• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

GigantaBabies?

Snakesitter

New member
Joined
Mar 16, 2010
Messages
1,809
Reaction score
48
Points
0
Location
San Antonio, TX
At Living Gems, we keep very detailed records of weights and growth over time. Accordingly, I have a pretty good idea what babies normally weigh -- according to those records, ranging from a low of 24 grams to a high of 36 grams over the 83 babies for which I have records, with an average of 30.1 and a standard deviation of 2.8.

Last December, Agate surprised me by dropping a litter of only a few very large babies. These “little ones” ranged from 41 grams to 46 grams, with an average of 43.6.

In statistics, “…nearly all values lie within three standard deviations of the mean in a normal distribution” (Wikipedia). All prior experience seems to suggest such a normal distribution, with babies (excluding split-sack twins) falling closely grouped around their average.

These babies, however, weighed *4.8* standard deviations about the norm.

To illustrate this, I pulled two baby drawers: Baby #A-07 from our first litter of the year, and Baby #C-07 from this new litter:

12095520415_b93e2ca259_z.jpg


Here they are side by side:

12095806613_d5962848f0_z.jpg


And, in closer shots:

12096175216_7e583b1520_z.jpg

12095804903_8ede2884b7_z.jpg


Note they were almost the same size…even though Litter A was 5.5 months old at the time…and Litter C only less than two weeks old.

Even more mysterious, Agate seems to have dropped early. Her POS to delivery time was only 108 days, and the babies visually supported this by their distended bellies, less developed colors, and the fact that one was born with a small unabsorbed yolk sack:

12096172996_4a4422e901_z.jpg


I spoke with several other breeders, none of whom could recall a litter like this. Thus, I’d like to cast a broader net: have any other rainbow breeders seen results like this?

Thank you for reading,
 
Big beautiful babies Cliff. Congrats!

Interesting that she delivered a bit early, yet the babies were that large.
 
I can't really add anything as I don't breed BRB but that is very interesting. I look forward to some answers as well. Keep us posted on their growth rate compared to your previous litters? I wonder if they will stay larger or eventually even out to normal size.
 
Back
Top