Bringerofdoom
New member
look at cats. thanks to one idiot in europe there exist 2 species of cat that he bred for the soul purpose of a defect. now over the 40 years of turning out these deformed babies from it, it gets a name and status as a breed of a cat.
to me imo opinion this moron should have never bred this deformity. let alone anyplace that gives breed status to it and awards this guy with a unique breed name.
if anyone doesnt know what im talking about read http://www.cfainc.org/breeds/profiles/scottish.html that. to me its a ugly cat, that never ever should have been bred.
to me breeding for a gentic defect is about the same as breeding direct siblings to improve the color and to make the specific trait stronger. they should both be highly frowned upon.
i will admit, i once bred animals for a gentically defective trait. it wasnt a sicking trait though. it was for a thyriod type problem, that would cause the dogs to grow into their 3rd years. they had always proven very healthy despite being over 100+ lbs(chows and labs were parents) and 2-3x bigger than usual. we had taken one of the puppies to a vet once and got a good laugh. she remarked "thats one healthy 10 week old puppy you got there" i just liked the expression on her face when i informed her it was 5 1/2 weeks old at the time.
i dont see what i did was wrong, there are many cases where animals were bred for size. either to improve the size or to dwarf it. thats totally different than breeding for lack of eyes and other anomolies like that though.
to me imo opinion this moron should have never bred this deformity. let alone anyplace that gives breed status to it and awards this guy with a unique breed name.
if anyone doesnt know what im talking about read http://www.cfainc.org/breeds/profiles/scottish.html that. to me its a ugly cat, that never ever should have been bred.
to me breeding for a gentic defect is about the same as breeding direct siblings to improve the color and to make the specific trait stronger. they should both be highly frowned upon.
i will admit, i once bred animals for a gentically defective trait. it wasnt a sicking trait though. it was for a thyriod type problem, that would cause the dogs to grow into their 3rd years. they had always proven very healthy despite being over 100+ lbs(chows and labs were parents) and 2-3x bigger than usual. we had taken one of the puppies to a vet once and got a good laugh. she remarked "thats one healthy 10 week old puppy you got there" i just liked the expression on her face when i informed her it was 5 1/2 weeks old at the time.
i dont see what i did was wrong, there are many cases where animals were bred for size. either to improve the size or to dwarf it. thats totally different than breeding for lack of eyes and other anomolies like that though.

:deer:
