am not Mr. Moore, and I am sure he will correct me if I am incorrect, but I believe the White's Tree Frog is of the Hylidae subfamily of Pelodryadinae; Genus Litoria; Species caerulea.
Click to expand...
No correction needed :D
 
Ed Clark said:
Yes they are children, thats why I offered 2 options.

Think about how a child would come up with a couple hundred dollars to treat a sick frog that will probably die anyway?

Then what?

How does that child deal with loseing all that money and the pet frog also?
Click to expand...

When you get sick Ed can I stick you in a freezer and let you lay there conscious while your blood crystalizes? I wouldn't do it to any of my herps. You on the other hand..... :reddevil:
 
crazyfroglady said:
When you get sick Ed can I stick you in a freezer and let you lay there conscious while your blood crystalizes? I wouldn't do it to any of my herps. You on the other hand..... :reddevil:
Click to expand...


Why wait??? I think he's pretty sick right now!!!
 
Ed Clark never answers direct questions. He simply tries to deflect attention elsewhere. He's mastered the art of dodging the question with a :shrug01: attitude. Oh - then he'll blatantly flash you another picture to pimp his animals. Fatfrogs staff was warned of this behavior but chose to ignore it last year because they were hypnotized by all the pretty pictures.
 
Something to the effect of
We don't care about problems with his snake transactions because he is good to us...if he screws one of us over on a frog deal, then we'll worry about it.
roflmao
It's not even that I think Ed did anything wrong on this one - because I don't - but the frog huggers were so set on defending him that they deleted anything that was even remotely negative.
 
If what everyone is saying about the mods over at fatfrogs is true, then they should be partially blamed for this situation happening in the first place. A lot of the mud-dragging that K412 went through (of which I regretfully participated in) had to do with her initial response to Ed when the frog had passed away. If fatfrogs was filled with nothing but posts gloriously praising Ed, then of course she would've assumed that the frog's death was her fault!

I know what Ed is. He's devious, and he has his own agenda. While he's not someone to be trusted, at least most people know that he's not to be trusted. Now why would the mods who should unbiased, go out of their way to protect the reputation of a seller that people were clearly having issues with?
 
jayefbe said:
I know what Ed is. He's devious, and he has his own agenda. While he's not someone to be trusted, at least most people know that he's not to be trusted. Now why would the mods who should unbiased, go out of their way to protect the reputation of a seller that people were clearly having issues with?
Click to expand...

Just a thought, but financial contribution comes to mind, and just like Ed to purchase power. Or at least, what he perceives as power.
 
K412 said:
Dr. Owens, are you a herp vet? Would you mind looking at the necropsy on page 5 post #186 and offering your opinion Sir?
Click to expand...
I'm not a vet. I'm a physician. However, based on the microscopy report, I agree with the diagnostic conclusions. The findings were consistent with what you would expect to see in bacteremia. The comments that were made after the diagnosis are also very logical, and seem consistent with the findings.

It's unfortunate that the frog was preserved (rather than fresh) at the time of necropsy. It would have been interesting to have obtained cultures of the bacteria in order to try to determine a causative organism. (Although if the frog had been dead very long at the time the cultures were obtained, then they would have shown nothing more than polymicrobial contamination.) However, at this point, the question would have been nothing more than academic.
 
jayefbe said:
If what everyone is saying about the mods over at fatfrogs is true, then they should be partially blamed for this situation happening in the first place. A lot of the mud-dragging that K412 went through (of which I regretfully participated in) had to do with her initial response to Ed when the frog had passed away. If fatfrogs was filled with nothing but posts gloriously praising Ed, then of course she would've assumed that the frog's death was her fault!

I know what Ed is. He's devious, and he has his own agenda. While he's not someone to be trusted, at least most people know that he's not to be trusted. Now why would the mods who should unbiased, go out of their way to protect the reputation of a seller that people were clearly having issues with?
Click to expand...


I would like to add that the admin at the beginning of this situation also sided with Kelly but later changed his mind. I can't help but wonder what made him change his mind so quickly.

Fatfrogs is not only filled with posts but there's a sticky thread dedicated to ED and how wonderful he is. He did donate a couple pacmans for the raffle they had a couple months back but I really don't think that's what it is. Wish I knew :shrug01:.
 
K412 said:
Goblinmatt who defended him here caught him lying on fatfrogs and stated that Ed charged him .50 for newspaper and wet tissues. QUOTE]

Ummm...that was supposed to be a joke..

If you saw the post ed said "and I throw in the news paper for free :rolleyes: "
Click to expand...
 
I would like to respond to everything directed towards me but I can't, I'm taking way too many warning points for responding to you... so I'm out. :)

I would like to say that I work in the toughtest field there is shipping live frogs. I do that at a very high rate of success and I have been doing that for a long time, I also offer a guarantee that few others will dare offer with frogs and I honor that guarantee all the time.things happen sometimes and I almost always go above and beyond to make things right.

Out of the thousands I have an unsatisfied customer in Kelly Brown, she has been less than truthful right from the get go in this situation. I asked her about the guys that pushed her into this thread and are coaching her, telling her what to do....no answer from her? I'm not gonna bring up the personal stuff with her as I dont think it applies here.

I think most of you can see the petty personal attacks that have taken this thread so far off track.

To those that have threatened me bodily harm and even death.....I wish you all the very best.
 

Attachments

  • ! Baby Waxy..jpg
    ! Baby Waxy..jpg
    193 KB · Views: 286
Back
Top