ed clark- liar, theif, bad guy- will you answer questions NOW?

[Mooing Tricycle]

The way everybody was calling him names and cursing at him, I don't blame him for not wasting his time in here.

Y'know noone would still be here today if he just worked with Emily and the other Person with the cresteds in the first place. How is it THAT hard to understand??

There isnt a Lynch mob. Theres a Group of people who AGREE that ED didnt do things right. if he HAD or even just made an attempt to talk to these people when he was supposed to, and NOT months later, this wouldnt have even gone as far as it has.

 

[Dragondad]

Y'know noone would still be here today if he just worked with Emily and the other Person with the cresteds in the first place. How is it THAT hard to understand??

There isnt a Lynch mob. Theres a Group of people who AGREE that ED didnt do things right. if he HAD or even just made an attempt to talk to these people QUOTE]


Given the title of this thread and terms used by the so called mob in a descriptive manner. This is just what you say it isnt. A Lynch mob. So what in all the things you just described as "not working with two people" constitutes the terms used by several to describe Ed's business practices.


I would really like to hear the justification?

 

[Mooing Tricycle]

Given the title of this thread and terms used by the so called mob in a descriptive manner. This is just what you say it isnt. A Lynch mob. So what in all the things you just described as "not working with two people" constitutes the terms used by several to describe Ed's business practices.


I would really like to hear the justification?

How IS it a lynch mob? just the fact that because ed had done wrong, and people just bring it up as a refresher?

Hows about Chris at TSE, i bet youd jump all over him in a heartbeat. but thats okay, cause he did worse things. Like. Lying and sending false hets and ran with peoples money.

Oh thats funny, kinda reminds me of someone... someone who, in a way, is doing ALMOST ( maybe not quite so obviously) those very same things. ( Sending Possibly incorrect animals *W/C or CBB?*, Stating that normal animals are like morphs in a very misleading way ( those ad's he had up, theyre in another thread somewhere) and saying in private message that you can know whats going on, but you have to promise not to tell anyone.( that was to me, and i wasnt about to lie or even attempt to lie when i might have had information that might be important, good or bad, so i denied it.) Right. Because thats just SO right that everyone should just sit back and let it happen. of course.

And were a damned Lynch Mob? Get real!! This is the BOI, its open to anyone, agree or disagree. You have proof that states otherwise to stop those who feel the need to post refreshers, post it, otherwise, dont go around saying that this site, and the members that ARE close to eachother are some sort of Mob without any direction.
I can say that probably most of us, have one common goal, and thats to try in any way we can, to get rid of scum. Call it what you like, but i see no "Lynch Mob" here. Just people who agree that things dont look so good from what weve seen here, and how things are handled with customers.

 

[shrap]

I would really like to hear the justification?

I would really like to hear why you think anyone owes you some kind of justification. Who they hell are you?

You dont like the words some people used, then go man up and ask them directly.

 

[snake5007]

Y'know noone would still be here today if he just worked with Emily and the other Person with the cresteds in the first place. How is it THAT hard to understand??

There isnt a Lynch mob. Theres a Group of people who AGREE that ED didnt do things right. if he HAD or even just made an attempt to talk to these people QUOTE]


Given the title of this thread and terms used by the so called mob in a descriptive manner. This is just what you say it isnt. A Lynch mob. So what in all the things you just described as "not working with two people" constitutes the terms used by several to describe Ed's business practices.


I would really like to hear the justification?

Justification? That's easy, you just have to READ THE THREADS.

 

[RJK890]

Quote:
Originaly Posted by critical bill
I was just thinking...while drinking. If Zombies were real, hungry for brains, Ed Clark and his sock puppet Robert Smelly would be two of the safest people on the planet.

Quote:
Originaly Posted by critical bill
This Robert Smelly fella just completes the menage a toi of the only other two Ed supporters, Bruce and Bud. Its an orgy of the unholy I'll tell ya.

Cynical Bill,
Charlie, It seems your cooking with too much vodka these days. I am not going to engage in a third grade rank out contest with you. Not because of the obvious intelligence advantage you have over me, but because you are a waste of time. Did you come up with the Smelly Kelly thing on your own? I haven't heard that one since elementry school.

The rest of Y'all,
I am no sock puppet, or supporter of Ed Clark. If you read post #2 on this thread you will see that I was asking Ed to answer the questions he had been dodging for so long. As soon as my line of thinking and reason doesn't seem to line up with that of the wolfpack, I mean lynch mob, err community, all of a sudden I protest too much, align myself with scum, and am a sock puppet in a menage a toi with the unholy.

Ed was here posting and answered all or most of the questions that were asked. Whether you or I believe that his answers are true or not is simply our opinion. The only thing left for Ed to do is post the fecal test results which he refuses to do. If he did not say that he would, I wouldn't think he owes it to anybody to post them based on Emily's thread. They really would not prove anything besides the fact that he told the truth about something. That said, I do not believe that he has them, but again, that is my opinion and not a fact.

The fact is that there is no way to know for sure if the tapeworms came from Ed or Emily, or if those animals were CBB or WC. It is also a fact that Ed has a terrible way of handling unsatisfied customers, and may be less than honest. Nothing more than that has been proven, IMO.

Would I deal with Mr.Clark in the future? If he had the right animal at the right price, Probably. Would I purchase a het from him? Nope.

 

[crotalusadamanteus]

I would really like to hear the justification?

Here's my justification...

When one lies, or gives half truths, they are a LIAR.

When one makes a promise, and don't stick to it, they are WORTHLESS and UNTRUSTWORTHY.

When one tries to scam, or mislead for profit, they are a SCAMMER.

When one runs away from issues they should be dealing with, they are a COWARD.

When one fits into all of those categories at the same time, they are WORTHLESS, UNTRUSTWORTHY, COWARDLY, SCAMMING, LIAR.

Did I forget any names that this "role model" might have been called?


You people really need to wake up and get a clue. The reason there are so many bad guys out there, is because people are not willing to put a stop to it. You'd rather turn your backs and pretend nothing happened. These guys are COUNTING on that happening. It's how they are empowered to continue their ways.

I for one won't stand by and let that happen. No more than I'd turn my back on someone in need, regardless of the danger I may be putting myself in. All this meek bullshit is ruining our country. We are breeding a bunch of freaking sissies to run our future for us.

Get over it. Grow a pair, and make a difference in the world. All this "be kind to the crooks" crap is for the birds.

 

[snake5007]

I did not say that I believe or disbelieve the answers Ed gave, just that he had answered the questions.

The above quote makes your above post nonsensical. Maybe you should stop cooking with vodka.

 

[RJK890]

No Nonsense

When I wrote that quote I had not said whether I believed or disbelieved Ed's answers, but was attacked for "sticking up" for Ed.

The only thing I have said, is that I do not believe he has the fecal exam results(That was in the last post I made, so no nonsense there.) Concluding, "in my opinion," that he is lying about testing his collection. Is that support?

Please link me to where I said whether or not I believe Ed sent CBB animals instead of WC/CH, or any of his answers.

I simply said that he had answered the questions.

 

[critical bill]

The above quote makes your above post nonsensical. Maybe you should stop cooking with vodka.

Forget him....he's a tool.

 

[snake5007]

If you read post #2 on this thread you will see that I was asking Ed to answer the questions he had been dodging for so long.

Ed was here posting and answered all or most of the questions that were asked.

Which is it? Did he answer the questions or not?

 

[snake5007]

Forget him....he's a tool.

True. Even Ed knows when to give up on a lost cause.

 

[hhmoore]

Which is it? Did he answer the questions or not?

Aren't you paying attention? or do you just like to stir the pot?
Ed has visited this thread since post #2, and offered responses to some things (regardless of whether anybody chooses to accept/believe them). Of course, his visit was brief...and, not surprisingly, left people clamoring for more.

 

[hhmoore]

The point Mr Kelly is making is that just because a group of people don't like/accept/believe the answers, doesn't mean that answers have been given. Riding HIM doesn't serve much purpose here, does it?

 

[AF Exotics]

Richard you are correct..."There are no half-truths.Only the the truth and a lie.It is obvious here what choice Ed has made.This is his legacy by choice.As rough as the title of this thread might appear,Ed has done nothing to disprove it.

 

[shrap]

The point Mr Kelly is making is that just because a group of people don't like/accept/believe the answers, doesn't mean that answers have been given. Riding HIM doesn't serve much purpose here, does it?

He told a bunch of verifiable lies Harald. Ed said he flipped Emily's geckos to that other guy and Emily has proven they are not the same geckos. Ed has not answered a damn thing here. He has side stepped the issues once again with lies and BS and had once again accused honest people of being liars with nothing to back up what he says. As usual.

On a side note, your crap is really getting as hard to stomach as Ed's.

 

[critical bill]

On a side note, your crap is really getting as hard to stomach as Ed's.

Heh heh heh. I almost shot gin out me nostrils!

Whoa...but let me stay on topic...the topic freak enforcement team has been out in full force lately. I agree with what you said about Ed.

 

[hhmoore]

If you read post #2 on this thread you will see that I was asking Ed to answer the questions he had been dodging for so long.

In the next paragraph, he stated:

Ed was here posting and answered all or most of the questions that were asked. Whether you or I believe that his answers are true or not is simply our opinion

David combined the two statements and asked this.

Which is it? Did he answer the questions or not?

I am aware of many of the inconsistencies between the various stories (I won't claim to know them all, as I am sure there are parts I have forgotten). I also agree that Ed dropped the ball on this from the start, and said so in the other thread. That doesn't mean that I can't acknowledge RJK's statement that Ed did offer responses to the questions. That doesn't mean that anybody is accepting those statements as the truth. It doesn't mean that he has satisfied anybody's request for proof. It doesn't deny that Ed seems to have declined Randy's offer regarding the alleged fecal results.
It just means that, like them or not, those seem to be the answers Ed is sticking with at this time....and beating up on RJK for pointing that out isn't going to bring Ed back here to say anything different - to "confess his sins", if you will.

 

[ravensgait]

yeah I haven't heard from Ed so I guess I wont be seeing the test results.

We seem to have a problem with semantics here some are saying he answered the questions and hey if asked if the sky is blue and Ed says 147 that is still an answer. May not be the right answer or make any sense but it is an answer. I think that's what Harald and RJK 890 's point was. Ed Answered, the answers may or may not be complete or the truth but they are answers which is more than we were getting from him..Randy

 

[JackJebus]

Wow, is all I have to say. I don't think I have ever read 48 pages asking the same questions over an over again before just in different ways. Some people think Ed is a liar, some people just don't like him, some people think he is alright. We all got that. It seems like some of you are fishing for something that just cant be caught. If you can tell me one business that is perfect then I would love to know. Even Microsoft has issues. I just personally think that if Ed doesn't want to respond to your questions he doesn't have to. If he is willing to take the beef you guys say about him so be it. There is no reason to drag it out farther than it really needs to be. Bringing up past events is really pointless. Theres no use in beating a dead dog. I mean sure it might go away ofter beating it to a pulp and a few rains but seriously this is going nowhere.

Any of you guys ever think about being a lawyer? I mean it doesn't matter what the question is its how many different ways you can think to ask it.

Maybe the mods should change the BoI to a flaming board instead.