• In case most of you have not noticed, I made changes to the donation amounts as well as the durations for all of the paid membership levels. Things are winding down here, and this seems to be the most prudent way to deal with the "end of life" period of this site.

    Contributor level members - $10 per 30 days
    Sponsors - Eliminated
    Benefactor level members - $25 per 30 days
    Endowment level members - $50 per 30 days

    Account Upgrades Page
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Everyone post your pics of.....

OK, OK... but I'm confused now. Does this mean that all 'bling' morphs are actually het for 'non-bling'? Is a 'bling' gecko the same as a 'fru-fru'? If so, wouldn't it be called a 'fling'?
not all bling geckos are het for non bling, some are infact het for some type of bling...
and fru fru and bling are the same thing fru fru is just monte-ism
and a fling is a totally different subject altogether.....

if someone came up with a "super non bling" would it still be a "non bling"...or would it then be in the "bling" class...or what about a "hybino non bling"? OK, I'm sold...if ya'll have any het "non blings" I'll take them...LOL (by the way do you think non bling is co-dom or what)

a super non bling would still be a non bling just darker... you cant have a hybino non bling without is being a bling... i think that non blings are either co-dominant or dominant

A couple of non-blingers - my original pair, Geico and Studley. They make nice lavender babies. She's het for patty, too . . . .

the one of the left is bling-ish... now whomever is het pattey (if its the one on the right) she would be a non bling het for bling (patty)
 
Yes, it seems as though Robin may have single handedly started a new morph...so I guess she gets to make up the rules!

And, yes Monte, I've noticed head pattern being very similar from parent to offspring. It seems like the head pattern almost mimics exactly a parent in some cases. I know Albey worked on a cool head pattern for a while (halloween phase or something like that)...here's a link to an old add or something that shows some of the cool head patterns he produced...

http://herpcam.com/images/albeyhalloween.gif
gotta give it minute to load...
 
sorry other pic did not show up..

Piccolo:
Piccolo2.jpg


Piccolo and Treeco in old set-up:
3f854451.jpg



leo pics
 
rjward97, 2nd pic, on the bottom left... purdy gecko :)

Nice pics guys.. I have a HY I will take a pic of later, she is het nothing, one of my first.
 
Here is my first and only gecko, for now... Hopefully in the next couple of days Im getting my male. Her name is Smeagol. She is so nice. Such a good girl!!!!
th_flower5.jpg


th_posing1.jpg
 
heres some of my non bling blings some of them where giving to me in poor health and missing toes but making a good turn around. :)
 

Attachments

  • Picture 584.jpg
    Picture 584.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 76
  • Picture 585.jpg
    Picture 585.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 70
  • Picture 592.jpg
    Picture 592.jpg
    18.3 KB · Views: 73
  • Picture 593.jpg
    Picture 593.jpg
    15.3 KB · Views: 79
This thread is great! Finally, normals get the recognition they deserve. They are, afterall, getting more and more rare. Nowdays how often do you see a normal that is not a het?
 
Here is Shela, my daughter's female. She is about to molt in this pic, so she is usually not so whitish. Right now she is HUGE with eggs, and my male isnt even old enough to breed her!
shela327.jpg
 
Back
Top